Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant New Safe Confinement
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The New Safe Confinement was completed in 2019 by Vinci and Bouygues Travaux Publics. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, therefore permission from the architectural firms in required.
- File:Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (2015) 51.JPG
- File:Chernobyl New Safe Confinement August 2016.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 02.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 06.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 07.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 08.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 09.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 10.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 11.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 12.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 13.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 14.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 15.jpg
- File:Chernobyl second sarcophacus 2018 hnapel 16.jpg
- File:JCB vehicles in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, 2017.jpg
- File:New Safe Confinement at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant October 2016 1.jpg
- File:New Safe Confinement at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant October 2016 2.jpg
- File:New Safe Confinement March 2016.jpg
- File:New Safe Confinement Structure.jpg
- File:New-safe-confinement-April-2015-IMG 8575.jpg
- File:New-safe-confinement-April-2015-IMG 8747.jpg
- File:NSC 2017.jpg
- File:NSC Sept 2017.jpg
- File:NSC September2017.jpg
- File:NSC stack close-up.jpg
- File:NSC stack.jpg
- File:NSC-Oct-2017.jpg
- File:Sarkofag IMG 5094.jpg
- File:Tsjernobyl-Sarcofaag.jpg
- File:URFF-0144 Арка.jpg
- File:View of Chernobyl Reactor 4 with New Safe Confinement Facility at Rear - Chernobyl Exclusion Zone - Northern Ukraine (26825573250).jpg
- File:View of New Safe Confinement Facility with Sign - Chernobyl Exclusion Zone - Northern Ukraine (26494248434).jpg
- File:View of Safe Confinement Facility for Reactor 4 - Chernobyl Exclusion Zone - Northern Ukraine (26494247464).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Are all buildings protected? To me the New Safe Confinement looks like a purely utilitarian design, with little signs of the specific architect's personal touch. –LPfi (talk) 16:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with the remark raised by User:LPfi, from the perspective of the author of some of the contested pictures. It would be difficult to argue there is architectural value in the design of the NSC or any other structures erected to assist in the decommissioning of the enclosed Shelter and dismantling of what remains of Reactor 4 inside.
- In this context, the NSC and its associated structures are likely also exempt under Ukrainian Law because:
- ...it shall be permitted without the consent of the author (or other copyright holder) and with mandatory indication of the author's name and of the source of borrowing: ... to reproduce, in order to highlight current events by means of photography or cinematography, to carry out public notification or other public communication of the works seen or heard in the course of such events to the extent justified by the informational purpose.[3792-XII/199-2017 Art.21(4)]
- Because the decommissioning and dismantling of the Shelter and entombed reactor are ongoing activities, and the NSC is a purely functional temporary construction for that purpose, photographs are covered under this provision to inform the general public about the situation at ChNPP. ArticCynda (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep A safe confinement doesn't show any distinctive architectural features. Based on the above Ukrainian law, NSC is below COM:TOO and we can get rid of copyright concern --218.103.33.25 03:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with LPfi that this is just an ordinary confinement cover. Shouldn't have any copyright issues. --101.78.190.130 04:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: it is utilitarian architecture, with no distinctive or creative elements. Such nominations are distruptive. Ruthven (msg) 10:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)