Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eastrock02

Eastrock02

The Soldiers and Sailors monument atop East Rock in New Haven, Connecticut.

This is a self-nomination for a picture of the Soldiers and Sailors monument on top of East Rock in New Haven, Connecticut, USA. I think the picture is eye-catching and adds substantially to the quality of the East Rock article.

Nominate and support. - StAkAr Karnak 14:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An OK pic but not sufficiently special or interesting for Featured - Adrian Pingstone 19:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry but this won't pass. It is a good picture and a worthy contribution to its article but an extremely high standard has been set on this page for pictures of static objects, cities, monuments and the like. This pic could be improved fairly easily with regards to contrast and accutance but even then it would need to be much larger and stunningly sharp to be a match for our existing similarly themed FPs ~ Veledan • Talk 19:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kommentar How large is a good size for consideration?--StAkAr Karnak 13:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antwort Check out File:Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica Jan 2006.jpg

. Not all the older FPs are of that quality, of course, but I think we have been privileged more recently to have photography to match or better the finest examples found in the world's periodicals, but one consequence is that it makes the competition extremely stiff! ~ Veledan • Talk 20:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Boring. It's just a monument, I'm afraid. Alr 00:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ack all above. --Janke | Talk 10:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition. Bertilvidet 15:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Hasn't got the sparkle. --Thorpe | talk 19:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per all above. --Lewk_of_Serthic _contrib ^talk 21:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, not good enough. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not exceptional. --Philopedia 22:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 19:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]