Next Article in Journal
Effects of Drought at Anthesis on Flag Leaf Physiology and Gene Expression in Diverse Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptome-Wide Genetic Variations in the Legume Genus Leucaena for Fingerprinting and Breeding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on Root Production and Turnover of Stipa breviflora Community in Desert Steppe

1
Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco-Hydrology National Observation and Research Station, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
2
Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources of the Ministry of Education, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
3
Arong Banner Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Arong Banner 162750, China
4
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
5
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(7), 1521; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071521
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 July 2024 / Published: 12 July 2024

Abstract

:
Organic carbon in grassland mainly exists in the soil, and root production and turnover play important roles in carbon input into the soil. However, the effects of climate change on plant root dynamics in desert steppe are unknown. We conducted an experiment in a desert steppe, which included ambient temperature (T0); temperature increased by 2 °C (T1); temperature increased by 4 °C (T2); natural precipitation (P0); precipitation increased by 25% (P1); precipitation increased by 50% (P2); and the interaction between warming and increased precipitation. Plant community aboveground characteristics; root production; and root turnover were measured. We found that the root length production of the T0P2; T1P1; T2P0; and T2P1 treatments were significantly higher than that of the T0P0 treatment, with an increment of 98.70%, 11.72%, 163.03%, and 85.14%, respectively. Three treatments with temperature increased by 2 °C (T1P0; T1P1; and T1P2) and significantly increased root turnover rate compared to the T0P0 treatment, with increases of 62.53%, 42.57%, and 35.55%, respectively. The interaction between warming and increased precipitation significantly affected the root production of the community (p < 0.01), but this interaction was non-additive. Future climate warming will benefit the accumulation of root-derived carbon in desert steppe communities.

1. Introduction

Due to human activities emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution, global and regional climate change has been exacerbated, mainly climate warming and extreme precipitation. It is estimated that the global surface temperature will rise by 1.0–3.7 °C by the end of the 21st century [1]. Global warming is accelerating hydrological cycles, leading to significant changes in precipitation patterns in terrestrial ecosystems, particularly in high-latitude regions [2]. China has been continuously warming with a temperature of 0.39 °C/decade, with significant warming occurring especially in northwestern China, including Inner Mongolia [3]. Annual precipitation in the northwest region of China has significantly increased at a rate of 0.55 mm/year [4]. Temperature and moisture determine most of the processes involved in photosynthetic carbon sequestration, including photosynthesis, carbon distribution in the aboveground and belowground parts, transpiration, and root growth during plant growth [5].
The Inner Mongolia desert steppe is an indispensable part of the temperate steppe of Central Asia [6,7]. Desert steppes belong to the transitional zone between desert and typical steppes. As a result of harsh ecological environments and climate fluctuation, the desert steppe ecosystem is very fragile, which not only has an impact on the production and life of Inner Mongolia but also has a crucial influence on the carbon cycle in China and even the world [8]. Fine roots play an extremely important role in the carbon exchange process that connects the aboveground parts and the soil [9]. The root turnover rate is often defined as the number of times per year that fine root biomass is replaced [10]. The rate of root turnover is closely related to biochemical cycling in terrestrial ecosystems [11]. Plants can produce and store carbohydrates synthesized by photosynthesis through their roots and then transfer carbon from dead roots to the soil through root turnover [12]. The net primary productivity (NPP) of ecosystems includes aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) [13]. The distribution of NPP between aboveground and belowground components is an important process in the carbon cycle and energy flow of ecosystems and is also one of the main components of the global carbon budget [14,15]. Climate change directly or indirectly affects NPP, so understanding NPP dynamics is essential to enhance our understanding of the impact of grassland belowground carbon allocation and carbon storage. Because of this, a great number of climate change experiments have been carried out, such as studies showing how plant root production will increase [16], decrease [17], or remain unchanged [18] due to climate warming. Changes in precipitation also strongly influence changes in root production, with reduced precipitation increasing root production in alpine steppes and increased precipitation increasing root production in typical steppes. Differences between the results of different studies may be due to their different regional environments due to factors such as climatic conditions, vegetation types, and altitude.
Climatic conditions are considered to be the main drivers of root growth and turnover [19], and a meta-analysis of the world’s grasslands found that temperature and precipitation had a stronger impact on root turnover than soil physico-chemical properties [20]. Climate warming increases soil net mineralization rate and reduces soil water availability, which may affect root productivity and turnover [21,22]. Temperature and precipitation are necessary for plant growth and development, but the effects are still unclear. Higher temperatures lead to lower soil water content [23], which exacerbates drought stress, so plants allocate more carbon to root production to obtain an equal amount of water, thus promoting root growth [24]. In the semi-arid temperate steppe of northern China, it was also concluded that warming promoted root production and turnover [25]. Therefore, our first hypothesis is that warming will increase root production and turnover of Stipa breviflora communities in the desert steppe examined in this study. Increased precipitation will increase soil moisture content, so our second hypothesis is that increased precipitation within a certain range will reduce the root production and turnover of Stipa breviflora communities in the desert steppe. Climate change experiments on the temperate steppe in northern China have shown that warming and increased precipitation have a significant interactive effect on root production and mortality [25]. Thus, our third hypothesis is that there is an interaction between warming and increased precipitation on root production and turnover in the desert steppe. The objective of this study is to characterize the root production and turnover of plant communities in the desert steppe and to evaluate the effects of warming and increased precipitation on plant community aboveground characteristics, root production, and root turnover.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The field experiment site is located in Siziwang Banner (41°47′19″ N, 111°53′45″ E, 1456 m elevation). This region has a typical temperate continental monsoon climate, with cold and long winters, hot summers, and a great temperature difference between day and night. The mean annual precipitation is 280 mm, with precipitation mostly occurring from May to September. The mean annual temperature is 7.2 °C. The soil in the region is light castanozems with a lack of phosphorus, as well as less nitrogen, more potassium, and low organic matter content (the total phosphorus content was 0.31 g/kg, the total nitrogen content was 1.27 g/kg, the total potassium content was 44.07 mg/kg, and the soil organic matter content was 19.27 g/kg) [26]. The vegetation type in the region is that of the desert steppe, and the constructive species is Stipa breviflora; dominant species include Cleistogenes songorica and Artemisia frigida, and associated species include Convolvulus ammannii and Kochia prostrata and other plants.

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiment commenced in 2014, and an open-top chamber (OTC) was used to increase temperature. The OTC used was a hexagonal open-top chamber with a side length of 1.5 m and two kinds of height, 1 m and 2.3 m (1 m and 2.3 m can increase temperature by 1–2 °C and 2–4 °C, respectively), with the top design being a fully or partial opening. The OTC was set up with a 3 m diameter, and a 1 m × 1 m quadrat placed in the center [27]. Precipitation increase was achieved by using rainwater interceptors with 25% and 50% of the basal area of the OTC, respectively. After each rainfall, the rainwater collected in the interceptors was poured into the corresponding plots by the workers (Figure 1a). The experiment treatments included three temperature gradients, ambient temperature (T0), temperature increased by 1–2 °C (T1), and temperature increased by 2–4 °C (T2), as well as three precipitation gradients, natural precipitation (P0), precipitation increased by 25% (P1), and precipitation increased by 50% (P2), with a total of nine treatments (i.e., T0P0, T0P1, T0P2, T1P0, T1P1, T1P2, T2P0, T2P1, and T2P2) and four replicates for each treatment, with a total of 36 plots (Figure 1b).
Stipa breviflora was selected as the research object in the quadrat, and a 20 cm deep soil hole was drilled vertically next to it. An organic glass tube with a diameter of 7.5 cm was buried. The tube was marked at 10 cm and 20 cm below the ground with a black line. The exposed part of the tube was painted black and covered with an opaque lid.

2.3. Data Collection and Calculation

Image collection was carried out from May to October 2019 using a root scanner (CI-600, CID Bio-Science Inc., Camas, WA, USA), scanning every 15 days with a resolution of 11.6 pixels per mm. Rooyfly software (Version 2.0.2, Rootfly Development Team, Clemson, SC, USA) was used to process the scanned map for root growth. A total of 360 images were collected during the growth season. In total, 3673 roots were tracked and marked. Dead and living roots were identified by the color of the root, all black and disappearing roots were recorded as dead, and light brown and white roots were recorded as alive.
The calculations of root production, root standing crop, and root turnover mainly follow Bai and Huo et al. [25,28]. Root production was calculated by the sum of the length of all new roots and the extension length of previously existing roots in each sampling period. Annual mean root standing crop were calculated by the average length of live roots at each observing date of a year. Root turnover rate was calculated by annual root length production, dividing it by annual mean root standing crop
Plant community surveys were conducted in August 2019, with one permanent 1 m × 1 m quadrat in each experimental replicate, where the height, cover, density, and frequency of all species within the quadrats were recorded. Since the experimental restrictions did not allow for the destruction of the plants within the quadrats, 5–10 plants of equal size were selected around the quadrats to be mowed with the ground based on the results of the recordings and were brought back to the laboratory to be dried and weighed before calculating the aboveground production. We used Equation (1) to calculate the importance values of plant species in the quadrats [29].
I V = ( H r + C r + D r + F r + B r ) / 5
Hr, Cr, Dr, Fr, and Br are the relative height, cover, density, frequency, and biomass, respectively.
Meteorological data were collected by a meteorological station (Dynamet, Dynamax Inc., CA, USA) in the experiment site.
Soil temperature and humidity were measured in the topsoil (0–10 cm), using a soil temperature and humidity meter (HH2 Moisture Meter, Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, UK), at noon on the same day as root observation, once in each plot.

2.4. Data Analysis

The Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene test were used to test the normality hypothesis and the homoscedasticity hypothesis of the residuals. The differences in soil temperature, soil moisture, ANPP, root production, root standing crop, and root turnover rate among the treatments were tested using both LSD and post hoc Duncan tests for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 0.05. Two-way ANOVA was employed to compare the effects of warming, increased precipitation, and their interaction on the ANPP, root production, and root turnover rate (Duncan, p < 0.05). A structural equation model was executed in AMOS 21.0. First, possible explanatory variables were included in the path analysis by reviewing the relevant literature on plant root production and turnover. Secondly, we used a maximum likelihood estimation technique to obtain path coefficients and then eliminated the insignificant paths until we obtained the final model. Finally, we used a Chi-square test and the root mean square error of approximation to evaluate the fit of the model. All statistical analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Figures were elaborated using Origin 2021, and tables were elaborated using Microsoft Excel 2019.

3. Result

3.1. Seasonal Variations in the Root Length Production and Root Standing Crop of Plant Communities

Root length production was greatest in August during the experimental period (Figure 2). The root length production of the four treatments with T2P0, T2P1, T2P2, and T1P2 showed a trend of decreasing first in July and then increasing with a peak in production in August.
The peaks of the root standing crop appeared from the 22nd of July to the 8th of August, and the peaks of the T1P0 treatment, the T2P0 treatment, and the T2P2 treatment were in early July; the peak of the T0P2 treatment was in early August. The root standing crop of all the treatments showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing throughout the experimental period, and the three treatments with precipitation increased by 50% (T0P2, T1P2, and T2P2), showing an increasing trend in the second half of August (Figure 3).

3.2. Effects of Different Treatments on ANPP and Root Length Production

Warming, increased precipitation, and their interaction significantly affected ANPP (p < 0.001, Table 1). ANPP in all treatments was 132.34 ± 6.57 g/m2 (Figure 4). The T1P0 and T2P2 treatment significantly increased community ANPP (p < 0.05) in comparison to the T0P0 treatment, with an increase of 49.20% and 79.14%, respectively.
The interaction of warming and increased precipitation significantly affected the root length production of the community in the growing season (p < 0.01, Table 1). In the 0–20 cm soil, the root length production of all the treatments was 45.14 ± 3.11 m/m2 (Figure 4). Under natural temperature conditions, with the increase in precipitation, root length production showed an increasing trend, and root length production of the T0P2 treatment was significantly higher than that of the T0P0 treatment (p < 0.05), with an increase of 98.70%. The root length production of T1P1 was significantly higher than that of the T1P2 treatment and the T0P0 treatment (p < 0.05), with an increment of 116.15% and 111.72%, respectively. Under the condition of warming by 4 °C, with the increase in precipitation, root length production showed a decreasing trend, and the root length production of T2P2 treatment was significantly lower than that in the T2P0 treatment (p < 0.05), with a decrease of 78.45%. The T2P0 treatment and T2P1 treatment significantly increased root length production (p < 0.05) in comparison to the T0P0 treatment, with an increase of 163.03% and 85.14%, respectively.

3.3. Effects of Different Treatments on Root Turnover Rate of Plant Community

Root turnover rate tended to decrease with increasing precipitation under the same warming conditions (Figure 5). Both warming and increased precipitation significantly affected root turnover (p < 0.01, Table 1). In the 0–20 cm soil, the root turnover rate of all the treatments was 1.98 ± 0.11 year−1. Under the condition of warming by 2 °C, the three precipitation treatments (T1P0, T1P1, and T1P2) significantly increased the root turnover rate (p < 0.05) in comparison to the T0P0 treatment, with increases of 62.53%, 42.57%, and 35.55%, respectively. Under natural precipitation conditions, warming resulted in an increasing trend in root turnover, which diminished with increasing temperatures. Root turnover showed a decreasing trend with increasing precipitation under warming conditions, and this decreasing trend was more pronounced at higher temperatures.
Through the structural equation model, it can be seen that the correlation between root turnover and environmental factors (temperature and precipitation) was high (Figure 6). Warming had a significant positive effect on the root turnover rate of the Stipa breviflora community (effect value of 0.332); however, increased precipitation had a significant negative effect on the root turnover of the Stipa breviflora community and important value of Stipa breviflora (effect values of −0.678 and −0.404). The effect of precipitation increase on the root turnover rate of the Stipa breviflora community was greater than that of warming.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on the Root Length Production of the Stipa breviflora Community

The results of this study only partially support our first and second hypotheses. The positive effects of warming on root length production and turnover rate were observed under natural precipitation treatments, which is consistent with other results obtained by warming experiments [19,25]. However, climate warming has an inhibitory effect on these variables under the conditions of increased precipitation. We found a significant interaction between warming and increased precipitation on root production and standing crop, which is partly consistent with the third hypothesis. The structural equation model showed that warming had a negative correlation with root production, and increased precipitation had a positive correlation with root production. The strong interaction between warming and increased precipitation implied that warming and increased precipitation in the desert steppe had a non-additive relationship with root production in the Stipa breviflora community. Because the increased temperatures can accelerate the rate of soil moisture evaporation [23], plants grow in order to absorb more water, which in turn promotes the growth of the primary root to deeper soil [9,24]. In environments with relatively abundant precipitation, the positive impact of climate change may be stronger than the negative impact, thereby promoting root production [30]. However, in arid or semi-arid ecosystems, moisture is the primary limiting factor, which limits the root production in desert steppe ecosystems, and the negative impact of climate warming may be stronger than the positive impact [25]. This study indicated that warming by 1.5–2 °C had a negative effect on root production and standing crop in alpine meadows [18], and similar conclusions were also drawn in typical temperate steppes [25]. In addition, temperature and precipitation had a significant interaction and effect on root production, but precipitation had different effects on root production under different temperature conditions. Because different magnitudes of warming have different effects on soil moisture content, different magnitudes of precipitation increase can improve soil moisture limitations [25].
This study found that warming, increased precipitation, or their interactions could promote root production, but the effect on the root standing crop was not significant. Because plants constantly adjust their nutrient distribution patterns according to different temperatures and precipitation environments [31], such as increased precipitation in desert steppes, more species will compete for this limited resource. Due to the increase in species, the height, coverage, and density of the community will change [32]. Plants with a better environment need to compete for more resources, such as sunlight, CO2, moisture, and so on. Therefore, in order to better survive, plants will have different aboveground and belowground growth patterns and nutrient distribution patterns at different times. The difference in root production is the performance of plant roots in adapting to different environments, while the lack of difference in standing crop may be due to the long-term adaptation of plants to desert steppes or the fact that the difference has not yet been shown due to the short treatment time. Because this study only observed the roots in 0–20 cm soil, it may also affect the results of root production and standing crop. However, a study of temperate steppes in northern China (including meadow steppes, typical steppes, and desert steppes) showed that most of the root lengths of the fibrous-rooted plant species were within 0–20 cm, and only a few taproot plant species had a root length longer than 20 cm [33], but these did not belong to the dominant species of desert steppes. Therefore, the root observation in 0–20 cm soil in this study conforms to the majority of root growth ranges.
This study found that increasing precipitation by 50% under warming conditions did not affect root production but increased ANPP. Because substantial warming leads to the evaporation of soil moisture, increased precipitation reduces soil moisture dissipation, lowers soil temperatures, increases plant cover, and promotes aboveground plant growth [34]. Small increases in temperature have been shown to increase plant ANPP in American short-grass prairie [35], which is the same as the results of this study. Perhaps it is because slight warming enhances the aboveground productivity of plants by promoting photosynthesis and prolonging their phenology [36]. Significant warming promotes the early re-greening of plants, and the appropriate temperature in the early growing season can promote the accumulation of nutrients in plants [36]. However, when the temperature is high in the late growing season, significant warming increases the severity of soil drought and slows down plant growth.

4.2. Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on the Root Turnover of the Stipa breviflora Community

In this study, the root turnover rate was positively correlated with warming and negatively correlated with precipitation increase, which was consistent with the first and second hypotheses. This study also found that warming by 2 °C promoted root turnover. Warming accelerated nutrient mineralization rate and root respiration rate, resulting in shortened optimal root lifespan [37,38], Decayed roots promote the decomposition of roots by microorganisms and return nutrients from the roots to the soil for plant reabsorption [39,40], thereby accelerating nutrient cycling. One study found that the fine root turnover of steppes increases exponentially with global warming [36], which is similar to some of the results of this study. Studies have shown that shrubs have short-lived roots under drought conditions [41], and studies have shown that desert plants grow fine roots quickly when it rains and fall off when it is dry [42], which may be a strategy for plants to cope with drought stress.

4.3. Prediction of Root Production and Root Turnover in the Desert Steppe in the Future, Based on Historical Climate Change

The changes in the root production and turnover of plant communities in the desert steppe in the future depend on the precipitation variation in the region. From 1960 to 2013, the annual average temperature and rainfall in most regions of northwest China showed an increasing trend [4]. According to this trend, it is predicted that the root productivity of communities in the desert steppe in northwest China will increase, but this is also regulated by precipitation; a small increase in temperature and precipitation (a 2 °C and 25% increase in precipitation in this study) is beneficial to the turnover of community roots, but a greater increase in temperature and precipitation (a 4 °C and 50% increase in precipitation in this study) does not affect the turnover of community roots. The experimental site in this study is located in the central part of Inner Mongolia. Based on the meteorological data of Inner Mongolia from 1961 to 2012, the annual rainfall in the central part of Inner Mongolia has not changed after 1975 (except for several wet years), while the temperature has increased by 0.37 °C/decade, which is significantly higher than the global warming rate (0.14 °C/decade) [43].

5. Conclusions

In the desert steppe of northern China, the main effect of experimental warming on root turnover was positive, and the main effect of increased precipitation on root turnover was negative. This study found that warming and increased precipitation had a significant interaction and effect on root production and standing crop, and the interaction was non-additive. Based on this trend, it is predicted that future climate change will be beneficial to the root production and turnover of desert steppe communities in Inner Mongolia. These results will provide theoretical assistance for predicting the response of temperate desert steppes to global climate change.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy14071521/s1, Figure S1: Effects of different treatments on mean root standing crop in Stipa breviflora community in 0–20 cm soil; Table S1: Precipitation and temperature in the growing season of the experimental site in 2019; Table S2: Effects of different treatments on soil temperature and moisture (August).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G., Q.L. and Z.W.; Methodology, J.G., Q.L. and Z.W.; Experimentation, Q.L. and P.L.; Analysis, Q.L., P.L., C.W. (Chengjie Wang), X.Q. and G.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, J.G. and Q.L.; Writing—review and editing, Z.W., C.W. (Chunjie Wang), G.L., Z.Y. and X.Q.; Fund acquisition, Z.W., J.G. and Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Finanzierung

This study was funded by the Center Leading Local Science and Technology Development Plan (2021ZY0020), the National Science Foundation of China (32160331), the IWHR Research & Development Support Program (MK0145B022021), and the Open Research Fund of Yinshanbeilu Grassland Eco-Hydrology National Observation and Research Station (YSS202109), and the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China (2024MS03005).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Boucher, O.; Randall, D.; Artaxo, P.; Bretherton, C.; Feingold, G.; Forster, P.; Kerminen, V.-M.; Kondo, Y.; Liao, H.; Lohmann, U.; et al. Contribution of Working Group to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Clouds and Aerosols. In The Physical Science Basis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; Volume 2013, pp. 616–617. [Google Scholar]
  2. Buytaert, W.; Cuesta-Camacho, F.; Tobón, C. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on the Environmental Services of Humid Tropical Alpine Regions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. You, Q.L.; Cai, Z.Y.; Wu, F.Y.; Jiang, Z.H.; Pepin, N.; Shen, S.S.P. Temperature Dataset of Cmip6 Models over China: Evaluation, Trend and Uncertainty. Clim. Dyn. 2021, 57, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, P.; Xia, J.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Hong, S. Temporal and Spatial Variations of Precipitation in Northwest China during 1960–2013. Atmos. Res. 2017, 183, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, H.Y.; Lin, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.H.; Shangguan, Z.J.; Feng, X.J.; He, J.S. Simulating Warmer and Drier Climate Increases Root Production but Decreases Root Decomposition in an Alpine Grassland on the Tibetan Plateau. Plant Soil 2021, 458, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, R.Y.; Wang, Z.W.; Han, G.D.; Schellenberg, M.P.; Wu, Q.; Gu, C. Grazing Induced Changes in Plant Diversity Is a Critical Factor Controlling Grassland Productivity in the Desert Steppe, Northern China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tariq, A.; Graciano, C.; Sardans, J.; Ullah, A.; Zeng, F.J.; Ullah, I.; Ahmed, Z.; Ali, S.; Al-Bakre, D.A.; Zhang, Z.H.; et al. Decade-Long Unsustainable Vegetation Management Practices Increase Macronutrient Losses from the Plant-Soil System in the Taklamakan Desert. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 145, 109653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.N.; Wang, Z.Y.; Liu, P.B.; Wang, C.J. Mixed Cattle and Sheep Grazing Reduces the Root Lifespan of the Community in a Desert Steppe. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 143, 109422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, C.T.; Zhao, X.Q.; Zi, H.B.; Hu, L.; Ade, L.; Wang, G.X.; Lerdau, M. The Effect of Simulated Warming on Root Dynamics and Soil Microbial Community in an Alpine Meadow of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 116, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lukac, M. Fine Root Turnover. In Measuring Roots: An Updated Approach; Mancuso, S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 363–373. [Google Scholar]
  11. McCormack, M.L.; Guo, D.L. Impacts of Environmental Factors on Fine Root Lifespan. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McCormack, M.L.; Adams, T.S.; Smithwick, E.A.H.; Eissenstat, D.M. Variability in Root Production, Phenology, and Turnover Rate among 12 Temperate Tree Species. Ecology 2014, 95, 2224–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, Y.Z.; Chen, Q.; Lin, S.; Giese, M.; Brueck, H. Resource Manipulation Effects on Net Primary Production, Biomass Allocation and Rain-Use Efficiency of Two Semiarid Grassland Sites in Inner Mongolia, China. Oecologia 2011, 165, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Niu, B.; Zeng, C.X.; Zhang, X.; He, Y.T.; Shi, P.L.; Tian, Y.; Feng, Y.F.; Li, M.; Wang, Z.P.; Wang, X.T.; et al. High Below-Ground Productivity Allocation of Alpine Grasslands on the Northern Tibet. Plants 2019, 8, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diabate, B.; Wang, X.Y.; Gao, Y.Z.; Yu, P.J.; Wu, Z.F.; Zhou, D.W.; Yang, H.J. Tillage and Haymaking Practices Speed up Belowground Net Productivity Restoration in the Degraded Songnen Grassland. Soil Tillage Res. 2018, 175, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, Y.; Klein, J.A.; Winkler, D.E.; Peng, A.H.; Lazarus, B.E.; Germino, M.J.; Suding, K.N.; Smith, J.G.; Kueppers, L.M. Warming of Alpine Tundra Enhances Belowground Production and Shifts Community towards Resource Acquisition Traits. Ecosphere 2020, 11, e03270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, C.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Liu, Z.C.; Zhang, J.J.; Liu, K.; Shi, X.R.; Lock, T.R.; Kallenbach, R.L. Aridity Stimulates Responses of Root Production and Turnover to Warming but Suppresses the Responses to Nitrogen Addition in Temperate Grasslands of Northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 142018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wu, Y.B.; Zhu, B.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Wang, S.P.; Tang, Y.H.; Cui, X.Y. Warming and Grazing Interact to Affect Root Dynamics in an Alpine Meadow. Plant Soil 2021, 459, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, Z.Y.; Chen, H.Y.H. Fine Root Biomass, Production, Turnover Rates, and Nutrient Contents in Boreal Forest Ecosystems in Relation to Species, Climate, Fertility, and Stand Age: Literature Review and Meta-Analyses. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2010, 29, 204–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.S.; Sun, J.; Yu, Z.; Li, Y.; Tian, D.S.; Wang, B.X.; Li, Z.L.; Niu, S.L. Vegetation Type Controls Root Turnover in Global Grasslands. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2019, 28, 442–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, H.J.; Li, Y.F.; Xiao, J.; Xu, Z.F.; Cheng, X.Y.; Liu, Q. Enhanced Root Exudation Stimulates Soil Nitrogen Transformations in a Subalpine Coniferous Forest under Experimental Warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 2158–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hertel, D.; Strecker, T.; Müller-Haubold, H.; Leuschner, C. Fine Root Biomass and Dynamics in Beech Forests across a Precipitation Gradient—Is Optimal Resource Partitioning Theory Applicable to Water-Limited Mature Trees? J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 1183–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gimbel, K.F.; Felsmann, K.; Baudis, M.; Puhlmann, H.; Gessler, A.; Bruelheide, H.; Kayler, Z.; Ellerbrock, R.H.; Ulrich, A.; Welk, E.; et al. Drought in Forest Understory Ecosystems—A Novel Rainfall Reduction Experiment. Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 961–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Joslin, J.D.; Wolfe, M.H.; Hanson, P.J. Effects of Altered Water Regimes on Forest Root Systems. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bai, W.M.; Wan, S.Q.; Niu, S.L.; Liu, W.X.; Chen, Q.S.; Wang, Q.B.; Zhang, W.H.; Han, X.G.; Li, L.H. Increased Temperature and Precipitation Interact to Affect Root Production, Mortality, and Turnover in a Temperate Steppe: Implications for Ecosystem C Cycling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, G.G.; Sui, X.; Li, Y.; Jia, M.Q.; Wang, Z.W.; Han, G.D.; Wang, L.C. The Response of Soil Nematode Fauna to Climate Drying and Warming in Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 2166–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lv, G.; He, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z. The Stability of Perennial Grasses Mediates the Negative Impacts of Long-Term Warming and Increasing Precipitation on Community Stability in a Desert Steppe. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1235510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huo, C.F.; Gu, J.C.; Yu, L.Z.; Wang, P.; Cheng, W.X. Temporal Dynamics of Fine Root Production, Mortality and Turnover Deviate across Branch Orders in a Larch Stand. Oecologia 2022, 199, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Curtis, J.T.; McIntosh, R.P. An Upland Forest Continuum in the Prairie-Forest Border Region of Wisconsin. Ecology 1951, 32, 476–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reynolds, J.F.; Virginia, R.A.; Kemp, P.R.; de Soyza, A.G.; Tremmel, D.C. Impact of Drought on Desert Shrubs: Effects of Seasonality and Degree of Resource Island Development. Ecol. Monogr. 1999, 69, 69–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Domisch, T.; Finér, L.; Lehto, T. Growth, Carbohydrate and Nutrient Allocation of Scots Pine Seedlings after Exposure to Simulated Low Soil Temperature in Spring. Plant Soil 2002, 246, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, Y.; Li, X.Y.; Guo, A.X.; Yue, P.; Guo, X.X.; Lv, P.; Zhao, S.L.; Zuo, X.A. Species Diversity Is a Strong Predictor of Ecosystem Multifunctionality under Altered Precipitation in Desert Steppes. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 137, 108762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, L.B.; Liu, H.Y.; Peng, Z.Y.; Dai, J.Y.; Zhao, F.J.; Chen, Z.T. Root System Plays an Important Role in Responses of Plant to Drought in the Steppe of China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 3498–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, G.Y.; Han, H.Y.; Du, Y.; Hui, D.F.; Xia, J.Y.; Niu, S.L.; Li, X.N.; Wan, S.Q. Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on Net Ecosystem Productivity: A Long-Term Manipulative Experiment in a Semiarid Grassland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 232, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Morgan, J.A.; LeCain, D.R.; Mosier, A.R.; Milchunas, D.G. Elevated CO2 Enhances Water Relations and Productivity and Affects Gas Exchange in C3 and C4 Grasses of the Colorado Shortgrass Steppe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2001, 7, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dorji, T.; Totland, O.; Moe, S.R.; Hopping, K.A.; Pan, J.B.; Klein, J.A. Plant Functional Traits Mediate Reproductive Phenology and Success in Response to Experimental Warming and Snow Addition in Tibet. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gill, R.A.; Jackson, R.B. Global Patterns of Root Turnover for Terrestrial Ecosystems. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Burton, A.J.; Pregitzer, K.S.; Hendrick, R.L. Relationships between Fine Root Dynamics and Nitrogen Availability in Michigan Northern Hardwood Forests. Oecologia 2000, 125, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bartsch, N. Responses of Root Systems of Young Pinus-Sylvestris and Picea-Abies Plants to Water Deficits and Soil Acidity. Can. J. For. Res. 1987, 17, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Eissenstat, D.M.; Wells, C.E.; Yanai, R.D.; Whitbeck, J.L. Building Roots in a Changing Environment: Implications for Root Longevity. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stewart, A.M.; Frank, D.A. Short Sampling Intervals Reveal Very Rapid Root Turnover in a Temperate Grassland. Oecologia 2008, 157, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jackson, R.B.; Caldwell, M.M. The Timing and Degree of Root Proliferation in Fertile-Soil Microsites for 3 Cold-Desert Perennials. Oecologia 1989, 81, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, Q.; Pan, F.F.; Pan, X.B.; Zhang, D.; Li, Q.Y.; Pan, Z.H.; Wei, Y.R. Spatial Analysis of Climate Change in Inner Mongolia during 1961–2012, China. Appl. Geogr. 2015, 60, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of OTC warming device and precipitation collection device (a). Schematic diagram of the plot. T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50% (b).
Figure 1. Diagram of OTC warming device and precipitation collection device (a). Schematic diagram of the plot. T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50% (b).
Agronomy 14 01521 g001
Figure 2. Seasonal variation in root production of plant community with different treatments in 0–20 cm soil. T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Figure 2. Seasonal variation in root production of plant community with different treatments in 0–20 cm soil. T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Agronomy 14 01521 g002
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in root standing crop with different treatments in 0–20 cm soil. T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in root standing crop with different treatments in 0–20 cm soil. T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Agronomy 14 01521 g003
Figure 4. Effects of different treatments on ANPP and root production in Stipa breviflora community in 0–20 cm soil. ANPP: aboveground net primary production. Same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Figure 4. Effects of different treatments on ANPP and root production in Stipa breviflora community in 0–20 cm soil. ANPP: aboveground net primary production. Same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Agronomy 14 01521 g004
Figure 5. Effects of different treatments on root turnover in Stipa breviflora community in 0–20 cm soil. Same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Figure 5. Effects of different treatments on root turnover in Stipa breviflora community in 0–20 cm soil. Same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). T0, T1, T2, P0, P1, and P2 are ambient temperature, temperature increased by 1–2 °C, temperature increased by 2–4 °C, natural precipitation, precipitation increased by 25%, and precipitation increased by 50%.
Agronomy 14 01521 g005
Figure 6. Structural equation model of warming and increased precipitation with Stipa breviflora and aboveground and belowground characteristics of community. The red and blue lines indicate significant positive and negative impacts, respectively. Numbers are standardized path coefficients. Goodness-of-fit index: χ2 is Chi-square, df is degrees of freedom, and RMSEA is the root mean square error of approximation. *, **, and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 6. Structural equation model of warming and increased precipitation with Stipa breviflora and aboveground and belowground characteristics of community. The red and blue lines indicate significant positive and negative impacts, respectively. Numbers are standardized path coefficients. Goodness-of-fit index: χ2 is Chi-square, df is degrees of freedom, and RMSEA is the root mean square error of approximation. *, **, and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Agronomy 14 01521 g006
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA of ANPP, root production, and root turnover of warming and increased precipitation.
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA of ANPP, root production, and root turnover of warming and increased precipitation.
FactordfANPPRoot ProductionRoot Turnover
FpFpFp
Warming27.909<0.0012.7920.08828.588<0.001
Increased precipitation28.64<0.0012.3630.1237.583<0.01
Warming × Increased precipitation46.161<0.0016.755<0.011.6860.197
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Guo, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Liu, P.; Lv, G.; Yang, Z.; Wang, C.; Qiu, X. Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on Root Production and Turnover of Stipa breviflora Community in Desert Steppe. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071521

AMA Style

Li Q, Guo J, Wang Z, Wang C, Liu P, Lv G, Yang Z, Wang C, Qiu X. Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on Root Production and Turnover of Stipa breviflora Community in Desert Steppe. Agronomy. 2024; 14(7):1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qi, Jianying Guo, Zhanyi Wang, Chengjie Wang, Pengbo Liu, Guangyi Lv, Zhenqi Yang, Chunjie Wang, and Xiao Qiu. 2024. "Effects of Warming and Increased Precipitation on Root Production and Turnover of Stipa breviflora Community in Desert Steppe" Agronomy 14, no. 7: 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071521

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop