Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Rizal Shrine, Intramuros

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Rizal Shrine, Intramuros

[edit]

statues and busts might not enjoy freedom of pano exemption as the shrine building itself does. no freedom of pano in the phils that allows all and free forms of reuse of photos of copyrighted bldgs and sculptures that doesnt compromise the rights of the architects, sculptors, designers, archi firms, or their heirs within the 50 yr copyright duration period

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not good enough to say that these objects "might not enjoy freedom of pano exemption". Either they do or they don't. If you contend that they don't - and that's not your present contention - then you need to substantiate your contention. Otherwise, you haven't established that the images should be deleted. Bahnfrend (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy  Keep Rapana bulbosa shown in Rizal Shrine in Fort Santiago Dec 2011.jpg. I find amusing to say a collection falls under copyright. To be serious, @Bahnfrend: , this troll-like user should be stopped. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The shrine statue are owned by the Local and National Government, hence outside the bounds of Copyright FOPs

4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions

  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
  •  Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except one. ƏXPLICIT 12:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Rizal_Shrine,_Intramuros&oldid=539585398"