Talk:Nepal Communist Party

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 3 March 2021

June 2018

edit

The name of the party is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.244.80.50 (talk) 13:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2020

edit

change 29.91% to 72.72% (math error) C.R 14:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done for now: 32 / 107 is indeed 29.91% DannyS712 (talk) 22:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mapping the 2020-2021 split?

edit

Is there any good WP:RS mapping the ongoing split?

--Soman (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 3 March 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, the proposed style may be the official name, but is highly dispreferred according to Wikipedia policy. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 18:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply



Nepal Communist PartyNepal Communist Party (NCP) – The party is registered as "Nepal Communist Party (NCP)" with NCP within brackets—at the Election Commission in May 2018 after the poll body said it could not allot Nepal Communist Party as it was already registered in the name of Kattel Source ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Supreme Court decision March 2021

edit

So on March 7, 2021 the Supreme Court issued a ruling nullifying the recognition of the 2018 merger of CPN(UML) and CPN(Maoist Centre). That does not mean that the party has ceased to exist. Notably there still seems to exist parts of NCP that haven't aligned with either of the two main factions. And in particular, it does not mean that the previous two parties have automatically resurged. Presumably it's possible that 1-2 of the NCP factions would try to get the registry (...and election symbol) of one of 2 pre-merger parties. But effectively whatever emerges wouldn't be the same 2 parties as pre-merger. --Soman (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

This article outlines some of the dilemmas at hand: https://kathmandupost.com/politics/2021/03/08/the-ncp-party-s-over --Soman (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The Prachanda-Nepal group Central Committee had a meeting today (...i.e. still existing even after SC decision) https://english.khabarhub.com/2021/08/168495/ and as of March 8 Prachanda issued a statement as NCP chairman https://www.facebook.com/prachanda.nepal/posts/2898163770421132 --Soman (talk) 22:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
We could also treat the Prachanda-Nepal Group and the Oli Group as two distinct parties, from the moment the formalized separate Central Committees. But let's wait a few days to see how things crystalize first. --Soman (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit 9 March

edit

I did a review of the article, both in relation to the recent Supreme Court-related edits but also some more general clean-up.

  • Ideology in infobox: Just Marxism-Leninism is fine. People's Democracy is not the same as PMD, and the latter should not be piped from PD. PD isn't an ideology per se, but a party line. Democratic centralism isn't an ideology in itself either.
  • As noted above, the loss of registration does not mean the party is a non-entity and it does not automatically reconstitute the UML and Maobadi Kendra parties (notably, there are already other parties who have registered the names CPN(UML) and CPN(Maoist Centre) after the 2018 merger...)
  • Democratic socialism should definitely not be linked here
  • How could it be that the Politburo would be formed after the Standing Committee? Notably changing 'will' to 'was' doesn't work, since the reference talks about a future formation of the PB. The PB passage needs further rewrite and referencing
  • " 151-member committee for each of the seven provinces" needs to changed as well... the source doesn't back this up.

--Soman (talk) 19:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

https://himalsanchar.com/94462/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=madhavs-nepal-returning-to-oli-controlled-uml so this article implies that the two pre-merger parties are in the process of getting re-constituted. So if M.K. Nepal returns to UML, will Ram Bahadur Thapa return to Maoist Centre? --Soman (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
CPN(UML) signboard at NCP party hq https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/cpn-uml-s-signboard-placed-at-party-headquarters-in-dhumbarahi/ --Soman (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply