Talk:List of serving senior officers of the British Army

Latest comment: 11 days ago by 27.125.133.224 in topic You lot are totally wrong

Brigadiers

edit

Are they considered as "Generals" ? BlueD954 (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I see the title is change. Good. BlueD954 (talk) 04:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

More commanders

edit

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/920219/20200922-How_Defence_Works_V6.0_Sep_2020.pdf

Chaplain General

Director Army Legal Services

Should they be added?

Also missing are Legal Services and Medical officers. Will try to find. BlueD954 (talk) 04:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Chaplain General

edit

Should Clinton Langston be included? BlueD954 (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I would say no, because Chaplains do not carry standard officer ranks, as shown in Royal Army Chaplains' Department#Ranks SmartyPants22 (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Antwort
Ok. BlueD954 (talk) 04:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Updates and comments

edit

I have added promotion dates to Generals and Commodores where necessary. Gaia_Octavia_Agrippa Dormskirk could you kindly check if there are any mistakes. Also, should to retire or retired officers be listed? Thanks. BlueD954 (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Looks good to me. I would not add retired officers - it would be a very long list. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 09:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Antwort
Removed. BlueD954 (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, retired officers shouldn't be, but those are 'to retire' should be kept until they have done so.SmartyPants22 (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Colin Mackie aka gulabin.com

edit

While Mackie is often used on Wikipedia as a source for British military officers, he does not include those from legal, medical, Staff and Personnel Support, Educational and Training Services or Provost branches and even some females. This applies not only to this list but to the other related lists. BlueD954 (talk) 11:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up, but he's still a good base line to build off of. Best wishes – SmartyPants22 (talk) 13:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Recently retired officers

edit

Should we have a slowly changing listing of officers who have retired in the last 18 months? For ease of continuity? Pickersgill-Cunliffe 27.125.133.224? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 06:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

see

edit

https://www.linkedin.com/in/adrian~reilly/

27.125.133.224 (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

You lot are totally wrong

edit

https://www.linkedin.com/in/neil-g-519376201/ is

This is Neil Grant's actual appointment. 27.125.133.224 (talk) 01:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply