Talk:Lewis and Clark-class dry cargo ship

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

"other ships" tag not appropriate in a ship-class article

edit

This article includes the "other ships" tag, "For other ships of the same name, see USS Lewis and Clark." That tag is certainly appropriate for the article about the lead ship of this class, and that article indeed has it. But it doesn't seem to belong in this article, about the class.

My expectation is that people who confuse the USNS Lewis and Clark with, say, the similarly-named ballistic missile submarine might find the "other ships" tag helpful, but anybody who doesn't know the difference between a particular submarine and a class of surface ships needs more explaining than a tag can provide.

For this reason, I'm going to take the tag out. I trust that I can rely on my fellow editors to revert my change if they think it's a mistake.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lewis and Clark-class dry cargo ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply