Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/06/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 18th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality image of a heap of cash Takeaway (talk) 04:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web grab anyway. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality image of a heap of cash. No idea how this can be educationally used. Takeaway (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web grab anyway. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 04:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 04:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 04:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: cover clearly states the author and the copyright notice. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 04:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete I found the source for this album cover which has no evidence of permission to license it as tagged. The copyright is probably owned by the artist, their record company or the designer or photographer. An OTRS verification is needed to keep here but could be moved to enwiki as a non-free image for the article about that specific album. Ww2censor (talk) 15:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:WLM14ES - 14072008 185851 31166 - .jpg Joanbanjo (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:August Fish Harbour Cadaques Cataluna Costa Brava - Mythos Spain Photographie 1991 - panoramio.jpg Joanbanjo (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy with no improvement of File:LatinEmpire.png. Uploader has not attributed source, and falsely claims creation date in 1994, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Genuine map of the Latin Empire.png. --Holder (talk) 04:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: re-uploaded. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: multiple socks. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, copies on the web, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: re-uploaded - obvious socking Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by James ville. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate|File:Habitat du néolithique sur la rive du lac de Banyoles.jpg Joanbanjo (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File versions merged, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free picture and license is wrong too. Picture is from elfen-lied wikia.Zoranzoki21 (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

marketing. out of scope. Austriantraveler (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the same inage as the last one of the same name, but exactly the smae arguments apply. This is an unused personal image. It is claimed that it is "won work" but it does not appear to be a selfie. The uploader is a nuisance rule-breaker. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and escalated previous block. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That's my old picture, I don't want it to be available on internet anymore. Best regards Maja Tokarska 203.153.101.244 21:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You are not the photographer and can't request deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That's my old picture, I don't want it to be available on internet anymore. Best regards Maja Tokarska 203.153.101.244 21:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion, you are not the author and can't request deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist died in 2016. This file has {{PD-old}} which is just nonsense. Keeping it will require a free license from the artist's heirs via OTRS. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Martino Guidobono Cavalchini.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Regardless of whether OTRS permission comes in from the heir of the sculptor, as a photograph of a 3D work, we would also need permission from the photographer, Antonio Maniscalco. Speedying as the uploader has continually shown a blatant disregard for honoring others' copyrights, pushing this over the threshold to be clearly a copyright violation and therefore a speedy candidate per COM:CSD. --Storkk (talk) 23:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have update with most recent file. EDU Bangladesh (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by confirmed sockpuppet and globally locked.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 18:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist: Mass deletion of pages added by Wikibandd

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by confirmed sockpuppet and globally locked.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 18:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist: Mass deletion of pages added by Wikibandd

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: processed and redirected. Daphne Lantier 16:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: processed and redirected. Daphne Lantier 16:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: processed and redirected. Daphne Lantier 16:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: processed and redirected. Daphne Lantier 16:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a part of a video made by Mnet. It seems to be under exclusive copyright. Motoko C. K. (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the photographer, and I'll hope the information about the picture is on the correct place now. Knut (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Jcb (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly wrong license. Unsure about the age of the logos. If the age can't be determined the files can't be kept.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The shield was designed by Canadian illustrator Thoreau MacDonald who died in 1989, so it most certainly is still under copyright. The shield is already available under the fair use policy on the English Wikipedia at File:Dartmouth College shield.svg which specifies that the logo is being used under the fair use doctrine. --odder (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Commons is not Facebook.

Leyo 20:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Denniss. --JuTa 02:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotion/big watermarks/altered photos - no educational value

INeverCry 03:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamisonedd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadir Hayat Khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality unreal sunsets

/St1995 15:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darkopolis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

JPEG logos, no evidence of a free license, not own works, no permission. Should be SVG anyway.

Yann (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Buildings are copyrighted. In some parts of the world, there are exceptions in copyright law for items visible from public places. These exceptions are called Freedom of Panorama. France has no such exceptions, and thus photos of architectural works in France are encumbered by the copyrights of the underlying works and can only be hosted here if the underlying architecture has fallen into the public domain or has been licensed freely itself. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tourist selfies in front of tourist's sights, encyclopaedic use unlikely. In most cases there are equivalent images of the same scene from the same photographer.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tourist selfies in front of tourist's sights, encyclopaedic use unlikely. In most cases there are equivalent images of the same scene from the same photographer.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tourist selfies in front of tourist's sights, encyclopaedic use unlikely. In most cases there are equivalent images of the same scene from the same photographer.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tourist selfies in front of tourist's sights, encyclopaedic use unlikely. In most cases there are equivalent images of the same scene from the same photographer.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tourist selfies in front of tourist's sights, encyclopaedic use unlikely. In most cases there are equivalent images of the same scene from the same photographer.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tourist selfies in front of tourist's sights, encyclopaedic use unlikely. In most cases there are equivalent images of the same scene from the same photographer.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 01:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, was not used on any page abf «Cabale!» 22:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not filehosting Kamolan (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't really look in scope --DieBuche (talk) 03:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 11:07, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Affiche' cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:20, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Affiche' cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 00:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission (No permission since) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiven2240: I don't see anything wrong. Am I missing something? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE -> Too abstract to be of any educational use Takeaway (talk) 04:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:20, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. —Cryptic (talk) 04:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:20, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 04:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NJ does not release its images under a free license. MB298 (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NJ does not release its images under a free license. MB298 (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PA does not release its images under a free license. MB298 (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 05:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 06:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 06:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to suggest this file has free license Kamolan (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting, unclear license Kamolan (talk) 07:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 07:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting, unclear license Kamolan (talk) 07:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting, unclear license Kamolan (talk) 07:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 07:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license, scanned photo made before 1989 Kamolan (talk) 07:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IshaanJajodia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, takes aim probably not own work anyway.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to suggest this work has PD license Kamolan (talk) 07:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting, unclear license Kamolan (talk) 07:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion request by the uploader Motoko C. K. (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Subject ambiguous. No descriptions. Dubious educational value. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist doppelt enthalten und besitzt weniger Info als das andere. Weblink zum anderen Foto: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rothenburg_ob_der_Tauber,_91541_Rothenburg_ob_der_Tauber,_Germany_-_panoramio.jpg Rosty (talk) 07:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You nominated the wrong version. --Sitacuisses (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Sitacuisses. Daphne Lantier 19:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely recreation od previously deleted file. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fontaine Stravinski — Racconish ☎ 09:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crude drawing of flag of a place that has no Google hits. No educational use. No categories, no useful description. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copyvio from some random book. Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (low quality porn) Rocky Wyngaard (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- It's less "porn" than many thousands of other images on Commons. It's a little heavy-handed with the softening haze, but that was a deliberately chosen artistic effect... AnonMoos (talk) 04:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per AnonMoos. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (COM:PEN​IS). I can't link to the policy because of the abuse filter, even reporting the error is impossible.--Rocky Wyngaard (talk) 10:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

​out of scope (COM:PE​NIS) Rocky Wyngaard (talk) 10:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (COM:PE​NIS) Rocky Wyngaard (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This range map is unsourced and wrong. Because no pages are using it I propose to delete it.-- Rocky Wyngaard (talk) 10:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this copy of a newspaper page is public domain as claimed Nthep (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is Mbarrach, the uploader of the coy [sic] in question. I am impressed that this document has now come to the attention of someone who believes it deserves attention. On the matter of Alan E. Freedman, all of the images I uploaded to commons.wikimedia several years ago were obtained online when possible to verify documents and images which had been collected by Mr. Freedman and/or his descendants. When not, I scanned the available documents. In this case, it appears that I was unable to find 35 year-old archives of the Hollywood Reporter. While the document in question (obit in Hollywood Reporter) may not meet the incredibly extensive requirements of the reviewer, I believe that it certainly meets Wiki standards when placed in context of entire Freedman commons collection, including the engraved copy of the cancelled check that Freedman wrote to Fox March 30, 1932. Accordingly, I challenge any attempts to delete any images in the collection and the associated footnotes in the article. I am about to board a plane and will be mostly unable to pursue this matter further for the next 10 days. If my challenge is not deemed sufficient, I request a delay until July 1 to enable me to respond more thoroughly.

Thank you for pointing out my typo (now fixed). The relevance of the document is not the issue - the issue is whether or not the copyright of the Hollywood Reporter is being breached or not. You labelled this scan as being in the public domain without giving any reason why this is the case. Nthep (talk) 16:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To add, to be used as a footnote in the Wikipedia article on Freedman, the Report obituary does not have to be on-line, it just has to be referenced accurately in the article in which case issue number, date, page would suffice see w:WP:REFB. Nthep (talk) 13:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, bitte löschen. War anscheinend ein Programmfehler im Uploadprogramm --Tilman2007 (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist ein Duplikat Rosty (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

worse version of File:LuhanskPeoplesRepublic.svg.png Glovacki (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep SVG version is more usuful and appropriate. «SVG.PNG» version is bad variant of uploading information about Lugansk PR. To admin:  Delete File:LuhanskPeoplesRepublic.svg.png! To Glovacki: Update SVG file or request it on talk page. ← Alex Great talkrus? 07:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: png version deleted. Daphne Lantier 19:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that the author of this photograph died more than 70 years ago and no United States public domain tag, which is explicitly required by the selected PD template. (An alternative rationale, such as {{Anonymous-EU}}, would require evidence that the photo was published anonymously – not just that the uploader doesn't know who created it.) LX (talk, contribs) 12:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated source is "Camila Cabello", looks like part of a photoshoot. There is no evidence that this was released by Cabello or her management/label under CC-BY-SA. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
12:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

自分が描いたものでは無いので。他に自分が描いたものをアップしました。 Ktmchi (talk) 12:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work this source is copyright. Pitpisit (talk) 12:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTHOST: holiday photo Takeaway (talk) 12:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTHOST: holiday photo Takeaway (talk) 12:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free image for living person, also see here --Alaa :)..! 13:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 13:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright/publish not exceed 50 years. Pitpisit (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright/publish not exceed 50 years. Pitpisit (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest, EugeneZelenko. This is my family photo. This is the only photo we have of Edward due to circumstances in history including the civil war destruction of Middleton Place. Knowing the exact date is impossible. He is pictured as a captain so we can narrow the time frame.


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Israel Paredes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://cdn.forbes.com.mx/2017/06/IMG_7113.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is this coat of arms under a free license? Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 14:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is this coat of arms under a free license? Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 14:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alex therd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios!

/St1995 14:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep They look like private photos to me. Is there a concrete reason to assume they are they are copyvios? --Jahobr (talk) 15:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes. I noticed that in 2015-16 a lot of images from Facebook was uploaded in Pakistan-related categories. They are small images without EXIF data, the uploader's only contributions. Even if these files are not copyvios they have very bad quality and out of scope. /St1995 15:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am opposed to "bad quality" argument too. These images are likely some of the best images we will ever get from 1997 Pakistan. --Jahobr (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ОК. I can AGF. I believe that all of these images was created before 2000, so please keep them except 3 and 5 - unused personal files. /St1995 18:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. You should have called this request: "I want these files gone; by whatever reason necessary" :-) 3 shows two bridges; keep --Jahobr (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Jahobr. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaiduwala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bad quality and likely copyvios

/St1995 14:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sajjad Altaf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios!

/St1995 15:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is unknown (to me), but their permission is needed. Milena dj, who is claimed to be the author, is just the original uploader. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the uploader, I am no longer sure of the permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namiba (talk • contribs) 2017-06-16T17:57:26‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerned that such a complex image may have a "selection and arrangement" copyright rather than PD-simple. en:File:Santos Futebol Clube (AP).png is used as fair use and similar Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out Of Scope.this is snap photo and that fuzzy. eien20 (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of the Wilhelm-von-Oranien-Schule should not be publicly available in high resolution in order to prevent misuse and manipulation. 91.53.129.252 15:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

speedy  Keep Incomprehensible reasoning. Hystrix (talk) 16:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Die Schule will Manipulation und Missbrauch des Logos vermeiden. Daniel12l (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schon verstanden. Einmal hochgeladen, vor über einem Jahr. Vermutlich ist das Logo jetzt nicht nur auf commons zu finden. Um „... Manipulation und Missbrauch des Logos [zu] vermeiden ...“ würde ich vorschlagen, allen Schülern und Lehrern der WvO-Schule die Nutzung des Internets sowie Whatsapp, Facebook, Instagram etc. zu verbieten. Natürlich schnell Keep Hystrix (talk) 05:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete This image looks like flickrwashing to me as it was just uploaded from a Flick account that has just one image and no metadata, but the FlickreviewR bot reviewed it as cc-nc-nd-2.0 and now on Flickr it is licensed cc-sa-2.0. However Google Images finds it was here previously and deleted as File:Parque de la aviacion militar.jpg. A higher resolution version of the image is found on this webpage as a Panoramio image attributed to "Griecy" http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/33419312.jpg Ww2censor (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lost Whispers (talk • contribs) 2017-06-16T19:18:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AMERICAN MALACOLOGICAL BULLETIN, volume 22(1/2) is copyrighted. The page reads: https://archive.org/stream/americanmalac22122007amer/#page/n0/mode/1up Copyright © 2007 by the American Malacologica Society. - While the source items details page https://archive.org/details/americanmalac22122007amer reads: "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0". There is need to research copyright status of all images in the Category:American_malacological_bulletin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snek01 (talk • contribs) 2017-06-14T22:05:56‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Kevinpauza

[edit]

Images used in the uploader's Wikipedia page, an autobiography and advertisement for his services. The first three photos are images of the uploader that are not "own work" as claimed and may be the property of professional photographers. They need credits to the photographers and evidence that the uploader has permission to license and distribute them. The fourth is clearly not "own work" and has authorship and copyright information in the metadata. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:DMBioLtd

[edit]

Advertising/promotion of a business by a single-purpose account. The files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3 files, 3 high end DSLRs, one with a different name in EXIF. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 16:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any use Takeaway (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any use Takeaway (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 153.169.22.198 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.matatufestival.org/king-britt/ HR with EXIF, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vojtěch Dostál as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: year 1923, http://www.pametnaroda.cz/witness/photo/id/387?locale=cs_CZ Yann (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vojtěch Dostál as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: passport picture from 1940's Bohmen und Mahren Nazi Germany. I don't think these could be considered PD-GOV could they? Yann (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vojtěch Dostál as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: orphan work from 1945, unlikely to be free Yann (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shamspeyman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uncertain copyright, probably out of scope.

Yann (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, vacation photo, the uploader's only contribution, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Simple enough? Yann (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Simple enough? Yann (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image uploaded by user. Ashish979 (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Picture from the 1920s. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned image, please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 17:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned image, please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 17:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this is Portrait of Well-Known Persian Singer (Fataneh solymani) on 90s. --DejaVu (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Bogus license. EU-anonymous is in general not usable for Germany. Also no date is given, but Western Germany, as stated in the description field, did not exist before 1949. Jcb (talk) 17:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, Jcb, for the request; the file should be deleted indeed because it is apparently a dublication of efforts. There exist a similar file of better quality with the Krumnack factory letter head on wikimedia commons with more appropriate credentials: i.e. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%B6belfabrik_krumnack_.jpg --Dirk-Franz (talk) 12:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting Kamolan (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information (conflicting licenses). Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 17:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Kamolan (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not file hosting, unclear license Kamolan (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 17:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 17:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DejaVu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, and old images tagged as CC-BY-SA without evidence. Please upload the original images, and/or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized HD format, no location, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 17:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, missing location, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized (HD) format, no location, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 17:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 17:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 18:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Corthompson23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three different crops of the same photo of a subject with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in en:Creating Accelerated Laboratory and Hospital Relocations, which has been deleted as spam. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing camera metadata, and metadata indicating that the files were grabbed from social media sites.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 18:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet of Alex9777777 and globally locked recent sock. This uploader has been confirmed by checkuser.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 18:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stephan.dedalus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are highly unlikely to be own, especially considering the fact this is the cover to Ahmad Jafari & Associates report

Elisfkc (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faheemifti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

-remplacement par le fichier File:Bus à haut niveau de service de Douai 2010 - 2014.svg

Le nouveau fichier est corrigé pour le nom.

Il est en SVG et la taille du fichier a été réduite.

Dldwg (talk) 18:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remplacement par le fichier File:Bus à haut niveau de service de Douai 2010 - 2014.svg

Le nouveau fichier est corrigé pour le nom.

Il est en SVG et la taille du fichier a été réduite.

Dldwg (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remplacement par le fichier Bus à haut niveau de service de Douai 2014 - ajd.svg Le nouveau fichier est corrigé pour le nom. Il est en SVG et la taille du fichier a été réduite. Dldwg (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 18:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work: has watermark from commercial website in the corner, known license laundering account (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:- panoramio (1).jpg) 79.251.133.235 18:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop of File:Peterskirche-(Kirchheimbolanden)-02.JPG, no foreseeable use 79.251.133.235 18:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop of File:Kirchheimbolanden-Paulskirche-01.JPG, no foreseeable use 79.251.133.235 18:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused crop of File:Kirchheimbolanden-Paulskirche-12.JPG, no foreseeable use 79.251.133.235 18:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, pls see also related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date of publication, so that the copyright situation cannot be determined. Jcb (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Let it go as there are plenty of recent photographs of the historic district. Farragutful (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a screen shot of the TV show. It's not under the free license. Motoko C. K. (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing informations filled in. 2003:62:440D:6848:60E6:152C:B4A6:E332 21:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide some evidence that this version of the CoA is really authored by the Freistaat Bayern. Some happy guesswork is not helpful. Jcb (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it <PA removed>. 2003:62:440D:6858:B022:2ECE:3CED:6867 19:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no apparent notability on this " English: Music art cover. Mobile stream" Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO on this image with inserted drawing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    19:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Chetanjb

[edit]

Logos uploaded for self-promotion/advertising by a single-purpose account; the files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC) If doesn't comply with Wiki policies, request you to please remove the image from Wikipedia Commons portal.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Mandyada Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir 32.jpg , DR started to verify claimed 'own work': personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, pls see also related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Mandyada Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir 32.jpg et al, DR started to verify claimed 'own work': personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, pls see also related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per File:Mandyada Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir 32.jpg et al, DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, pls see also related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. —Cryptic (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, blurry and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused commercial logo, from deleted article w:Draft:Wake, Inc.. —Cryptic (talk) 20:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy-vio as per the summary of the file itself. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is not a page MonalisaHeadley (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a photo of a painting. Without information about the authorship of the painting, it's not at all clear that this image is free. Whpq (talk) 20:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free image for living person (see here) --Alaa :)..! 20:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free image for living person (see here) --Alaa :)..! 20:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The building is the main subject. 67.84.96.111 21:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfortunately, impossible PD-old for a photograph taken in 1990s or later... Pibwl (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from http://zazsila.ru/news/2011-02-05-29 , no evidence it's free and the site is copyrighted. Pibwl (talk) 21:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work, sole upload. Google gives one bigger copy without an inscription [1], though I can't find it on a given page. Pibwl (talk) 21:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 22:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, sole upl Pibwl (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://diffusionph.cccommunication.biz/jpgok/Repmr/564/564829_14.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio from [2] (2nd photo in a slideshow). File:20130410173556 mor3.jpg is therefore also suspected (small size), although google indicates only Pinterest and one later use, with credits to Wikipedia uploader [3]. Pibwl (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore PAnd0rA Overdose (talk) 22:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably taken from [4], marked as copyright Armee de l'Air. The user has other copyvio problem. Pibwl (talk) 22:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google doesn't show anything similar, but doubtful own work, in view of thumbnail quality and 2 copyvio problems in other files Pibwl (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alfred Pellan is dead in 1988. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.43.35.121 22:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disneyland Paris
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 1

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoît Prieur: If it is not in France, what was it doing in Category:Disneyland Paris? Also, according to the GPS tag on the image, it is in France. Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say it is not in France: I said the topic and what it is represented is not concerned by the lack of FoP. --Benoît Prieur (d) 21:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunderklumpen: I would presume so, but that is a better question for someone on French Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This building has been destroyed in december 2010 and it seems that «The destruction of the work extinguished copyright.» Is that correct? - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, un éventuelle suppression des fichiers est à voir au cas par cas. En effet, certains équipements photographiés ne constituent pas une œuvre de l'esprit originale, lorsqu'il s'agit par exemple de la reproduction de bateaux ou de constructions anciennes. Concernant spécifiquement File:Plaque de rue Auguste-Gusteau à EuroDisney.jpg, il n'y a aucune raison de le supprimer, il s'agit de la simple reproduction à Eurodisney des milliers de plaques de rue qui existent à Paris, il n'y a aucune création originale pour cette plaque. Concernant File:Espace Euro Disney 2008.JPG, je ne vois aucune œuvre de l'esprit du point de vue architecturale à protéger ; à moins que ce soient les droits d'auteurs sur les graffitis qui justifiraient la suppression du fichier. O.Taris (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'ajoute que l'Espace Euro Disney a été détruit en 2010 (lire plus haut) et il semblerait que la destruction entraîne l'extinction des droits d'auteur. Cependant, dans l'exemple donné plus haut, il est question de peinture murale et non d'architecture. Merci @Benoît Prieur: d'avoir relevé cette exception. - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je reproduis ce que je viens d'écrire sur le bistro de #WpFr.
Quand le bâtiment est détruit le droit d'auteur ne semble plus s'appliquer et apparemment l'image est acceptable sur Commons :
"The destruction of the work extinguished copyright." => [5] sur un exemple équivalent File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Destruction of art never ended a copyright on the art itself ! Loreleil (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: I would rather have open a deletion request in order to facilitate a discussion and decision on such files that may be on the edge than to have them be sitting around and being used by others. Elisfkc (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 2

copyrighted site plans.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at them, File:Disneyland Resort Paris Kaart.png looks like there might be a chance that it came from Disney or somewhere else. The other two look like they were done in Paint. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it all. The first and the third are the same pictures and they seem to be based on a road map and the real land. There is no derivative work. - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep own work, not copyrighted. Multichill (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLRP schema.png was accidentally included. Withdrawing nomination for that image only. Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@O.Taris:
English: The topiary and the fact that there is no FOP in France. Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Français : Le topiaire et le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de FOP en France. Traduit avec Google Translate Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si on considère que les jardins et plantation sont en général soumis au droit d'auteur, on va devoir supprimer beaucoup de photos de commons... La plantation représentée sur la photo ne me parait pas particulièrement originale pour pouvoir justifier un droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we consider that the gardens and plantation are generally subject to copyright, we will have to delete many photos of commons ... The plantation shown in the picture does not seem to me particularly original to be able to justify a copyright. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 20, 22 et 6 : je ne vois pas d'oeuvre pour laquelle le droit d'auteur serait enfreint, il s'agit de simples photos de rue ou de parking. O.Taris (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2, delete the rest. Yann (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats with artistic designs have previously been deleted, if I remember right. Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These pictures were not deleted because of "boat of artistic design", but for the other elements of the settings. BTW in only two of them there is a boat. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 7

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, les arbres et autres plantations, les lampadaires quelconques, les bateaux ou les trains dans un paysage ne sont pas des bâtiments soumis au droit d'auteur dans le cadre de la liberté de panorama. On se demande même pourquoi une pauvre guitoune peut-être proposée à la suppression pour une question de droit d'auteur ! En revanche, le respect du droit d'auteur architectural se pose effectivement pour File:Sleeping Beauty's Castle Disneyland Paris - panoramio.jpg et File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (15).jpg. O.Taris (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per O.Taris above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Topiaries have been found to be copyrightable in the past. I try to nominate files like these to have a precedent set for them later. I would rather nominate 50 files that are fine and have a decision made about them than to have one that is not ok left alone. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not in France, AFAIK. Your practice doesn't help admins. It pass the burden of review to them, and they are already overbooked. It would be much more useful to carefully review your nominations before making them. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Pretty sure Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris was an example of topiaries that were deleted because of copyright in France. If not, I remember having another case at some point, I'd just need to find it. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them show some copyrightable element, and IMO, File:DLP Maze View.JPG was deleted by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go, the example of topiaries in France being deleted that I was thinking of was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 8

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (3).jpg et File:Disneyland - panoramio (15).jpg : les camions ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions,  Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (18).jpg, l'élément principal est la montagne et le HOLLYWOOD, qui ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions. O.Taris (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is  kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disneyland Paris
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disneyland Paris
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 13

Copyrighted characters

Elisfkc (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 15

No FOP in France. Moving files to correct categories, as this is too high up for most.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disneyland Paris
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 16

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 17

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all as derivative work copyright violations ({{France-cv}}). The Flickr photographers and uploaders here did not obtain permission from the architects, sculptors, graphics artists, and other authors of the copyrighted works of Euro Disney. Such permissions must be sent via COM:OTRS. French FOP doesn't suffice Commons standards because it is noncommercial, and thus doesn't adhere with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 18

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Tube Disaster cause of non originality. Delete the others. - ~~ Bzh-99 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted two, kept the other two per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]