User talk:MGA73/Archive 53

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Three cousins at Delta Music Museum IMG 1209.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sennecaster (talk) 02:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

File:NAGOYA guideway bus001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

191.126.157.65 14:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Shriner's Hospital in Shreveport, LA IMG 1383.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sennecaster (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Reviews

Hi MGA73, Now that Leoboudv is not so active anymore, the list of my uploads needing review is growing. I would be very grateful if you reviewed some when you have a spare minute. You may remove reviewed ones from the list. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

@Lymantria: ✓ Done Perhaps you want to check if I missed some? --MGA73 (talk) 20:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks much, you didn't miss a single one! --Lymantria (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Gif

Hello MGA73} I hope you're doing well. Could you have a look and review File:Vidisha Srivastava.gif it. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi C1K98V! I'm doing well thank you. Hope you are too. The file look fine to me so I reviewed it. --MGA73 (talk) 17:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
This lovely dance File:Flor Vigna & Facu Mazzei Dance.gif too. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi C1K98V! Done too. --MGA73 (talk) 14:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Vimeo

Hello MGA73 I hope you're doing well. I came across this in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, and I reviewed the file manually using Template:VimeoReview. Is it allowed here on commons and did I do the correct thing right. Thanks.--C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi User:C1K98V! Yeah I do not see why it should not be allowed. Only problem is that the template mention that a bot reviewed the file. --MGA73 (talk) 06:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

HI! MGA73! Can you please review the prior licensing for this image, so as to declare it verified for future consequences!. Thannking you in advance! Wallu2 (talk) 02:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

@Wallu2: ✓ Done. The image above still need a better/direct link to source before I can review it. --MGA73 (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Kägöne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Periegetes (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi! Can you please review the license for same? Thanking you in advance.Wallu2 (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Wallu2 Sure, done! --MGA73 (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

HI! MGA73! Can you please review the license for this image, so as to declare it verified for future consequences!. Thannking you in advance! Wallu2 (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Wallu2: Hi! I could not locate the photo on the website. Perhaps you can add a better link to where I should look? --MGA73 (talk) 19:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done by MGA73. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Review

Hello MGA73 Hope you're doing great. Could you spare some moments for reviewing YouTube and Vimeo files from my Upload log, Search after 9 October :). Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Except File:Manish Goplani.jpeg not visible to me in Denmark. --MGA73 (talk) 13:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Usno.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 18:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Usno.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Deletion procedure

Hi MGA73,

You deleted this file but the deletion does not appear in the history. Please can you explain me what happened? Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: I checked the log for the file and User:Zscout370 restored the file per http://legimobile.fr/fr/jp/j/c/civ/1ere/1992/3/3/90-18081/ (see archive version). I find it a bit hard to understand from the short summary if it confirm that the light is copyrighted or if it says it is not. --MGA73 (talk) 07:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, MGA73, for the explanation.
The original text is still online on the official website of the French Law.
Very clearly, for who speaks French like me, the conclusion of the Court was, in summary: copyrighted material. Translated in English, the text says "the court of appeal held supremely that the composition of plays of light intended to reveal and underline the lines and the forms of the monument constituted an original "visual creation", and therefore a work of the mind; that this necessarily resulted for the benefit of its author in an incorporeal property right, apart from the public event on the occasion of which this work had been commissioned from him, and that any reproduction was therefore manifestly illicit".
It means the postal cards and all visual documents made under this lighting are judged illegal, under the French Law.
Thus, you were right to delete the file. See also this DR. Best greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
@Basile Morin: Yeah I have been reading the DR. We know that the specific light from 1990 (?) was copyrighted. But as I read it we do not know if all other light is also copyrighted. Since we have many files showing lights (example Category:Exterior lighting in France) I think there must be a line somewhere between copyrighted lightning an non-copyrighted lightning. The question is where it is :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Well, according to the official Eiffel Tower website, "The various illuminations of the Eiffel Tower (golden illumination, twinkling, beacon and events lighting) are protected." True also according to many reliable secondary sources. For me, this court case is also an evidence that the copyright issue should be taken seriously. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Yes but as someone pointed out they want to make money on it so of course they claim it is protected :-) --MGA73 (talk) 11:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
The company that sued and won, also wanted to make money :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Kanpur Central.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

plicit 13:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Regards, Marbletan (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stang 15:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Battle of kedah.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surijeal (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Benzol2 lb 2d.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OmenBreeze (talk) 05:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 09:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ox1997cow (talk) 15:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Help

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rudra_Soni_Photo.jpg#Licensing

Review this image Can I add it tk wikipedia article?? Devzerk (talk) 06:29, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

How to add that image?? To wiki Please help and edit that image Devzerk (talk) 06:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Devzerk, the above stated file has been tagged as Failed license review and will be deleted shortly. If you intend to upload media from external sources such as YouTube, please look at this example File:Dev Joshi.jpeg. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@Devzerk: As @C1K98V: wrote the youtube video does not have a free license. There should be a link "....more" on youtube (if on a PC it is below the number of views and above the icon for like / do not like etc.). When you click "...more" you see some text where the has to be "License Creative Commons...". If you do not see that then the video is not free.

To use a file check Commons:First_steps/Reuse#Embedding_Commons_media_in_Wikimedia_projects. --MGA73 (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Axel Dux vintage1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Review

Hello, good night, could you help me with 2 files i just uploaded youtube i want you to review the 2 files if you are available please i wait for your answer. Thank you. File:Alanis Guillen interpreta Rita em Malhação.png / File:2022-07-09 Joana de Verona é Adelaide, em Éramos Seis.png -- LeonaardoG (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

So you reviewing it I'll add it to the Wikipedia articles. -- LeonaardoG (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi LeonaardoG! I have reviewed the files :-) --MGA73 (talk) 07:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, @MGA73: , I always upload YouTube files. You could always be watching to be able to review most YouTube files need verification work. Thank you very much for your work. Check this one too please: File:2022-06-05 João Gomes.png and File:Rashid (2017).png -- LeonaardoG (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi LeonaardoG! I have reviewed the 2 new files too.
I have been busy with files on Japanese Wikipedia the last 2 years (see ja:利用者:MGA73/Status) and a few other wikis too (see m:User:MGA73/Media per wiki). So there is not much time left for me to do reviews.
It would be helpful if you could indicate where in the video you took the still image from. Like 1m 47s or 1:47. Or even better add it to the url like Sapna Pabbi or use the template YouTube: Ardaas Karaan Interview Sapna Pabbi talking about her second Punjabi film with Gippy grewal (Time: 00.34) – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today. --MGA73 (talk) 11:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: , I took the screenshot on my notebook called "Captura e Esboço" it is an official Microsoft application see this link: Windows application. You asked me to send this video file but I don't see a license available to send it. I would like to send this file to you. But I don't think it has a compatible license. LeonaardoG (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Hello again! I'm not asking how you made the screenshot but where in the youtube video the screenshot was from. Example Special:Diff/673052089 where I added &t=6s because I think the screenshot was taken about 6 seconds in the video. --MGA73 (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: Yes, I will pay more attention to these details so please check it one more time :) Always stay tuned I always upload YouTube files.
File:2019-08-31 Márcio Bonfim no Jornal Nacional.png
File:MC Poze do Rodo.png
File:Raí Saia Rodada 2022-2-07-10.png
File:Raí (Saia Rodada).png
File:Julia Dalavia no Portal ArteBlitz 2019.png these are the last uploads in the last few days. -- LeonaardoG (talk) 17:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Done! --MGA73 (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, @MGA73: , Sorry to bother you but there are only last uploaded files left:
File:João Gomes Caruaru - PE São João 2022-07-10.png
File:Conde Só Brega - 2022-07-10 144101.png :). -- LeonaardoG (talk) 22:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: I reviewed the second one but are you sure that uploader is the photographer of the first one? It is a combination of videos of João Gomes and someone commenting on it. --MGA73 (talk) 12:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Yes, @MGA73: , check for no errors is under a valid license. Don't worry about it, it's a channel that comments on artists but is always related to these musicians. Please note that the video is under a valid attribution license. Coming soon, I will upload more YouTube, files I would like you to watch my edits for you to check. --LeonaardoG (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@LeonaardoG: yes the license is fine. What worries me is who is the photographer of the video of João Gomes. If you check the first few seconds of the video there is a man in the bottom of the video tranlating for deaf people. Same guy can be found on other videos for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KSwm-tP6hg . If Emerson yslley worry about deaf people why not also have the guy translating the speach?

Also on the video João Gomes wears a shirt with pockets on the chest. The file on Commons shows no pockets on the chest. So where in the video is the still image from? --MGA73 (talk) 06:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

@MGA73: , I think, i made a mistake when editing YouTube videos I made a small mistake I'm sure this image is not from that video. I come to apologize. I will load again. Propose this one for deletion please. Thanks. -- LeonaardoG (talk) 13:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Deleted. --MGA73 (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: , Review new files.
File:(1) João Gomes no Café de La Musque Brasília, 2021-10-16.png
File:MC Cabelinho.png -- LeonaardoG (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Done! Please remember to add time frame and review template :-) --MGA73 (talk) 08:52, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your work on the files it was very important, i have more files to check. I really need your help @MGA73: . -- LeonaardoG (talk) 16:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: , Please verify this file: File:Priscils Senna, 2022-07-23.jpg uploaded from Vimeo is under a valid license. -- Leonaardog (talk) 03:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Done! --MGA73 (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, @MGA73: , I'll leave this comment to check the file: [1]. Soon I will mark your name and the file for you to check ok. -- Leonaardog (talk) 21:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Done! --MGA73 (talk) 08:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Here are some sample files for you to check, please.
File:Shismênia Oliveira TV BrasilGov.jpg
File:2022 TV BrasilGov.jpg
File:Gabriella Noronha - 2022 TV BrasilGov.jpg
File:Érica Pinheiro Repórter TV BrasilGov.jpg
File:2022 TV BrasilGov - Vanessa Casalino.jpg
File:2022 Jéssica Gonçalves TV BrasilGov Repórter.jpg -- Leonaardog (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

@LeonaardoG: Done! --MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

@MGA73: Check the files please.
File:(1) Rael da Rima - Coração Ao Vivo (Auditório Ibirapuera 15-12-2013).jpg
File:Rael - Aurora Boreal "Medley Acústica" - ONErpm Studios (SP) Sessions.jpg
File:"2022-08-16" Rael - "Aurora Boreal" - ONErpm Studios SP.jpg -- Leonaardog (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@LeonaardoG: Done! --MGA73 (talk) 15:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@MGA73: Check File:Fred Zero Quatro no programa TVE RS 03-04-2017 - Radar.png -- Leonaardog (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Done. Please remember to add time frame so I know where in video to look. --MGA73 (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: Okay, I'll keep an eye on these details.
This source is from the Government of Brazil and has a license I'm warning you that the site is in Portuguese you will have to translate to be aware - File:Kobra 28571368065 o.jpg. -- Leonaardog (talk) 06:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Check - File:Kobra 27954163754 o.jpg. -- Leonaardog (talk) 03:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@LeonaardoG: Done. --MGA73 (talk) 07:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: Check - File:João Gomes.jpg. -- Leonaardog (talk) 19:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
File:2022-08-2022 - Márcia Fernandes TV BrasilGov Brasília, DF.jpg. -- Leonaardog (talk) 20:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: File:Praça Rio Branco, Recife - PE.jpg/ File:2019-05-11 - Elizabeth George.jpg - Check. -- Leonaardog (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Done. --MGA73 (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Check - File:2012-08-20 - Duane Stephenson.jpg -- Leonaardog (talk) 00:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
@LeonaardoG: Done. --MGA73 (talk) 12:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi @MGA73: please archive our conversations as the redirect to my name has been deleted. :( -- Leonaardog (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Leonaardog! A bot will archive old discussions after 31 days but the counter reset every time you make a new entry. If you start a new topic at the bottom this one will be archived. --MGA73 (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Review

Here is a new thread for when I need you to review uploaded files from YouTube and Vimeo. Thank you so much for your attention I really admire your work keep being such a helpful person. -- Leonaardog (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Check: File:Zé Vaqueiro 2020.jpg -- Leonaardog (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
@MGA73: File:"18-12-2018 "Marcos Willians Herbas Camacho.jpg -- Leonaardog (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Greater Sydney map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:8003:390C:9400:D106:BB57:5878:B623 06:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

File:South African-Money01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)