Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodbridge Foam Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Woodbridge Foam Corporation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article on a company of no notability. When deprodded two years ago by Dr kiwano the company was supposed to be on the verge of great notability due to the COVID situation. That notability has not materialised. Cabayi (talk) 10:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Canada. Cabayi (talk) 10:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ontario. Shellwood (talk) 10:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno that I'd go so far as to say it was on the verge of _great_ notability (nor would I have at the time); it had just been mentioned in a few news articles. At this point I wouldn't consider it to be notable enough to warrant its own article (though it may still bear some mention elsewhere -- e.g. in a timeline of trade restrictions on N95 masks early in the COVID pandemic). Dr kiwano (talk) 07:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: consensus around "mentioning elsewhere" and if so, where
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing much found for sources, there was a fire in the factory a while ago, rest are press releases. 11:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.