Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sabuj.bd71
Sabuj.bd71
- Sabuj.bd71 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
18 July 2024
edit– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk oder checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
edit- Jksm123 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Recreated Draft:Silver_Synth which has been the main focus of prior accounts. Ravensfire (talk) 23:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
edit- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
edit- Jksm123 is Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) on the CU data, tagging as suspected RoySmith (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
01 August 2024
edit– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse oder decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
edit- Sa.Editor121 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Purple Imp (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Obvious block evasion. SPA Sa.Editor121 created a day after last sock User:Jksm123. Gamed autoconfirm, then today recreated Silver Synth. Requesting checkuser for further sleepers, since this account was created before the last sock was blocked. Wikishovel (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I've also just noticed some overlap with SPA Purple Imp. Account was created October 2017, but first edits were on 15 and 16 July, deleting unflattering content from Tony Banks (businessman) both sourced and unsourced. When the deletions were reverted, User:Sa.Editor121 stepped in on 16 and 17 July to repeat them. This looks like a sock farm where someone forgot to change their login. CU has been endorsed, so I guess we'll see what turns up. Wikishovel (talk) 07:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
edit- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
editI have blocked and tagged Sa.Editor121 per WP:DUCK. However they are requesting to be unblocked and deny they are a sock. Out of an abundance of caution I endorse the requested checkuser. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)