Talk:Mutaib bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi-logo.jpg

edit
 

Image:Saudi-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arabian Gulf

edit

This term was converted to the Persian Gulf. However, since the term "Arabian Gulf" was stated by King Abdulaziz in this context, I think it should remain as the Arabian Gulf, whatever the dominant use of the term. So I have reverted it to the Arabian Gulf. Thanks, Egeymi (talk) 09:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Once more, do you think that King Abdulaziz referred there as "Persian Gulf"? I do not think so, please do not REVERT his expression, not mine. Please be respectful and open to different ideas. Thanks, Egeymi (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Mutaib bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Mutaib bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 27 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mutaib bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mutaib bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply