This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Persondata
editFor some reason the addition of the stub tag has rendered the Persondata field visible. Since I feel drawing attention to the need to expand the article is more important than invisible information that to my knowledge isn't even being used for anything anymore, I have deleted it. If the stub situation is resolved, the Persondata field can always be retrieved from the history. 23skidoo 15:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Voyager
editJust for the record the information about her auditioning for Janeway comes from her convention presentations, so is legitimate information and not in violation of WP:BLP (in terms of libel). I believe it is also mentioned in Starlog magazine, if someone has access to an archive of those publications. Unfortunately Wikipedia's outdated bias against blogs disqualifies the many references to this found by Googling. 23skidoo (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- WP:BLP does not just deal with libel. It deals with any uncited facts about a subject made in a biographical article. It doesn't matter whether the claims are true, false, or even controversial. Xihr 03:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually I disagree - BLP was conceived as Wikipedia's version of libel law. 23skidoo (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Obviously that is its genesis, since before it Wikipedia presented all sorts of legal liabilities with the uncited nonsense that was present in biographical articles. But that doesn't change the fact that the main thrust of WP:BLP as of today is that any claims in it, even uncontroversial ones, must be removed without discussion (emphasis in original):
- "We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high quality references. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space."[1]
- Obviously that is its genesis, since before it Wikipedia presented all sorts of legal liabilities with the uncited nonsense that was present in biographical articles. But that doesn't change the fact that the main thrust of WP:BLP as of today is that any claims in it, even uncontroversial ones, must be removed without discussion (emphasis in original):
nudist?
editis it true she was nudist growing up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.169.161.1 (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Apperance on the Guild
editIn season 5 of the guild, she appeared as Madeline Twain, Vork's love interest. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001292/
Oweng4000 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC).
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Erin Gray. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://geocities.com/buckrogers_nz/erin_gray.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true oder failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Erin Gray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130104102332/http://pressrepublican.com/0100_news/x546314660/Buck-Rogers-returns to http://pressrepublican.com/0100_news/x546314660/Buck-Rogers-returns
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130104102332/http://pressrepublican.com/0100_news/x546314660/Buck-Rogers-returns to http://pressrepublican.com/0100_news/x546314660/Buck-Rogers-returns
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Suggested edit
editSewn in? Given that in 1979 spandex had been around for a couple of decades, the 5th paragraph after the lede, "In response, Gray commented that she was aware of the sexiness of her uniform which was so tight that she had to be sewn into it" appears to be fandom. Spandex is an elastic fabric so this is unnecessary or more to the point, highly unlikely. As the statement also appears to be unsourced, perhaps it should be removed (or at least reworded?). Wokepedian (talk) 04:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- It is not in the lead, but in the career section. ---Lilach5 (לילך5) discuss 04:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- This is also mentioned in Hallmark channel. Sewing in actors into uniforms happened to other actors: Olivia Newton-John sewn into outfit, Olivia Newton-John was sewn into her famous tight black trousers in 'Grease' and had to be unstitched every time she needed the bathroom.. ---Lilach5 (לילך5) discuss 04:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)