Talk:Brotherhood of St Laurence
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Evolution and evolvability
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This seems (still), to be a blatant advertorial for the BSL; an organisation that has been surrounded by controversy over the last twenty years, particularly about its real-estate ethics in Melbourne. Can I get a hand in fixing the article to get a more balanced view. (I'm not a fan of the BSL, so I want someone impartial to run their eye over it). 203.219.193.12 (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's definitely true that the page is written as advertorial content. I've at least slapped a
{{Third-party}}
tag up at the top as a start. Though I hate tagging and leaving, I may have to leave it at that for now since I've not found any good summary references describing the controversies in an initial search. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 03:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)