Welcome!

Hello Npeters22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Kilo-Lima 18:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Friend2Friend3.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Notable Pitt people

edit

Do you happen to know the year that the men you added to the List of notable University of Pittsburgh people graduated from Pitt or what degrees they earned? It would help a lot. Thanks for adding to the list, by the way.--Chris Griswold 20:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Richard M. Simpson graduated in 1923, degree unknown. Harve Tibbott graduated in 1906 in pharmacy. Robert J. Corbett was in 1929, degree unknown.
Thanks. Bachelors' degrees?--Chris Griswold 00:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, unknown. I'll keep it in mind as I continue to do research and let you know if I come across anything else.Npeters22 12:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. --Chris Griswold 13:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Jesse Leonard Steinfeld received his B.S. in 1945

Project Congress

edit

Based on your recent (great!) contributions to articles regarding Pennsylvania's past members of Congress, you may want to consider joining us at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Congress. —Markles 04:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Francis E. Walter

edit

If you find a page with an incorrect title, then the technique to use is to "Move" the page. "Cut and paste" moves lose the edit history of the previous article. -Will Beback 20:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Charles Clarence Pratt

edit

Is there a typo in this article? First paragraph is about Pratt, but the second starts out talking about someone named Henry W. Palmer. I know you've been doing a lot of congressmen. Some other congressman's name? I happened to stumble on this one, thought I'd let you know. Fan-1967 19:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I use cut and paste to save me some time and achieve consistency, but every so often I miss a required change.Npeters22 19:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Userpage

edit

I came across some of your congressional articles and am glad you are contributing in this area. I note on your userpage that you are trying to get an article done on every Pennsylvania Congressman "from the US Civil War to 1900" but then you list several 20th-century Members. Is "1900" a typo, or did you expand the scope of your work? (Also, Rep. Hoyer's first name is "Steny" with one "n".) Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for noticing. I had been working on the Congressmen from 1900 to WWI most recently, but I completed that project just today. The last one was Samuel A. Davenport added at 17:18, 25 August 2006. I try to work in a managable time period, but also will drift off in random directions if a subject interests me or I get into a "Tetris" mode of editing. Sometimes I just hate seeing that spot of red in a sea of blue. Npeters22 19:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you -- some of my own biographical articles get started for the same reason. Regards, Newyorkbrad 19:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

List of islands by name

edit

Hi Npeters22, I saw your contributions to the list: great work in progress! :) Best regards, Brz7 22:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for noticing. Something hypnotic about those flags. Npeters22 12:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikimeet?

edit

Since you indicated that you live in Pittsburgh, you may be interested in a Wikimeet I'm trying to set up in Pittsburgh. You may join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Pittsburgh if you're intersted. We currently have 4 interested users, and we're trying to get that up to 5 or more. Once we have at least 5 interested people, we can then discuss the time and location. (Note: If for any reason you do not wish to participate, simply ignore this message.) Scobell302 04:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for your efforts at ENMU! Amazing that someone in PA knows about this small school in NM! --198.59.190.201 19:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Once again, thanks for your newest efforts at ENMU. --198.59.190.201 20:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

==United States Congressional Delegations from Pennsylvania==

edit

You seem to be the keeper of this article. That's why I'm coming to you. The reps need more than just color-coding for parties (although the colors are good). Each rep should have a party abbreviation. See United States Congressional Delegations from Massachusetts, for examples. Thanks! —Markles 20:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've found a nice, reliable, online source for getting the names of the people in Congressional delegations: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html , but I'm not sure how best to incoporate it into the many, many articles we have that could use it as a reference. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. JesseW, the juggling janitor 04:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

edit

Thanks for doing a great job by adding new content to wikipedia! Keep up the good work. (P.S. i gave you a barnstar on your main page. If you dont want it there, you can move it) Chris Kreider 18:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for noticing! Npeters22 13:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Early Congresses in United States Congressional Delegations from Pennsylvania

edit

Please see my comments at Talk:United States Congressional Delegations from Pennsylvania#General tickets and the early Congresses.—Markles 15:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

List of United States Representatives from Foo

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Representatives from Minnesota. It is about to get deleted (any day now) and I think that would be a shame. —Markles 21:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Isaac Van Horne

edit

Hi, I seem to be having a bit of trouble adding info to his biog. He was a member of Congress from Bucks Co. before and maybe during the first year or so that it met in DC. Then he went West and became really perhaps as important in Ohio. His biog info has aleady been kind of a fuss, as the Congress Website folks dug in their heals after they made a typo in his place of residence, and wouldn't even accept that they have the correct info in their own Library. IVH was b Solebury Bucks Co PA and lived there until 1805 when he went to Ohio, also I've got quite a bit more info on him, since he wrote an autobiography and was Adjutant General of the Ohio Militia during the War of 1812, was a founding member of the Society of Cincinnati, and President of a number of Businesses in the then State Capital of Ohio (Zanesville) any help here appreciated John5Russell3Finley 00:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nominate

edit

Wikimedia Pennsylvania

edit

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district

edit

Please see my note at Talk:Pennsylvania's 1st congressional district#General ticket. What do you think? (You can answer here or on that talk page. You needn't answer on my talk page).—Markles 21:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Roman Catholic Diocese of Oudtshoorn

edit

I just looked at Roman Catholic Diocese of Oudtshoorn and you mistakenly wrote Senegal for South Africa. I fixed it but wanted to let you know quick in case you're cutting and pasting. Rigadoun (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Suggested merges

edit

Hi Npeters22, two articles you created, Twelve Mile Island and Fourteen Mile Island, Allegheny River, have been proposed for merger into Allegheny Islands State Park. Your comments on the talk page about the proposed mergers are welcomed. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!

edit
 


Hello, Npeters22, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help
contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! --Thw1309 20:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sporting clubs established in 1911

edit

Hi Npeters22. FYI, I have reverted your recategorisation of Indianapolis 500 and Porto-Lisboa from Category:1911 establishments to Category:Sports clubs established in 1911 on the basis that there articles describe sporting events rather than clubs/teams. I'm happy to discuss further if you like. (For example, I would support these articles being moved into a category called "Sporting events established in 1911" but I'm not confident that such categories would contain sufficient articles to make them worthwhile). Regards. DH85868993 23:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good work on Christianity and Dioceses in Africa. This is the kind of thing that takes wikipedia to the next level. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 20:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma

edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rambutan (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that anybody would wish to read about it; I don't think it passes the notability policy - just because it's part of something notable doesn't mean it's notable itself (notability is not inherited).--Rambutan (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I admit it is a stub, but by including it in the encyclopedia, it should encourage others to add more information. I do provide source information. And there is definitely interest in the topic. If you do a search on Google, you will find many links to Catholic and other religious organizations regarding this Diocese. To people interested in missionary work, individual dioceses in Africa are defineitely notable.Npeters22 17:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma

edit

Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Roman Catholic Diocese of Bungoma during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rambutan (talk) 07:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit
  On 24 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Allegheny Arsenal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Aksi_great (talk) 19:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit
100px Hello! I was looking over "New Pages", and have seen you have done a nice job creating articles related to Roman Catholic Diocese. So I made this barnstar just for you! Here you go! - Ohmpandya We need to talk...contribs 17:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply The ‎Roman Catholic Diocese Barnstar
Indeed, thanks for your contributions. Please don't forget about adding the interwiki links! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Roman Catholic dioceses of Europe

edit

Finally Poland has some decent articles!! I'll make a list for you! TYVM. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Benkenobi18 (talk) 06:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just saw what you did with Brazil. Awesome job there! Benkenobi18 (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for fixing up the lists. I hope that makes your job somewhat easier.Benkenobi18 (talk) 02:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yay! Brazil is done.
100px

User talk:Benkenobi18contribs 17:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The ‎Roman Catholic Diocese Barnstar

Territorial Prelature of Cametá

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Territorial Prelature of Cametá, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.gcatholic.com/dioceses/diocese/came1.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Greetings

edit

Thanks for your work on Indonesian dioceses - I have subsequently tagged the items all as stubs - they can always be elevated later - please if you are indeed to do more- could you follow suit on the talk page with the tags? it would be of some help if you could. Thanks SatuSuro 01:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Catholic Dioceses

edit
By my reckoning 43 more articles left. I've finished off Malaysia, Burma, and Pakistan. 10 more in Indonesia and 33 in the Philippines. I'll knock off some more tomorrow as it's late here, but I wanted to let you know how close you are to finishing up the last of 3000 Catholic dioceses. You've been working on this for a year. Do you want to do anything to celebrate? Benkenobi18 (talk) 08:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Roman Catholic Diocese of Daet. She's all yours. As far as I can see the very last diocese that needs to be created! :D

Congrats.Benkenobi18 (talk) 02:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Indonesia

edit

I once saw Lombards map of the dioceses of indonesia and thought i must do something with that some time - and wow you have! Very impressed - if I had a spare golden image of thanks and amazing and wow - you would have got it! Amazing work and thanks SatuSuro 14:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks SatuSuro 12:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Timor-Leste

edit
 

Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Timor-Leste, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Project Congress, again

edit

As a participant of WikiProject U.S. Congress, please consider placing {{Project Congress to do}} to the top of your User_talk page. Thank you. —Markles 16:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pope John Paul II

edit

Hello Npeters22, We are looking for help on the Pope John Paul II article in order to improve it and raise it to ‘Good Article’ and eventually ‘Featured Article’ status. So, I though I would invite you to take a look. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards Marek.69 talk 02:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibility of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art at the Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

edit

You may be interested in this. Hope to see you there! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 05:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Assessments

edit

If you are going to put project banners on talk pages (THANK YOU!), can you please assess them too?—Markles 16:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Senate lists

edit

If you added the lists of senators you assessed to your watchlist, you are going to see a bunch of reassessments. I am not reassessing your work, but changing state project assessments to "list". -Rrius (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wow, that heads up was completely unnecessary. I way overestimated the number I would be changing because all of the ones I spot checked needed to be corrected, but it turned out they were three of only four that needed to be changed. So, um, never mind.


edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Entrance to the National Cemetery of the Alleghenies 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 23:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject U.S. Congress Assessments

edit

I have downgraded two articles which you assessed for WikiProject U.S. Congress, Missouri's 1st congressional district and Missouri's 2nd congressional district back down to Stub-class because the assessments you provided did not meet the WikiProject's quality scale criteria. If you have any questions regarding my re-assessment of the two articles in question, please feel free to ask me on my UserTalk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 13:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tommaso Reggio

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tommaso Reggio, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://saints.sqpn.com/saintt40.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

The two sources I did remove were personal website projects and did not meet the criteria for WP:RS. The source I did leave was the official website for the Apostolic Prefecture of the Falkland Islands. And btw once challenged the onus is actually on you to demonstrate their validity, not for me to justify their removal. Justin talk 17:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please decscribe the exact point of you objection to your sources, since the term personal website does not appear in WP:RS. Are you claiming these sources are not scholarly, not objective, extremist, or some other objection? I don't see where sites admitting to a primary webmaster should be rejected as a source.Npeters22 (talk) 02:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Why do they need to be included? They're personal websites and neither reflect the official website. Justin talk 12:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Isn't that the reason why you would have multiple sources? In this specific case, the other sources provide the statistical information about the prefecture (population, size, etc.) as well as a clearer explanation of the prefecture's lineage than what is provided by the "offical" webasite. Finally, I have used these sources in other situations, so I do want to understand your objection. "Personal" websites (the term is not used in the WP:RS, so I am assuming you mean Self-published sources) are allowed if the person publishing is an extablished expert in the field. I would argue these are both secondary sources compliled by experts in their field.Npeters22 (talk) 14:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
You've hit the nail on the head, they're self-published sources, I'm not convinced of the expertise given they get facts like the name wrong. Justin talk 15:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry? The name is correct in both sources. The name is properly written in Latin, so there can be a little difference in the translated name. What do you think the proper name is?Npeters22 (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
If you are referring to the "o Malvinas" or the "seu Malvinis", this is because the name in Latin is essentially "Apostolic Prefecture of the Faulkland Islands or the Malvines." I assume this is because of the Faulkland Islands War. Vatican translations into English often use "o" as a linkage. I have no idea why. Nonetheless, in practical usage English Speakers call it the "Apostolic Prefecture of the Faulkland Islands". Npeters22 (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer

edit
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Pittsburgh

edit
 

Hello Npeters22, this message is being sent on behalf of WikiProject Pittsburgh. You have previously signed up as a member and we are currently trying to determine any members that have become inactive or no longer care to be a member. If you still wish to be on the member list, please sign your name here. Thank you, on behalf of the project, Grsz11 22:00, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pittsburgh event for Wikipedia's tenth anniversary

edit

Hi! Since you're a member of WikiProject Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 14:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

edit
 

Hello, Npeters22! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Armenian dioceses

edit
 

A tag has been placed on List of Armenian dioceses, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashot Arzumanyan (talkcontribs) 18:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

US National Archives collaboration

edit
 
United States National Archives WikiProject
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh activity

edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh is rolling out some new features (see our discussions at WT:PITTSBURGH). We are also trying to determine how many members are active, and interested in contributing to Pittsburgh content or coming to our real life meetups to discuss Wikipedia in general. If you could go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh/Members and move your name from inactive to the active or semi-active group (depending on your interest in Pittsburgh issue and overall activity) groups, this would be great. Hopefully in a near future you'll also receive our first newsletter with various information on what we have been doing, and what useful tools are available. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop at CMU (Aug 15)

edit

Since you are one of the editors in the Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Carnegie Mellon University, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course (WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey

edit
 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Npeters22! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Roman Catholic Diocese of Jashpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cathedral of Our Lady of the Rosary
Roman Catholic Diocese of Uijeongbu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to S.J.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus: January 2012

edit
 

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Global account

edit

Hi Npeters22! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pittsburgh meetup

edit

Pittsburgh Wikipedians are invited to a meet up on April 3, 2015. Meetup Pittsburgh

  Bfpage |leave a message  20:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Diocese of Moosonee

edit
 

The article Diocese of Moosonee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page. Redirects to the actual disambiguation page, and no pages link to this page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 14:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

This PROD notice was placed in error and has been removed. Sorry for the confusion. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 14:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit

Talk:Martin Russell Thayer

edit

Hi, Npeters22. Since you have created the article and I'm not so sure how to edit, could you please have a look at the TP Talk:Martin Russell Thayer. Thank you very much.--46.114.40.108 (talk) 19:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

(Solved) Hi, Npeters22. Excuse me, sorry to have bothered you here with my beginner's problems. (It was only a minor technicality about how to add a Gutenberg-Link.) --176.4.7.228 (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Diocese of Mysore) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Diocese of Mysore, Npeters22!

Wikipedia editor Samtar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

old disambiguation reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Samtar's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Catholic-Hierarchy.org

edit

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [1]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of ChemAdvisor

edit
 

The article ChemAdvisor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ChemADVISOR logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ChemADVISOR logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Mauritania has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Mauritania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MSJapan (talk) 05:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

edit
  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Npeters22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Npeters22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about James M. Russell

edit

Hello, Npeters22, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Missionedit, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, James M. Russell, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. Russell.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Missionedit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-- Missionedit (talkcontribs) 04:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mud Island Shoal

edit
 

The article Mud Island Shoal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NATFEAT. "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river". The small island seems to be of little significance, with no hope of expanding it to an encyclopedic article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply