Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_1_(15440401011).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
,_de_Rafael_Navarro.jpg){kind=link}
-2.2K.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![100 File:Henri Guybet, sur le tournage du film "Le Rire tranquille", de Gilles Botineau.JPG](#File:Henri_Guybet,_sur_le_tournage_du_film_"Le_Rire_tranquille",_de_Gilles_Botineau.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Smilodon fatalis saber-toothed tiger reconstruction (Upper Pleistocene; California, USA) 1 (15440401011).jpg
[edit]_1_(15440401011).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1_(15440401011).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free picture at a museum: "signage at Cincinnati Museum of Natural History & Science, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA" FunkMonk (talk) 10:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Löschen not sure why I missed this one during my clean up run but indeed, com:DW of non free content. Natuur12 (talk) 11:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. FunkMonk (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC) FunkMonk (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
http://www.casallotja.com/el-comerc BrightRaven (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio case. BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello f g ch hx y j ffcfv 181.137.211.53 20:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Jaypatel111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]New Flickr account Flickrwashing. Please add the user to the Commons:Questionable Flickr images as well.
Josve05a (talk) 22:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Some error during the upload Stanko (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: McZusatz (talk) 08:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Errors during the upload Stanko (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: dupe of File:Władysław Bończa-Rutkowski - Orka 1897.jpg McZusatz (talk) 08:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Uneven shading, poor fileformat. Have File:Bromacia benzenu.png that is slightly better. DMacks (talk) 21:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion, no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused personal image -- Christian Ferrer 04:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused personal image -- Christian Ferrer 04:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
unused personal image -- Christian Ferrer 04:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Double of File:Ivar_Haglund_with_unidentified_woman,_1960_(14608322499).jpg Rashinseita (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
- Deleting as duplicate. In the future, you can use {{Duplicate}} and this sort of thing will be handled as a speedy delete. - Jmabel ! talk 05:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be taken from the subject's Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/taskin2official Ytoyoda (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: https://twitter.com/taskin2official Ytoyoda (talk) 05:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Likely taken from: https://twitter.com/iamtaskin/status/576062456327352320 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Logos et images recopiés du site internet de la ville de Saint-Martin-d'Hères : http://www.saintmartindheres.fr/ Poudou99 (talk) 08:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rakxit Patil (RKO) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:AASSAAN HAI.JPG
- File:Wikipedia rakxit patil thought.jpg
- File:Success Of rakxit patil.jpg
- File:Wikipedia Rakxit Patil.jpg
- File:Rakxit Patil AASAAN HAI.jpg
- File:Rakxit rapstar.jpg
- File:Reality rakxit patil.jpg
- File:Motivation Thoughts Of Rakxit Patil.jpg
- File:Mind By Rakxit Patil.jpg
- File:Inspiration By Rakxit patil.jpg
- File:Iifa award rakxit.JPG
- File:Award party rakxit patil.JPG
- File:Aɡe rakxit.JPG
- File:Change Thought Rakxit Patil.jpg
- File:Ceɔ rakxit patil.JPG
- File:Rakxit patil ɑʃ.jpg
- File:Buddha Thought Rakxit Patil.jpg
- File:Rakxit patil.jpg
- File:RAKXIT.jpg
- File:Success Of Rakxit Patil.jpg
- File:Rapstar.jpg
- File:Rakxit patil founder.jpg
- File:Rakxit.jpg
- File:Rakxit patil ceo.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use.
- File:Tape art portrait of smile boy.jpg
- File:Tape-art скотч-арт.jpg
- File:Tape art country portrait.JPG
- File:Blue girl Tape art.jpg
- File:Sad face tape art.JPG
- File:Child tape art.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karineamayac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Grabaciones VIAJEROS para RCN.jpg
- File:Sesión de foto perfil actriz Karine Amaya.jpg
- File:Grabación de VIAJEROS en la mina de sal.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sebastian barnes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use
- File:Alternative4cabbage2.jpg
- File:Alternative1sma2lflowerl4.jpg
- File:Alternative1smallflower0.jpg
- File:Alternative4cabbage0.jpg
- File:Greentriflower8.jpg
- File:Bigwall flower.jpg5.jpg
- File:Blueflower.jpg5.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sujkineimad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JonathanArtist1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: artworks without obvious educational use, used in a draft rejected for lack of notability.
BrightRaven (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use, self-promotion.
- File:The clocks.jpg
- File:Schardar building.jpg
- File:Fary and teresa my lover.JPG
- File:Dinner blvd.JPG
- File:Mary.JPG
- File:Circa 1987.JPG
- File:Oils and acrilys on canvas.JPG
- File:Farideh schardar artist painter.JPG
BrightRaven (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlosromanosilveira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use
- File:El cuarto (dedicado a la poeta jacqueline coquies maestre).jpg
- File:Señorita Q.jpg
- File:Chromatic redemption.jpg
- File:Muerte electrica.png
- File:El vuelo de la primavera.png
- File:Eco y Narciso.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlosromanosilveira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Carlos Romano Silveira).
- File:Paisaje incomforme carlos romano.jpg
- File:Geometria estelar, obra de Carlos Romano.jpg
- File:Descampados, obra de Carlos Romano Silviera.jpg
- File:Acantilado, obra de Carlos Romano.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Where is the line between art that is educational and art that is not? How could I recognize that? There are thousands of photos in Wikimedia Commons of art that are not used elsewhere. Are they all not educational? I enjoy browsing through pictures of art in Wikimedia Commons, used elsewhere or not. And there are even far more pictures of other subjects I would rather delete than these ones, for instance photos that look nearly simular, but aren't, or bad photos (not sharp); deletion requests for those were turned down. So why should these photos be deleted? And if lack of categories is an issueː I would love to categorize pictures of art, but I won't spend time to files which have been (or might be) nominated for deletion. So if categories would save these files for Wikimedia Common (or other art files), just ask me. JopkeB (talk) 08:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Educational or not (why not), photographs of paintings usually require COM:OTRS to verify painter's identity. --Strakhov (talk) 05:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Safety Cars (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:TITANIO-Profesor Maximiliano Degleue.pdf
- File:Equipos de Proteccion contra Incendios.pdf
- File:Energias Renovables 2014-Biodiesel-.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corneliakane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Pierre Kleykamp.JPG
- File:Opa in New York in 1951.JPG
- File:Opa with his fabric behind him - 1952.JPG
- File:Opa in 1942.JPG
- File:Opa and Loulou (in Holland).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BuffaloJay1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from other images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
I see the word "[Ticket#: 2015072810017149] but I see no licencing, nor true evidence of the OTRS process. Timtrent (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Then ask in the OTRS Noticeboard if the ticket is valid, and what is the actuali license instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
I goofed and misread the license when uploading. Ckoerner (talk) 01:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Didym. Green Giant (talk) 18:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unsuitable format for content type (image and rich text); doubful permission for photograph; off-scope text (non-notable primary document). Unused. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. EXIF suggests author is "Novecun" which is very different from uploaders username Green Giant (talk) 18:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Create by long-term abuser (User:GILP007), globally locked for adding irrelevant material on several projects. No EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Phone screenshot and possibly not owned by the uploader. SounderBruce 22:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
inappropriate uncyclopaedic out of scope image Ww2censor (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 20:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Celebrity portrait, all other files are copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 20:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW? Yann (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 20:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Promo shot, unlikely to be free. Yann (talk) 23:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MC JEHOVAH (talk · contribs)
[edit]I strongly doubt all the elements in these collages are self-made.
- File:Bataille snoop dog eminem MC JEHOVAH.jpg
- File:ANSA645531 Articolo.jpg
- File:Septembre2001.jpg
- File:Croisade-mc-jehovah.jpg
- File:Does-the-watchtower-society-replace-jehovah.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: artwork without obvious educational use, only used on a user page without useful contribution to the project. BrightRaven (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Asking to get a specific permission from the author is NOT a valid free licence. Scoopfinder(d) 15:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
It is my personal description which I do not want to be published anymore Sansate (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Didym (talk) 21:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work", no evidence of permission, a similar image with slightly different colouring is at [1], similar problems in the past (see user talk) GermanJoe (talk) 16:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As the content creator, after reviewing Commons guidelines, I find this out of scope. Willowbl00 (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaulMauser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Chef Paul Mauser.JPG
- File:Paul Mauser.JPG
- File:Paul vs Bufallo.JPG
- File:Paul Heiner Mauser.jpg
- File:Familienwappen "Paul Heiner Mauser".jpg
Ies (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PaulMauser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Chef Paul Mauser.JPG
- File:Paul Mauser.JPG
- File:Paul vs Bufallo.JPG
- File:Paul Heiner Mauser.jpg
- File:Familienwappen "Paul Heiner Mauser".jpg
Ies (talk) 18:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
,_de_Rafael_Navarro.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_de_Rafael_Navarro.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio http://cultura.cordoba.es/uploads/Publicaciones/201412-60anios-catalogo.pdf Laura Fiorucci (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
,_de_Rafael_Navarro.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
,_de_Rafael_Navarro.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by JC Ketchell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Löschen Clear copyvio of club Colo-Colo . Fma12 (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 23:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
copyvio soccer team logo: http://www.colocolo.cl/ Vareloco (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope as no realistic educational use; unused, out of focus, and topic invisible Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused contrived flag; potentially misleading even if used in the manner for which it was intended (it could be mistaken for a symbol of something that exists outside WMF projects) and therefore out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support. It's a non-existent flag that can lead people to believe that it has existed. Looks nice, but serves no useful purpose. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Littlecold22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused non-notable logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, these are unused and therefore likely out of scope.
Storkk (talk) 10:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of photos of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Metadata credits a "wsebastian". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
-2.2K.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2.2K.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Collage of photos of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
-2.2K.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
-2.2K.jpg){kind=link}
Three versions of a collage of photos of unknown origin and copyright status.
- File:SADHANAMUSIC (Баннер)-2.K.jpg
- File:SADHANAMUSIC (Баннер)-2.jpg
- File:SADHANAMUSIC (Баннер)-1.jpg
-2.K.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Storkk (talk) 11:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
First, the license on the facebook page isn't explicit enough, it just says "free to use", which could mean any of a number of things. But second, I don't think the picture is in scope. It seems to be a Swedish deejay that doesn't have particular notability; it is the only upload of User:Delayers112, and was apparently used for his only contribution to EN, which was speedily deleted back in 2012 (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Delayers112). GRuban (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
This looks like newspaper scan not photograph by the uploder Jarekt (talk) 11:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carole witemen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Hakim benotmane.JPG
- File:Hakim benotmane-avion.JPG
- File:Benotmane-hakim.JPG
- File:Benotmane hakim.JPG
- File:NABAB-benotmane-hakim.JPG
- File:Hakim-benotmane.JPG
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a crop of a screenshot from a Moldovan news program https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0cRxcdqHaE around 0:30 or so. Now the program has been released by the news program, so normally screenshots from it would be fine, but this particular image is a still photo, and can't be guaranteed to be owned by the news program. It is not unheard of for news programs to use commercial or fair use photos like this that they didn't take themselves in their programs. GRuban (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Sorry, but the "permissions link" https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=481359235231924&set=a.383488051685710.97434.100000735546306&type=3&theater doesn't actually say that you own the rights to the image and release it into the public domain. If you are Kat Wolf, please change it so it does, or email Commons:OTRS with proof of your identity (such as from an email address known to be hers) and saying that you do so. GRuban (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a crop of a screenshot from a released news program, around 0:30. Normally that would be fine, but this was displayed as a still photo, so it's not guaranteed that Accent TV had the rights to release the photo. It is not unheard of for news programs to use official still photos and such in their news programs that they did not take themselves. GRuban (talk) 13:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Gusmart de Barros (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Gusmart-mau.jpg
- File:Guu.jpg
- File:AbdielExtroSignoNagrelhaReipandaReadyNeutro.jpg
- File:Gú.jpg
- File:Vanilsia.jpg
- File:Gu-logo.jpg
- File:Gusmart-praia.jpg
- File:Gusmart.jpg
- File:Gusmar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
By uploader's history, all his uploads where copyvio. Elisardojm (talk) 10:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Scan of a photo - uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ірина Первакова (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be extracted from a presentation. If uploader is the copyright holder or they are otherwise freely licensed, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS.
Storkk (talk) 10:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Most probably false licensing. A big transparent logo of ČTK (Česká tisková kancelář, Czech News Agency) is placed in the middle of the picture. Vachovec1 (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Arm 01/logs with multiple similar uploads (all deleted by several reasons) and File:EVO Estadio Vasconselos OAXACA Broissin Architects Exterior.jpg (uploaded 2011) which was (even as part of a collage) previously published at official blog of "BROISSIN Architects" via http://broissinarchitects.blogspot.de/2008/10/oaxaca-warriors-baseball-park.html (2008). Per this user talk the user appears to be a student and not an employee of above company, so a permission from "BROISSIN Architects" would be appropriate.
- File:EVO Estadio Vasconselos OAXACA Broissin Architects Exterior.jpg
- File:Estadio Vasconselos OAXACA Broissin Architects Field.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 21.08.2014, 22:07 by Blosk5 (talk · contributions · Statistics) the exif indicates to a copyrighted work by "T&J Studios". In fact the photo was published on same day (but some hours before) via official Facebook of en:Beechcraft (an American manufacturer of general aviation and military aircraft, part of the en:Textron-group) = https://www.facebook.com/Beechcraft/photos/a.167386216607616.40556.154464757899762/837431692936395/?type=1&theater (21.08.2014, 18:00, identical exif) linking to a news entry (today: 404, moved to:) = http://txtav.com/en/newsroom/2014/08/beechcraft-delivers-t6c-trainers-king-air-350er-to-mexican-navy (21.08.2014, Copyright © 2015 Textron Aviation) = "Photo 2 of T-6C+ Delivery to Mexican Navy" = http://textron.vo.llnwd.net/o25/CES/releases/T-6C-plus-Delivery2.jpg (higher res, complete exif available, last modified: 21.08.2014, 14:15).
Btw, ignore https://www.flickr.com/photos/130635973@N06/16235058796, uploaded 01.2015 by "Blosk Cerrillo", a Flickr stream (full of copyrighted works) which might be related to the uploader (similar names). Gunnex (talk) 09:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Page http://remnant-memories.tistory.com/tag/2NE1 clearly says "do not edit or remove logo". So even if the image is released, it is not editable, so is not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. GRuban (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP — regards, Revi 09:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Page http://remnant-memories.tistory.com/tag/2NE1 clearly says "do not edit or remove logo". So even if the image is released, it is not editable, so is not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. GRuban (talk) 13:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. — regards, Revi 09:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content (no FOP for temporary displayings). FDMS 4 01:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Billboard. Not permanent in public space -> no FoP. Wdwd (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
This unused file has no description, source or author, and is out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Wdwd (talk) 08:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete, because this file is abusive.There was written Bibin, which is surname of live people.--Aram Soghomonyan (քննարկում) 20:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Hedwig in Washington. JuTa 19:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No official site or source of this image was found, see google search results. File uploaded in 2007, the file would have a source in that time. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kommentar I have resourced dozens of these images; this one doesn't seem to have a source at all. The initial upload site given doesn't exist. COM:EVID requires a valid source from the user who adds the file to Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No source A.Savin 20:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This was cropped from an Accent TV newscast, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIP8YaxP9N4 at 1:22 or so ... however if you look around there, you will see it was a still photo, not part of the filmed newscast, so it's not guaranteed that Accent TV actually took the photo, so have the right to release it. Newscasts have been known to display photos that they didn't photograph. GRuban (talk) 03:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 20:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not clear that the photo was actually released into the public domain - "permission" link just goes to the Facebook page that (unless I just can't see it somewhere?) doesn't seem to say anything of the sort. It says shared with public, but that's not the same as released for the public to edit and reuse. GRuban (talk) 03:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
If User:Springjay is claiming to be Jo Ho, they really should write Commons:OTRS from an email address known to belong to her and say so. Otherwise the claim that they own Jo Ho's image from her web site and can release it under GFDL/CC_BY_SA seems far fetched. GRuban (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation by a sockpuppet Softlavender (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation by a sockpuppet Softlavender (talk) 04:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation by a sockpuppet Softlavender (talk) 04:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logos recopié du site internet de la ville de Saint-Martin-d'Hères : http://www.saintmartindheres.fr/ Poudou99 (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 20:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. While "the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States does not extend to sculptures. Storkk (talk) 11:05, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josealveslp (talk · contribs)
[edit]New Flickr account, possible flickrwashing, please put it on the "Questionable flickr authors"-list.
Josve05a (talk) 12:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shepard Fairey
[edit]I thought these images were posted on Flickr by an account owned by Shepard Fairey, but it does not seem to be the case (there is even a spelling mistake in the artist's name). So these are non authorized derivative works of a poster by a living artist, Shepard Fairey.
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188577).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188709).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188795).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635189445).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8636294542).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8636294850).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 13:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shepard Fairey
[edit]There is no FOP for 2D works in the US. Permission of Shepard Fairey is necessary.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Apparently, you are a Shepard Fairey's basher, are you? For your information, this is a gotdamn public art in a public place intended for public viewing! Yours very sincerely! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photojunkie (talk • contribs)
- For your information, US copyright law does not allow to publish photographs of public 2D artworks, without the permission of the artist. BrightRaven (talk) 07:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Löschen as per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. The artist has a copyright and there is no FOP for 2D art in the US. This images violate the artists copyright. Natuur12 (talk) 08:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- For your information, US copyright law does not allow to publish photographs of public 2D artworks, without the permission of the artist. BrightRaven (talk) 07:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Apparently, you are a Shepard Fairey's basher, are you? For your information, this is a gotdamn public art in a public place intended for public viewing! Yours very sincerely! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photojunkie (talk • contribs)
---
Deleted --A.Savin 20:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I realise that en WP has no bearing here. Even so please see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/S.P.Numbers where this editor has been determined to be the same editor as the subject of this picture, though not determined to be the same human being; ie. not necessarily Steve Humble.
Nonetheless this causes me to doubt the copyright ownership of the picture, since, if this is Steve Humble, the owner of the copyright will have taken the picture. I doubt that this is a self image.
I think that unwinding this requires a simple OTRS submission to show that the uploader owns the copyright Timtrent (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Tango project icons (raster versions) uploaded by Diti
[edit]Kraaa!
I do believe these SMALL images I uploaded 6 years ago are now useless! I am proposing the following pages for deletion:
- All 23 files within Category:Tango project/mimetypes/22px
- The Category:Tango project/mimetypes/22px category itself.
– Diti the penguin — 14:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Note that this icons are used - for example at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dpreserved Is it possible to create redirect leading from png to svg? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
errore denominazione file Marica Massaro (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Why not edit the description or request its renaming instead? --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus.. The building was designed by Valeriy Kucko (Russian: Валерий Борисович Куцко; born in 1955), Vladimir Budaev (Владимир Афанасьевич Будаев), Anatoliy Shabalin (Анатолий Андреевич Шабалин; born in 1946), Alexander Nitievsky (Александр Николаевич Нитиевский; born in 1961). Jarash (talk) 16:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: A.Savin 20:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Copyvio (copyvio). No reason or source provided for copyvio, file uploaded in 2014. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me, I seems to make a mistake. 廣九直通車10:07,1 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Request was withdrawn A.Savin 20:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Self-promoting images of very low quality, out of scope.
Achim (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I do not crossdress, so my photograph taken at the station is no longer appropriate. Kim Sherman1 (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I do not crossdress, so photograph of me in charity shop is no longer appropriate. Kim Sherman1 (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I do not crossdress, so photograph of me waiting for a bus is no longer appropriate. Kim Sherman1 (talk) 20:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I do not crossdress, so photograph of me in the boat yard is no longer appropriate. Kim Sherman1 (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Williams Osuna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from music.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk What is the problem?
- See Commons:Derivative works. What music were used in video? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk Disfigure- Blank https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7ZsBPK656s (no copyright).
- Their permission on https://www.youtube.com/user/NoCopyrightSounds/about (NCS Releases can be used by any YouTube or Twitch user in their monetized content.) is not too definitive. What about other users? Will be good idea to contact them and as to use {{Cc-zero}} explicitly. Anyway you need to credit them in video files description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk I changed the license.
- I meant license https://www.youtube.com/user/NoCopyrightSounds/about. File description should provide links to music and its license. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk Already.
EugeneZelenko (talk it's okay?.
- Please ask help of administrator who speaks your native language. Problems which I mentioned last time are still there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk ¿As contact?
- p7ZsBPK656s points to soundclock blank-disfigure as music source. And soundclock blank-disfigure indicates it's CC-BY-3.0, compatible with making a derived CC-BY-SA 4.0.
- The videos list "(Disfigure - Blank [NCS Release])" and link to p7ZsBPK656s in the source field. Should clarify that it refers to the music, but it's otherwise ok.
- IMHO we can
Keep them. Do you have any other issue with the videos? - Platonides (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Platonides EugeneZelenko it's okay?
Kept: 1 & 2 per Platonides. Deleted 3 because different music used. JuTa 20:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Williams Osuna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook/social media) resolutions, missing EXIF (except 2 files), per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Williams Osuna/logs and (e.g.) this recent user talk edit (= can't find a license) = http://www.mazatlaninteractivo.com.mx/new/noticias/ultimas-noticias/inauguran-tec-milenio-mazatl%E1n/ (= clearly copyrighted = "Mazatlán Interactivo © 2006-2009 ") = File:Tecmilenio mazatlan.jpg. All files mostly related to es:Mazatlán, a city in Mexico. Considering also
- File:Entrada acuario.jpg --> most likely taken from http://www.parquecentralmazatlan.com/acuario.html (Copyright © 2014 - 2020. Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México. Reservados todos los derechos) = http://nebula.wsimg.com/a87cede8ada0597b16d02309d1d6a848?AccessKeyId=EFC8A610B486D7D0036D&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
- File:Litoral de mazatlan.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked at the original upload with "(...) go Ruiz"), later cleaned by uploader.
- File:Mazatlan turismo.jpg --> mysteriously equipped with an arrow symbol lower middle
- File:Lobo marino Mazatlan.jpg --> most likely taken somewhere from https://www.facebook.com/pages/Acuario-Mazatl%C3%A1n/245193502192242?sk=photos_stream&tab=photos_albums with hundreds of similar photos.
- etc.
All kind of resolutions without exif available = (examples) 306 x 306 + 476 × 315 + 720 × 477 + 960 × 639 + 2.048 × 1.360.
- Special cases
- File:Semana santa mazatlan.webm (video) --> taken from (as indicated) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sabBChlNjY and permission given via File:Comprobante.jpg. For this kind of permission (which, btw, does not specify any details of {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}) COM:OTRS exists. Btw, no details about the copyright of the played music in the background.
- File:Mazatlan.png (collage) --> already affected by copyvio File:Mzt 11.jpg
- File:Libramiento mzt.webm --> copyright status of used music unclear
- File:Litoral de mazatlan.jpg
- File:Lobo marino Mazatlan.jpg
- File:Quelite sinaloa.jpg
- File:Faro Mazatlan.jpg
- File:Playa Mzt.jpg
- File:Playa Mazatlan.jpg
- File:Mazatlan Sinaloa.jpg
- File:Premios Oye Mazatlán.jpg
- File:Mzt moto.jpg
- File:Mazatlan2014.jpg
- File:Semana santa mazatlan.webm
- File:Mazatlan turismo.jpg
- File:Mazatlansinaloa.jpg
- File:Malecon de Mazatlan.jpg
- File:Zona dorada mazatlan.jpg
- File:Playa mazatlan.png
- File:Aeropuerto mazatlan.JPG
- File:Beisbol mazatlan.jpg
- File:Show aves mtz.jpg
- File:Niños en acuario mazatlan.jpg
- File:Entrada acuario.jpg
- File:Centro historico.jpg
- File:Carnaval mazatlan.jpg
- File:Malecon de mazatlan atardecer.jpg
- File:Mazatlan.png
- File:Mzt 4.jpg
- File:Mzt 6.jpg
- File:Mzt 5.jpg
- File:Mzt 2.jpg
- File:Mzt.jpg
- File:Mzt 33.jpg
- File:Mzt 13.jpg
- File:Mzt 12.jpg
- File:Mzt 10.jpg
- File:Mzt 8.jpg
- File:Mzt 7.jpg
- File:Mzt 9.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted --A.Savin 20:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Modern image does not appear to comply with PD Saudi 106.68.218.113 20:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I took this photograph and the Flickr page clearly states "All Rights Reserved." You are not the copyright holder and have no right to claim to be the holder or give rights to share or alter the photograph. You had no right to crop it either. 205.178.8.184 22:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: The original file where this cropped version comes has been uploaded in 2011 under the CC-BY-2.0 license, and FlickreviewR confirmed that; therefore, the same license and rights applies to this cropped version. CC licenses are irrevocable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as per the above. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrei Schutt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size without EXIF data / old pictures, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Wolfson.jpg
- File:BDU 1922.jpg
- File:BDU-1922.jpg
- File:Katsenbogen.jpg
- File:Kanczeuski Arsen.jpg
- File:Charter-97.jpg
- File:Matskevich 1995.jpg
- File:Matskevich-1995.jpg
- File:Matskevich--Gritsanov--Abushenko.jpg
- File:G-M-G.jpg
- File:Matskevich-Uladzimir.jpg
- File:Abushenko.jpg
Yann (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Комментарии от Andrei Schutt:
[edit]- Файлы
- File:Matskevich-Uladzimir.jpg;
- File:Matskevich-Vybor.jpg;
- File:G-M-G.jpg;
- File:Matskevich--Gritsanov--Abushenko.jpg;
- File:Matskevich-1995.jpg;
- File:Matskevich 1995.jpg;
- File:Charter-97.jpg
— предоставлены мне для свободного размещения в Википедии В. В. Мацкевичем (https://ru.wikipedia.org/Мацкевич,_Владимир_Владимирович_(философ)).
Данный факт можно подтвердить, обратившись по адресу электронной почты В. В. Мацкевича: [email protected]. — Andrei Schutt.
- Файлы
— это электронные копии изображений, находящихся в общественном достоянии (были созданы более 50—70 лет назад, нет указаний об их авторах, публикуются государственными учреждениями). Представленные копии — не точные копии, а отредактированные мной. — Andrei Schutt.
- Файл
- File:Wolfson.jpg является моей авторской работой, выполненной с использованием изображения, находящегося в общественном достоянии. — Andrei Schutt.
- Файл
- File:Abushenko.jpg в Интернете впервые был опубликован на принадлежащем мне ресурсе: http://soc-by.livejournal.com/23252.html. Внизу страницы указаны мои контактные данные, включая адрес электронной почты — тот же самый, по которому зарегистрирована моя учетная запись в Википедии.
Изображение было опубликовано с ведома и согласия человека, отображенного на нем, о чем присутствует указание в верху страницы: http://soc-by.livejournal.com/23252.html.
Все иные копии этого изображения, присутствующие в Интернете, взяты с моего ресурса.
Разместив данное изображение в Википедии под свободной лицензией, я подтвердил возможность свободного его использования. — Andrei Schutt.
Deleted: Inappropriate licensing A.Savin 20:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status is unclear: uploaded by Serge Gorlaw but at the source site http://www.fishtour.by/user/?id=48 referred to Zavjalova V.M. (nickname Alicka). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 20:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by あそぼよワサワサッ！ as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was:
This file is the copyright violation:
- It comes from: 1974 Takeo Miki 3 - Tokyo Foreign Minister Press Photo. This website says "Copyright © 1995-2015 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved.".
- This photograph was taken in Tokyo, Japan. This photograph was taken when Mr. Takeo Miki was serving as the Minister for Foreign Affairs. Mr. Takeo Miki served as the Minister for Foreign Affairs from December 3, 1966 to October 28, 1968. Therefore this photograph was taken after 1956. Then this problem is judged based on a Copyright law of Japan.
- Uploader said "This work is in the public domain in that it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 and without a copyright notice." However, the proof which supports his testimony does not exist.
- cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kiichi Miyazawa-1.jpg.|source=http://www.ebay.com/itm/1974-Takeo-Miki-3-Tokyo-Foreign-Minister-Press-Photo-/200787102277?pt=Art_Photo_Images&hash=item2ebfd80a45
Long standing image used on various Wikis; deserves DR. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Löschen The uploader said "This work is in the public domain in that it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 and without a copyright notice." However, the proof which supports his testimony does not exist. --あそぼよワサワサッ！ (talk) 21:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Löschen Daffy123 said "This work is in the public domain in that it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 and without a copyright notice." However, the proof which supports his testimony does not exist.--Beautifulcatwoman (talk) 01:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Kommentar 1923年から1977年までに著作権表示がないままアメリカで発行されていれば、パブリックドメインに該当すると思います。しかしながら、この写真は「1974年に東京で撮影されたもの」だと推測することはできますが、著作権表示がないまま1923年から1977年までにアメリカで発行されたかどうかまではわからないでしょう。著作権表示がないまま1923年から1977年までにアメリカで発行されていたという明確な根拠がないのであれば、そもそもパブリックドメインにはならないと思います。--111です (talk) 01:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Essentially has no source, just because it was found on a gov website doens't mean it was created by a gov employee. FunkMonk (talk) 10:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This only a vague argument on an over 10 year old file (which must get a more valid reason). ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 12:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- The valid reason is that there is no source or author provided. What is vague about that? FunkMonk (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- https://www.etsy.com/listing/186434793/prehistoric-animal-print-vintage-tiger ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- From a 1969 book? Certainly not PD then. FunkMonk (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- https://www.etsy.com/listing/186434793/prehistoric-animal-print-vintage-tiger ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- The valid reason is that there is no source or author provided. What is vague about that? FunkMonk (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: from 1969 book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Essentially has no source, just because it was found on a gov website doens't mean it was created by a gov employee. FunkMonk (talk) 10:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep (Same for File:Smilodon.jpg) This only a vague argument on an over 10 year old file (which must get a more valid reason). ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 12:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- The valid reason is that there is no source or author provided. What is vague about that? FunkMonk (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Non free source has been found: https://www.etsy.com/listing/186434793/prehistoric-animal-print-vintage-tiger It states it is from a 1969 book. You need to demonstrate this book is somehow a government work. FunkMonk (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- The valid reason is that there is no source or author provided. What is vague about that? FunkMonk (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS, I think it needs attribution and permission of the sculpture's creator A.Savin 17:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
These appear to be bogus arms. No such person as "Hon Joshua Wood" (See Category:Wood family, past version: "Coat of arms of The Hon Joshua Edward Dylan Wood, BSc, and his descendants") is listed in Debrett's Peerage, 2015, either under "Earl of Halifax" (family name "Wood") or in the index. Created by User:Peeragegb, possibly a WP:Sock-puppet of User:Jwhalifax, on whose user page is stated: "The Hon Joshua Wood is graphic designer, heraldic artist and a filmmaker based in London, United Kingdom." This image appears to relate purely to WP:Self-promotion, for which activity WP and commons are not appropriate places.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- The Hon Joshua Wood[1] did not submit this file. I would suggest not to use words such as bogus. If I am not published in Debretts Peerage 2015 and my family did not submit relevant documentation and information to Debretts that does not mean that I do not exist. I do not need to self promote myself, I have a Facebook and other resources to do so... You should be paying more attention to those people who deliberately submit false information and false claims that they are sons of The Rt Hon Charles Wood, 3rd Earl of Halifax for example, in addition claiming to be Viscount of Halifax living at Hickleton Hall Estate. I think you should be focusing more on that instead of attacking me (the person who contributes useful images to Wikipedia through my profile). I would suggest you not to make any connections with my name to other profiles or contributors to Wikipedia. In regards to my identity and style,see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MG_1204.png file. --Jwhalifax (talk) 15:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- No such legal person as "The Hon Joshua Wood" exists, so he cannot have a valid coat of arms. Invalid/inaccurate/bogus coats of arms are of no use to wikipedia users, and only serve WP:Self-promotion or to deliberately mislead, which are not valid uses of WP or commons. "The Hon." is a courtesy title used by sons of peers, and according to Debrett's Peerage, 2015, p.550, the present Earl of Halifax has only one son, Lord Irwin, whose first names are "James Charles" and who so far has only one son named "Hon.Rex Patrick Wood", born in 2010. The index does not list "Hon Joshua Wood" under any other peerage in the United Kingdom.(Nor is it a proper use of commons to upload such an image as User:Jwhalifax has done, see File:MG_1204.png. This is not Facebook). Any fantasist can call himself or herself "The Hon." and request DVLA to amend the name accordingly on a driving licence. If on the other hand, as the link to the image of the envelope from Buckingham Palace seems to suggest, the Queen granted the right to "Joshua Wood" to use the courtesy title "The Hon.", which would surely break all precedent, that is another matter, and no doubt on that basis the College of Arms might have granted said "Hon Joshua Wood" his own coat of arms, perhaps even with the extra-special honour of a grant of supporters (as shown in File:Coat of Arms of The Hon Joshua Wood.png), almost invariably borne by peers alone. I repeat: possibly User:Peeragegb is a WP:Sock-puppet of User:Jwhalifax (known as "The Hon Joshua Wood"), used to impart credibility to the image and to suggest in a deliberately misleading fashion that it was sanctioned or contributed by an official organisation called "Peerage of Great Britain" or similar. I request the image be deleted as deliberately misleading and self-promotional unless proof of the validity of such arms is cited from a reputable heraldic source.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 11:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC))
- You must be out of your mind. I submitted a copy of UK government issued Identification document with my name on it, and you still insist on that, "No such legal person as "The Hon Joshua Wood"". I am not claiming to be the son of Earl of Halifax! The Earl has only one son, Lord Irwin indeed as we argued with few guys claiming to be his sons. My point here is that I am the Hon Joshua Wood which I cleared by providing UK government issued Identification document and that these coat of arms are mine, they are not Invalid/inaccurate/bogus. There is no such name as "The Hon" and therefore one can not request DVLA to amend the name on a driving license, do not mislead people with your sick imagination. People are restricted from changing their name to a courtesy titles, read the UK laws. One can in fact have a name or change it to Lord, Duke, Earl, Baron not "The Hon", "The Rt Hon" etc. Sir, you literally twisted everything. The envelope is a proof of the form of address, it is also stamped by the Royal Mail as delivered. "The Hon." is a courtesy title granted to children, grandchildren of peers at the age of approximately 4. In 2015, the registration of coat of arms is not a must, anyone can have coat of arms either designed by the College of Arms or by private graphic designer, it can be kept as private or public, even as a logo to represent the person that it is designed for...etc
- If you want these arms to be removed, nothing will ever change your mind and nothing will stop you from doing it. Arms mostly adopted from my ancestors, with changing design according to College of Arms rules when one is not an heir to peerage, but has ties to the family is in full right to have the elements representing his ancestral background, in fact, one can use all ancestral shields of all his/hers lineage in one. --Jwhalifax (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Löschen - After checking the uploads of User:Peeragegb and Jwhalifax it is obvious that Peeragegb is a sockpuppet of Jwhalifax. Both nicks use the identical illusive, not existing categories, both overcat in the same manor and flood meta categories with nonsense entries.
- Even the nick indicates that he pretends to be related to the Earl of Halifax. The entire project looks like a self promotion and desired proof of a noble status that does not exist. -- Maxxl² - talk 15:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think Maxxl2 you've said all that needs to be said. But as I had just finished drafting my own reply before you posted, and at the possible risk of over-kill, I'll add that too: "The Hon." is not "a courtesy title granted to children, grandchildren of peers at the age of approximately 4", but is accorded at birth to sons alone of peers. As you say above, no one forces anyone to register DIY coats of arms, but those not granted by and registered at the College of Arms in London are generally termed "bogus". These may properly be called "trademarks", "logos", etc, but not "coats of arms". You still have not provided proof of the validity of such arms by citing a reputable heraldic source. Wikipedia and commons are not suitable places for publishing coats of arms "designed by a private graphic designer" reputedly for non-notable persons who have no other claim to legal existence other than a name on an envelope from Buckingham Palace (no doubt replying to their own letter so signed and headed) and a driving licence. The last item is not evidence of a person's valid right to use the courtesy title "The Hon.", as on application by anyone at all DVLA will add almost any title (Dr., The Hon., Lord (life peer)) to a driver's name without any evidence being demanded whatsoever except in the case of hereditary titles (i.e., Duke, Marquis, Earl, Baron). You are possibly familiar with this provision, set out in the DVLA's website https://www.gov.uk/change-name-driving-licence "Change the name on your driving licence". The image is "bogus" (to use the term usually adopted in such cases), possibly deliberately intended to mislead, possibly self-promotional, and possibly uploaded by a sock-puppet.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 16:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC))
- He is blocked now see here -- Maxxl² - talk 16:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC))
- Löschen Irrelevant, not needed file. --Shasst (talk) 03:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC))
- He is blocked now see here -- Maxxl² - talk 16:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think Maxxl2 you've said all that needs to be said. But as I had just finished drafting my own reply before you posted, and at the possible risk of over-kill, I'll add that too: "The Hon." is not "a courtesy title granted to children, grandchildren of peers at the age of approximately 4", but is accorded at birth to sons alone of peers. As you say above, no one forces anyone to register DIY coats of arms, but those not granted by and registered at the College of Arms in London are generally termed "bogus". These may properly be called "trademarks", "logos", etc, but not "coats of arms". You still have not provided proof of the validity of such arms by citing a reputable heraldic source. Wikipedia and commons are not suitable places for publishing coats of arms "designed by a private graphic designer" reputedly for non-notable persons who have no other claim to legal existence other than a name on an envelope from Buckingham Palace (no doubt replying to their own letter so signed and headed) and a driving licence. The last item is not evidence of a person's valid right to use the courtesy title "The Hon.", as on application by anyone at all DVLA will add almost any title (Dr., The Hon., Lord (life peer)) to a driver's name without any evidence being demanded whatsoever except in the case of hereditary titles (i.e., Duke, Marquis, Earl, Baron). You are possibly familiar with this provision, set out in the DVLA's website https://www.gov.uk/change-name-driving-licence "Change the name on your driving licence". The image is "bogus" (to use the term usually adopted in such cases), possibly deliberately intended to mislead, possibly self-promotional, and possibly uploaded by a sock-puppet.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 16:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC))
Deleted: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Text that can be very well be rendered in text itself on various wikis. No image format neede for this. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:03, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also adding one more file. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:05, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. Notice that not all the systems have all the fonts to render properly foreign characters. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept, by principle, Dharmadhyaksha is right, but the files are still used. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of probably copyrightable interior (Köln Arcaden was built in the 2000s) and German FoP is only applicable for external views of buildings. So, unfortunately, I cannot host this photo on Commons. A.Savin 13:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep was soll denn da geschützt sein? --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- The Köln Arcaden is an architectural work, so the architect can claim also their copyright on the interiors. --A.Savin 20:28, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, author's request.Taivo (talk) 09:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of probably copyrightable interior (Köln Arcaden was built in the 2000s) and German FoP is only applicable for external views of buildings. So, unfortunately, I cannot host this photo on Commons. A.Savin 13:03, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- It's possible, that the view is from outside of building through the glass windows - and so the FOP in Germany is also allowed. --K@rl (talk) 07:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- PS in german: Die Panoramafreiheit gilt für alles, was ich von der Straße aus sehen kann. Dazu gibt es Glassscheiben ;-) --K@rl (talk) 07:53, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's not from outside. I am the photographer of this image, so I know what I'm saying. --A.Savin 08:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- If you are the photograph, why do not set a speedy delete, so a discussion is not necessary. K@rl (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- It should be documented in Category:German FOP cases, as it is theoretically possible that Germany changes its law someday. --A.Savin 19:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- If you are the photograph, why do not set a speedy delete, so a discussion is not necessary. K@rl (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's not from outside. I am the photographer of this image, so I know what I'm saying. --A.Savin 08:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of probably copyrightable interior (the Dumont Carré was built in the 2000s) and German FoP is only applicable for external views of buildings. So, unfortunately, I cannot host this photo on Commons. A.Savin 13:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused file. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of probably copyrightable interior (Kanzlerbungalow was built by Sep Ruf who died in 1982) and German FoP is only applicable for external views of buildings. So, unfortunately, I cannot host this photo on Commons. A.Savin 13:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, I would say, that the interior does not surpass threshold of originality, but ... uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Clearly a commercial image. Doing a Google Search By Image brings up multiple uses of this image on other web sites. Pixabay user has hundreds of other unrelated commercial images on their site. GRuban (talk) 13:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Kommentar As the uploader just commenting. Does any other site propose all versions of the photo up to the highest 3498 x 4950 1.8 MB as the source site https://pixabay.com/ru/женщина-мопед-модель-692790/ ? That was my reason to believe the copyright claim. But nothing else is known to me about the author: that was the reason to upload a medium quality copy and to request a license review right after the upload. Just observing other photos in the collection I see a set of different scenery photos with non publicly recognisable people (girl sitting, people walking etc.) A possible set for a professional photographer with a possible situation of his/her will to propagate them under CC0. --NeoLexx (talk) 17:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, http://profol.io/kevinschmitz has that size. Other instances of the image (at a smaller size) include https://500px.com/photo/98438235/kevin-schmitz-by-kevin-michael-schmitz and https://picoolio.net/image/40i which is marked as belonging to a user Kevinschmitz. Due to this, I somehow suspect this photo may well belong to a person named Kevin Schmitz. Given that, I guess it is possible he is also the owner of the Russian language Pixabay that is releasing the image - but I will believe that when I see the US presidential runoff between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. --GRuban (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- > US presidential runoff between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump Fairly fair :-) everything except the postulate that everything coming from a Russian is stolen ipso facto of the nationality of the provider. I mean some factual facts atop of "he is Russian"? I am really open minded for anything except purely national or country accusations in non-political issues. --NeoLexx (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- О боже. The postulate is no more or less than that the pixabay user 873770 is not Kevin Michael Schmitz. Or, rather, that we do not have any positive evidence that he is. And plenty of suggestive evidence that he isn't. --GRuban (talk) 00:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have to agree that this is the same photo: https://500px.com/photo/98438235/ Uploaded there 6 months ago, attributed to Kevin M. Schmitz, lifestyle photographer, w/o any exact licenses or usage requests. The later doesn't smell good to me at all, so for the sake of the HM Precautionary principle :-) it might be better to delete until a OTRS ticket provided from Schmitz.
This photo currently doesn't have any particular use at ru-wiki. I proposed it once for a ru-wiki discussion about the Commons Picture of the day politics — with colored pipes and insects people were getting sick tired by that time... So no damage for a Wikipedia article from this DR. --NeoLexx (talk) 10:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have to agree that this is the same photo: https://500px.com/photo/98438235/ Uploaded there 6 months ago, attributed to Kevin M. Schmitz, lifestyle photographer, w/o any exact licenses or usage requests. The later doesn't smell good to me at all, so for the sake of the HM Precautionary principle :-) it might be better to delete until a OTRS ticket provided from Schmitz.
- О боже. The postulate is no more or less than that the pixabay user 873770 is not Kevin Michael Schmitz. Or, rather, that we do not have any positive evidence that he is. And plenty of suggestive evidence that he isn't. --GRuban (talk) 00:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- > US presidential runoff between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump Fairly fair :-) everything except the postulate that everything coming from a Russian is stolen ipso facto of the nationality of the provider. I mean some factual facts atop of "he is Russian"? I am really open minded for anything except purely national or country accusations in non-political issues. --NeoLexx (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, http://profol.io/kevinschmitz has that size. Other instances of the image (at a smaller size) include https://500px.com/photo/98438235/kevin-schmitz-by-kevin-michael-schmitz and https://picoolio.net/image/40i which is marked as belonging to a user Kevinschmitz. Due to this, I somehow suspect this photo may well belong to a person named Kevin Schmitz. Given that, I guess it is possible he is also the owner of the Russian language Pixabay that is releasing the image - but I will believe that when I see the US presidential runoff between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. --GRuban (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the decision was made simpler by fact, that the photo has no educational value and is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Epi Pancan (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- C'est au nom de Françoise Briand que Marie-Laure Coudron, qui a été sur sa liste aux élections municipales de 2014. C'est donc une demande du staff officiel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napoleonturenne (talk • contribs) Matiia (talk) 21:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC) (UTC)
- The author is not the uploader. The photographer did not explicitly approval to share this photo under a free license Epi Pancan (talk) 15:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work. Incorrect date, incorrect author and incorrect license. Photographie: René Milanese, 1976, ¿own work of BastienM in 2013!? (he was born in 1986), ¿cc-by-sa?! . HombreDHojalata.talk 07:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know what I'm supposed to do in this case. The photo was taken in 1976 by my grandfather, deceased years ago. So he can't give me the autorisation of publication... I have made a scan of this potograph and I am the heir of these. So, what license can I use ? --BastienM (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- OK. Then, it is necessary change "date" (->1976), "source" (->familiar archive) and "author" (->René Milanese), for example (in all photos in this situation). . HombreDHojalata.talk 09:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- But..., if René Milanese is your grandfather, usally the heir is of your father and their brothers and sisters, not yours BastienM... --Elisardojm (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: copyright paranoia. If uploader possesses the photo, (s)he is the heir. @BastienM: please update the description as per User:HombreDHojalata. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no source (No source since)... but I found this image at http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20100115/manhattan/fbi-hopes-times-square-billboard-will-help-catch-fugitives dated to 2010 (and http://www.vosizneias.com/47071/2010/01/15/manhattan-ny-times-square-billboard-to-display-fbi-most-wanted/) and identified to FBI. The image there is the same 28Kb size as this one. Would the consensus thus be to keep it as an FBI work? However, on page http://atlantic.tv-sign.ru/en/2010/8.html, the photo credit is to SanLuisObisbo.com. I was unable to find that photo on that website. I did however find a bigger version of this image at (http://file2.answcdn.com/answ-cld/image/upload/w_760,c_fill,g_faces:center,q_60/v1401340263/dzirbfmmibtyafwwmqey.jpg) and would suggest that if this is kept, the larger version be uploaded instead. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Kommentar this is not a straight-on photograph. Hence the photographer retains the right to it. I agree that the internet sites have been sloppy in their own attribution and thus we do not know who the photographer is. However, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Justix99; was the photograph of the individual actually taken by the FBI? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Kommentar I don't know if the FBI took the base image, and agree it's not straight on. I converted it from no source because I found a source. Whether it's ok to keep or not, still has to be decided by consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear (c) status. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded in good faith, but this is an anonymous photograph from a website of a 3D object (a seal), and is subject to copyright under US law Hchc2009 (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- photo is anonymous from 1899, and 3D object from 1370. Mathiasrex (talk) 13:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- can you update the file and the licensing tags accordingly, and include the original publication date? (That'll be essential for the U.S. copyright - an anonymous, unpublished US photograph is copyright for 120 years after creation.) Hchc2009 (talk) 17:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Mathiasrex, did you have any luck finding evidence that the image was originally published? As noted above, otherwise it is still under copyright in the US until 2019. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- can you update the file and the licensing tags accordingly, and include the original publication date? (That'll be essential for the U.S. copyright - an anonymous, unpublished US photograph is copyright for 120 years after creation.) Hchc2009 (talk) 17:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably still under (c). Com:PCP req. deletion. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Photo from a 1895 work. Why did you delete this image? A photo of a 14th century object. OMG. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded in good faith, but the image appears to have been taken from a book. A depiction (e.g. drawing, or photograph) of a 3D image such as a seal carries its own copyright under US law, and no author/source is given. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Published in 1895. Nagy Lajos elsõ nagy pecsétje Pór Antal - Schönherr Gyula: Az Anjou-ház és örökösei In: A magyar nemzet története. Szerkesztette: Szilágyi Sándor Athéneum, Budapest, 1895, III. kötet, 222-223. old. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded in good faith, but the image appears to have been taken from a book. A depiction (e.g. drawing, or photograph) of a 3D image such as a seal carries its own copyright under US law, and no author/source is given. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . Published 1895. Nagy Lajos második pecsétje Pór Antal - Schönherr Gyula: Az Anjou-ház és örökösei In: A magyar nemzet története. Szerkesztette: Szilágyi Sándor Athéneum, Budapest, 1895, III. kötet, 264. old. utáni tábla Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
