Talk:Doubt: A Parable
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Doubt: A Parable. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Doubt: A Parable at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The 'long nails' conversations in the play.
editDoes anyone think that the long nails conversations play any part in the relationship the priest had with the boy?
Here is the quote from the actual script;
will you ever cut your nails?
I think that was it i don't have the script here but i saw it yesterday, sorry.
It is only a question and i hope this is not delted for any bad things i may have said or done in this discussion.
Thanks --Mickyfitz13 12:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe the nails have anything directly to do with the priest's alleged actions. It's another stylistic difference between Father Flynn (new church) versus Sister Aloysius (old church) –– not unlike his use of the ballpoint pen.
- Aloysius makes two references to his nails. When she first notices them, she says something very simple like "Your nails..." And then her exit line after their big battle is "And cut your nails!" Having seen (and read) the play several times, I don't believe anyone asks if he will ever cut them. --Swango 21:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Pedophilia/Sexual Abuse
editThis article doesn't address any pedophilic or sexually abusive elements in the play. It would make sense to address this or remove such a classification. Wes! Tc 03:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I vote for removing the classification. The play isn't really about pedophilia or abuse. Swango 05:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
edit- Sorry about my question it just that the play itself messes with your head on whether she done the right thing, the pedophilia wasn't what i was really talking about it is just you don't know whether she done the right thing or not.
- sorry.
Question
editI haven't seen the play but it seems obvious in these cases that the boy would be questioned and if he denied any sexual relationship the matter would end there. John celona 13:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
I HAVE seen the play, and certainly the issue being raised is whether Father Flynn has been sexually abusing the boy. It might also be pointed out in the article that post-play audience discussions have revealed widely differing perceptions of the characters, their attitudes, and the situation.68.72.94.110 (talk) 22:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Doubt.jpg
editImage:Doubt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Is this play about sexual abuse?
editUpon reading this article, I can't tell if the play is about sexual abuse or not. (It seems as though the film is, but it wouldn't be the first time that Hollywood sexed something up.) "Interfering" could mean anything from rape to favoritism. Would someone who has seen or read the play please use some clearer language toward just what Sister Aloysius's suspects? Darkfrog24 (talk) 16:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Racism
editAm I the only person who sees the possibility of racism as opposed to sexual abuse? Mind you I have not seen the play, but that would be a sensible theme because of the apparent "New Chuch" vs "old church" theme
Colon in the title?
editIs there a reliable source for the colon in the title? The publisher/licensor, Dramatists Play Service, lists it here with a comma «Doubt, A Parable». —teb728 t c 09:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Male names for sisters: Intentional?
editI'm not a native English speaker. Is it normal in English that a nun would be called "Sister Aloysi*us*" and not "Sister Aloysi*a*" as in Germany? Also, is not "James" a male name too? Was this use of male names part of the author's intention, or is it really normal names for American nuns? -- 78.50.189.233 (talk) 00:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- For future reference, I'm pretty sure "Sister James" was used in order to have the same name as James, a schoolboy in the play which Sister James teaches. They are mirrors of eachothers' characters in that they both lose their innocence. Habstinat (talk) 01:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, nuns generally take on the name of a saint, either male or female or a combination like "Sister Mary John", depending on the congregation's traditions. —98.113.83.5 (talk) 06:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doubt: A Parable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080829120952/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/92095.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/92095.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081219005611/http://www.newsflash.org:80/2004/02/sb/sb004074.htm to http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/sb/sb004074.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true oder failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doubt: A Parable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/sb/sb004074.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427222114/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/107473.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/107473.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
This article could use a “themes” section
editI’m no editor nor do I have any sources but I just saw the play in a rural theater and then came to read this great wiki article. The doubt in the play could also be a metaphor to faith itself. The nagging uncertainty that follows faith. Seems like there are sorts of themes to be discussed. Assuming sources have written on the subject 2603:8081:8700:3E9C:98DE:9AC6:D826:424E (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)