Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australasian Federation of Family History Organisations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 12:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Australasian Federation of Family History Organisations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and ORG. Source eval:

Kommentare	Source
Primäre	1. "Australasian Federation of Family History Organisations - Home". www.affho.org. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Primäre	2. ^ "Australasian Federation of Family History Organisations - Home". www.affho.org. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Ad	3. ^ "Advertising". Canberra Times. 1978-03-28. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Member org, not SIGCOV, not IS	4. ^ "Australasian Federation of Family History Organisations Inc". www.tasfhs.org. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Promo for event	5. ^ "AU/NZ Family History Month - Home". familyhistorymonth.org.au. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Primary, travel information for event	Norfolk Island Travel Centre". https://www.norfolkislandtravelcentre.com/. 2020-10-09. Retrieved 2023-05-18. `{{cite web}}`: Empty citation (help): External link in \|website= (help)
Primäre	7. ^ "Australasian Federation of Family History Organisations - Nick Vine-Hall". www.affho.org. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Member org, not SIGCOV, not IS	Genealogical Society of Victoria". www.gsv.org.au. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
Member org, not SIGCOV, not IS	9. ^ "Nick Vine Hall Award - Newcastle Family History Society". 2019-02-25. Retrieved 2023-05-18.

BEFORE showed promo, mentions, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

Earwig copyright report: [1]. // Timothy :: talk 07:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimothyBlue,

I don't know where else to find information. AFFHO is an organisation that covers over 20,000 Australians and Kiwis but doesn't appear in the formats you require.

The Canberra Times articles is NOT an ad, despite the title. Ngerbuns (talk) 07:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Organizations, Australia, and New Zealand. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have removed most of the content for copyright reasons. — Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: erroneous nomination, Canberra times article is not an ad Jack4576 (talk) 07:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's also not in the article any more, having apparently been removed as part of copyvio cleanup. XOR'easter (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There doesn't seem to be much we can say about this organization as an organization. Is there a plausible redirect target? XOR'easter (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear to be notable Very Average Editor (talk) 20:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A pretty lazy delete - with just on some very cursory searching I have found that basically all significant genealogical groups in NZ and Aust belong to this organisation. Sure the article as it ~~stands~~ stood was lousy but with a bit of time and research i have improved it. Will meet the notability requirements. I suggest those who want to delete it reassess their positions.NealeWellington (talk) 08:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- As an umbrella body for local groups, this is likely to be notable. As with many such organisations, there is often difficulty in finding truly independent sources, but that is the nature of such societies. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep per WP:HEY thanks to NealeWellington, and per Peterkingiron. Deus et lex (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.