Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dokientrung

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dokientrung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:VIETNAM, these insignia are not in PD.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 15:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A similar proposal was debated and rejected over the period April 2019 to September 2019 at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD Vietnam Government. The volume of proposed deletions was so vast that it was identified that it would be better to address the proposal in smaller chunks. CdnMCG (talk) 20:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. As works of applied art, they would be in the PD in Vietnam 75 years after first publication. I guess none of them are that old, and even if some are, they would be still protected in the US per the URAA. So undeletion seems only possible for items that are shown to have been first published over 95 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 17:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dokientrung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:VIETNAM, these insignia are not in PD. However, I'm not sure whether they exceed COM:TOO or not.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 15:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A similar proposal was debated and rejected over the period April 2019 to September 2019 at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD Vietnam Government. The volume of proposed deletions was so vast that it was identified that it would be better to address the proposal in smaller chunks. CdnMCG (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is no COM:TOO Vietnam, but I'll go out on a limb here and say these are too simple to be protected by copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 17:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]