Talk:Mid Valley Megamall
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Mid Valley Southkey was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 8 September 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Mid Valley Megamall. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Are we gonna merge it with The Garden Mid Valley or not??? Zack2007 13:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I hope not, because both are different things, although it is an extension, when it is finally built it will become a different building altogether, therefore I suggest the articles stay seperated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanimaki (talk • contribs) 21:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
I think i'll remove the tag now because they are different things. Acs4b 14:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Accurate term for the complex
editSignage in the area suggests that the entire complex is called Mid Valley City. Mid Valley Megamall is simply the original mall itself. A rename and section split is in order. Merging The Garden Mid Valley is also a good idea. - Two hundred percent 06:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Should Southkek's formatting be changed?
editJust my opinion: The Mid Valley SouthKey section seems rather like an advertisement for the mall rather than an encyclopedic account. For example, there are too many shops/brands listed, people can just go to their website if they are interested. In comparison, MidValley Megamall has a reasonable amount and a list that has been selected to only identify important outlets. Therefore, I am proposing that the list under Mid Valley Southkey be culled to only reference important anchor tenants.