172.58.185.174

October 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Linda Perry— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Linda Perry. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

WP:NPOV at Talk:Sara Gilbert

Though I understand your personal viewpoints here, here and here, unless you're ready to assert that men with immotile sperm don't get to call adopted, or sperm-donated, or surrogate children "theirs", which kinda has been the standard for the last, oh, at least 40 years or so since in vitro was started, you're basically making a toothless political argument. If two people, regardless of gender or marriage or whatever, procure a child through legal channels into their household, be it married or casual, that child is typically "theirs". Disagree? Your options at this point are to open a discussion at Talk:Sara Gilbert to seek consensus for inclusion per WP:BRD, since you've already been reverted twice. If you resubmit the content without first achieving consensus through discussion, you run the risk of your IP range being blocked or the article being protected, etc. This isn't a punitive measure, it's just meant to protect the current version of the article from disruptive changes that have not been properly argued by the community. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced oder poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Linda Perry. Jim1138 (talk) 18:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] As noted re: the disputed language about whether or not a child belonging to a married couple can be described as "theirs", your recourse is to open a discussion on each of those talk pages. A discussion has already been opened at Talk:Sara_Gilbert#Parentage. Continuously resubmitting your preferred version without consensus to do so is disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

BTW: "Their child" is legal terminology for the couple who reside in California. See talk:Sara Gilbert#Parentage Jim1138 (talk) 05:04, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jim1138 (talk) 01:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

---