Talk:Royall Tyler (academic)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhy in the world is there information about a Richard Davis on Royall Tyler's encyclopedia entry? Fish in the Water 13:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- I asked about this in the Village Pump technical discussion page, and the response I got was that it must have been a cache error. --Kyoko 17:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Why is Tyler's translation better? best?
editIf The Tale of Genji, like The Lord of the Rings, is not about a narrative arc or the growth of the characters, but about a long series of episodes in which the essential nature of the characters is demonstrated again and again (and again),[1] then it could be argued that Tyler's careful fidelity to the Murasaki text allows that serial demonstration to be made in the writer's own terms. An interesting analytical concept I post here for comment ... or alternately, as a reminder to return to this notion when the article about Tyler has been more fully developed. --Tenmei (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
A section on which translation is better would inevitably be POV, and I'm glad to see that nobody has tried to add such a section. (On the other hand, if you want to know what Tyler's translation of Geni is really like, see the one-star review by "Christopher" at Amazon.com, headed: "Avoid this Translation Like the Plague .") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.216.193 (talk) 09:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
References
- ^ Ebert, Roger. Review: "Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Rings," 2001.