Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Wilmington Chamber of Commerce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Wilmington, North Carolina#Economy. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Greater Wilmington Chamber of Commerce

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Greater Wilmington Chamber of Commerce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't have the coverage or significance for a standalone article. Possibly worth a merge/redirect or just redirect to Wilmington, North Carolina#Economy, where it is already discussed. Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 16:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Redirect to Wilmington, North Carolina#Economy. Mccapra (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect to Wilmington, North Carolina#Economy per above. Ravenswing 13:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
• Redirect per nom. None of these administrative details are worth merging over. --Lockley (talk) 18:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.