This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Latest comment: 6 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The source used for the popular vote figures is OurCampaigns which list 3,479 for Federalist electors and 1,097 for Anti-Federalist electors. It's source for this is the Pennsylvania Manual 1927, p. 429 which does not agree with OurCampaings. The source says there were two tickets, a "Henry Ticket", which won, and a "Todd Ticket", which lost. Both tickets are described as Federalist, not Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Therefore, only the best-performing elector from both tickets should be counted as they are both Federalist.
However, it's best to go with A New Nation Votes, a source I find to be reliable. According to this source, the top two performing electors were supported by both parties, which would mean showing a tie in the popular vote since one of them had to have been the Clinton elector. Wowzers122 (talk) 06:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
