Talk:Wikileaks release Afghan 'war logs' in co-operation with mainstream media
watching BBC news 24 and Sky news, will try and find in print the opinions of their talking heads.KTo288 (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1066642 [Passed]
[edit] ![]() |
Revision 1066642 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Should be OK now I've given it a quick copy edit. Could really use more detail, but it's not worth holding it up any longer. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1066642 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Should be OK now I've given it a quick copy edit. Could really use more detail, but it's not worth holding it up any longer. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Length
[edit]This is really short: it seems it was abandoned by its original author. Technically it is three paragraphs, but two of those are very short.
It deserves a lot more, if someone can manage it.
--InfantGorilla (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. This is a big story - maybe too big for just a few people to really come to grips with since there are 90000 documents and a lot of pissed of government officials. Turtlestack (talk) 18:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)