User talk:Deor/Archive8
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
country song
Dear Deor! Thank you ever so much! You did it! It was really Bill Anderson and his 'Doble S'. I am delighted. You are THE BEST!!!Vikorleņa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viktorlena (talk • contribs) 09:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:AN
Re your post at AN, the answer is no. I've informed Cmaverickforprez (talk · contribs) that the school article falls under the probation in respect of his editing. Warned him not to re-add the info without consensus and to discuss on school article's talk page. Mjroots (talk) 15:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
hyphens vs. dashes in prov park names
Please do any more of these, I have enough to pick up after people with as it is.....you claim in one move it is justified by the source, but that's not true here is the Ed Bird-Estella Provincial Park homepage and it's clearly a hyphen, as it also is in BCGNIS if you search "Ed Bird-Estella Park" there. Hyphenated geographic names are hyphenated names and though that's recently been specified in ENDASH - because so many people wanted to ignore it in order to force the $%#& dash down everyone else's throats, it's always been about all geographic names as the author of that section has pointed out on WTMOS and elsewhere. Please stop breaking what don't need fixing; others have to pick up for you, and this particular other is getting real tired of this....Skookum1 (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- What's justified by the source is that the name of the park is Ed Bird–Estella Lakes Provincial Park, and your reversion of the move has restored the incorrect name without the word "Lakes". I'm not going to re-move, but you may want to consider restoring the park's actual name as the article title. The replacement of the hyphen with an en dash had nothing to do with "hyphenated geographic names"—since "Ed Bird" and "Estella Lakes" are both two words, our style (WP:ENDASH #5) calls for an en dash rather than a hyphen; it's a fundamentally different situation from something like "Schleswig-Holstein", where a hyphen is fine to join two single words. Deor (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't notice the plural thing, I'll fix that - but you're VERY wrong about hyphenated names; this was already resolved re regional districts, or is about to be (see Talk:Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District. Anything that's proper name that has a hyphenated name is a hyphenated name. And fully-capitalized terms are proper names.Skookum1 (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- And MOSFOLLOW trumps anything in ENDASH, and both primary sources (BC Parks and BCGNIS, plus CGNDB) use the hyphen.Skookum1 (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't notice the plural thing, I'll fix that - but you're VERY wrong about hyphenated names; this was already resolved re regional districts, or is about to be (see Talk:Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District. Anything that's proper name that has a hyphenated name is a hyphenated name. And fully-capitalized terms are proper names.Skookum1 (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Rearranging versus merging
I agree that the original question you asked isn't being answered, so I've started an alternate proposal here to discuss that. Carcharoth (talk) 11:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry_._._.
coordinate elevation parameter
Why do you state that the {{coord}} elevation parameter is unsupported? (I reverted that because I intend to fix whatever is not supporting it. This is preferable to removing useful information from thousands of articles.) —EncMstr (talk) 17:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- The elevation information for the location is entered in the "elevation_m:" and "elevation_ft:" fields of the infobox. I see no evidence at Template:Coord that an "elevation" parameter is supported in that template, which is the basis of the "coordinates_type:" field from which I removed the parameter. The article was listed here under "Unsupported parameter name", and that is what I was trying to correct. What evidence do you have that such a {{coord}} parameter is currently used in "thousands of articles"? Deor (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've added elevation data to hundreds of articles, and encountered them in many more. It used to be documented at {{coord}} and/or WP:GEO and I added an explanation to User:EncMstr/Coord#Attributes (a page I maintain) when I found it. —EncMstr (talk) 08:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
There should be a barnstar for edit summaries...
...since this one deserves recognition. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Every so often, one just seems to write itself. Deor (talk) 23:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hounslow Heath
Thanks for adding co-ords for Hounslow Heath. I'm not really into mapping at all, but the numbers you added are outside the Heath, some distance from the entrance on Staines Road. The nearest point I can find is "hussar, staines road, hounslow", that is the public house on the north side of Staines Road (on the corner of Barrack Road) directly opposite the present (and historic) entrance. Can you tweak the entry, please? PeterWD (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- PS Same goes for Hounslow Heath Aerodrome, see my map on that article.PeterWD (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- The coordinates I used are roughly in the middle of the area labeled "Hounslow Heath" on Ordnance Survey maps. (Click on the coordinates and select "Ordnance Survey Get-a-Map" from the list, then increase the scale one step.) Is this not correct for the current extent of the heath (which seems to include the HH Golf Course)? Deor (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking. At the time, I clicked through to one of the commercial mapping sites, that showed the co-ords to the west of the rivers, but now looks OK in Google maps for centre of the heath, where I visited on 28 March. Sorry for distraction.PeterWD (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- The coordinates I used are roughly in the middle of the area labeled "Hounslow Heath" on Ordnance Survey maps. (Click on the coordinates and select "Ordnance Survey Get-a-Map" from the list, then increase the scale one step.) Is this not correct for the current extent of the heath (which seems to include the HH Golf Course)? Deor (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
[1] Silly of me! ╟─TreasuryTag►high seas─╢ 12:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Have been known to do it myself. Deor (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Request for comment
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Why must I have to explain simple logic to idiotic people is beyond me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.64.177.145 (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
about "LITINUS"
If you don't know the Roman and Byzantium history it is your false. Open a history book or ask a professor in any university of the world. In university of Padova in Italy there are the coat of arms of the family Litinus. You have just to ask the university of Padova. Also it is very important to let to any person in world to add information about the name of Litinus. There are many opinions about the root of the name Litinus. I have not time to give you these information right now, but it will be good for all of us to share our knowleage. I shall add the historical information about the root of the name in the article. Also for people who know the basic history of roman empire I say to them that the king had the coat of arm ( fasces ) with 12 ropes. The coat of arm of Litinus which is the the walls of the university of Padova has an arm with a fasces with 12 ropes. So Litinus must be the name of a king of Roman. That 's why wikipedia can help us. In wikipedia we shall share our knowlenge. According to the profile of the users who want to delete this article and to the history of their profile and their articles in wikipedia, the users who want to delete this article are bad communists. I am saying bad beacause a good communist respect the history and does not try to modify and change it hiding the truth, and stopping the research. In wikipedia we research the history, and we call all the people to give and share the knowlenge . We are not make critism to the sociaty and to political system. Finally if a user like me , or like the writter of an article (litinus) has to present his knowleage according to some rules of the wikipedia (copywrites etc) , then you have to communicate directly with the user and to help him to represent his articles, and you must not delete the whole article because you have different political believes from the content of the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.130.69.33 (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
space between birth and death years
It is standard to formulate birth and death years the following way: (1938 – 2002). The spaces included are standard. Visit any random biographical page and 95% of the time you will see it that way, including all Feautured and Good articles (for example: Edward Elgar).
Besides, the quote from the page you linked is incomplete. "Disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items (the New York – Sydney flight; the New Zealand – South Africa grand final; June 3, 1888 – August 18, 1940, but June–August 1940)."
Specifically: "; June 3, 1888 – August 18, 1940,"
Here you can clearly see that spaces are supposed to go there. Omegastar (talk) 09:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Warning
You're treading on thin ice. Quit wasting everybody's time. AN is totally an inappropriate place to post on situation which as you said do not require admin attention. AN is plagued with time wasters like yourself as it is.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)