Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions (alt): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Updating requested pagemoves list
Updating requested pagemoves list
Line 6: Line 6:


===July 9, 2024===
===July 9, 2024===
* '''[[:Autism spectrum disorders in the media]] → {{no redirect|Autism in popular culture}}''' – (''[[Talk:Autism spectrum disorders in the media#Requested move 9 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – Main topic page [[Autism spectrum disorder]] has been moved to [[Autism]]. The content of the article explicitly discusses [[WP:IPC|popular culture]] rather than the more vague subject of "the media". Options: :1. {{Agree}} in full → {{no redirect|Autism in popular culture}} :2. {{Agree}} in half → {{no redirect|Autism in the media}} or {{no redirect|Autism spectrum disorders in popular culture}} :3. {{Disagree}} → {{no redirect|Autism spectrum disorders in the media}} <br />— [[User:Urropean|Urro]]<sup>[[User_talk:Urropean|<nowiki>[</nowiki>''talk''<nowiki>]</nowiki>]][[Special:Contributions/Urropean|<nowiki>[</nowiki>''edits''<nowiki>]</nowiki>]]</sup> ⋮ 16:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
*
* '''[[:List of people with non-binary gender identities]] → {{no redirect|List of non-binary people}}''' – (''[[Talk:List of people with non-binary gender identities#Requested move 9 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – Per [[Wikipedia:Article titles]], the title should be "no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects." Also, "non-binary people" is the more [[WP:COMMONNAME|common term]] used by both reliable sources[https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22non-binary+people%22][https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22people+with+non-binary+gender+identities%22] and LGBT groups.[https://glaad.org/reference/nonbinary/][https://www.hrc.org/resources/transgender-and-non-binary-faq][https://transequality.org/issues/resources/understanding-nonbinary-people-how-to-be-respectful-and-supportive] [[User:Nosferattus|Nosferattus]] ([[User talk:Nosferattus|talk]]) 16:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
*
* '''[[:Shikike]] → [[Fujiwara Shiki-ke]]''' – (''[[Talk:Shikike#Requested move 9 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – The last name was Fujiwara, with the added epiteth "Shiki-ke". "Shikike" alone was not the family name nor is it transliterated correctly (-''ke'' means "House"). Request move to clear confusion. See also Owari Tokugawa family discussion for similar issue and solution. [[User:Gryffindor|Gryffindor]] ([[User talk:Gryffindor|talk]]) 15:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
* '''[[:Shikike]] → [[Fujiwara Shiki-ke]]''' – (''[[Talk:Shikike#Requested move 9 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – The last name was Fujiwara, with the added epiteth "Shiki-ke". "Shikike" alone was not the family name nor is it transliterated correctly (-''ke'' means "House"). Request move to clear confusion. See also Owari Tokugawa family discussion for similar issue and solution. [[User:Gryffindor|Gryffindor]] ([[User talk:Gryffindor|talk]]) 15:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
*
*
Line 407: Line 411:
* '''[[:Tales of the Jedi (TV series)]] → {{no redirect|Star Wars: Tales}}''' – (''[[Talk:Tales of the Jedi (TV series)#Requested move 2 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – Since this move made nearly three months ago has been objected to, here is an RM. I personally don't agree with the need as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATales_of_the_Jedi_%28TV_series%29&diff=1217570802&oldid=1217446196 consensus was reached on the matter]. Never the less, this anthology series had its first installment released as (formally) ''Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi'' (commonly ''Tales of the Jedi'') in October 2022, with it announced in April 2023 that [https://www.starwars.com/news/swce-2023-tales-of-the-jedi-season-2 it would get a second season] (wording used by media outlets, though the quote from Filoni was "Tales of the Jedi was so fun the first time, I decided to do some more.") Subsequently, it was announced a year later in April 2024 that this second "season" was a new "installment", ''Star Wars: Tales of the Empire'' (commonly ''Tales of the Empire''). [http://www.thefutoncritic.com/video/2024/04/04/video-disneyplus-unveils-trailer-and-key-art-for-star-wars-tales-of-the-empire-617325/20240404disney01/ This press release] shows the use of both formal names as well as the key quote in my view (and the determination of the previous consensus) that ''Tales of the Empire'' was {{tq|the second installment of the "Tales" series}}. Thus, an appropriate name to address this anthology series considering the formal name would be [[Star Wars: Tales]], which provides a [[WP:NATURAL]] name. - [[User:Favre1fan93|Favre1fan93]] ([[User talk:Favre1fan93|talk]]) 17:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
* '''[[:Tales of the Jedi (TV series)]] → {{no redirect|Star Wars: Tales}}''' – (''[[Talk:Tales of the Jedi (TV series)#Requested move 2 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – Since this move made nearly three months ago has been objected to, here is an RM. I personally don't agree with the need as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATales_of_the_Jedi_%28TV_series%29&diff=1217570802&oldid=1217446196 consensus was reached on the matter]. Never the less, this anthology series had its first installment released as (formally) ''Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi'' (commonly ''Tales of the Jedi'') in October 2022, with it announced in April 2023 that [https://www.starwars.com/news/swce-2023-tales-of-the-jedi-season-2 it would get a second season] (wording used by media outlets, though the quote from Filoni was "Tales of the Jedi was so fun the first time, I decided to do some more.") Subsequently, it was announced a year later in April 2024 that this second "season" was a new "installment", ''Star Wars: Tales of the Empire'' (commonly ''Tales of the Empire''). [http://www.thefutoncritic.com/video/2024/04/04/video-disneyplus-unveils-trailer-and-key-art-for-star-wars-tales-of-the-empire-617325/20240404disney01/ This press release] shows the use of both formal names as well as the key quote in my view (and the determination of the previous consensus) that ''Tales of the Empire'' was {{tq|the second installment of the "Tales" series}}. Thus, an appropriate name to address this anthology series considering the formal name would be [[Star Wars: Tales]], which provides a [[WP:NATURAL]] name. - [[User:Favre1fan93|Favre1fan93]] ([[User talk:Favre1fan93|talk]]) 17:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
*
*
===Elapsed listings===
{{hatnote|The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.}}
* '''[[:Dong Huling]] → {{no redirect|Tung Hu Ling}}''' – (''[[Talk:Dong Huling#Requested move 25 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – The editors involved in the move from Tung Hu Ling to Dong Huling one year ago now agree the move should be undone. The subject of this article used the name Tung Hu Ling in his personal life, and based on reliable sources was known to the general public under that name as well, in the United States and around the world. [[Tung Hu Ling]] is a redirect page so an administrator's assistance is requested to complete this return move, and additional comments are invited. This was our discussion: ::...this [move from Tung Hu Ling to Dong Huling] has become controversial because this person lived quite a long time in the United States under the name Tung Hu Ling, and that is the name on his headstone in Honolulu as you can see in [https://billiongraves.com/grave/Hu-Ling-Tung/9055690 this photo]. His son Tung Kai Ying moved to the USA with him; he and his descendants also spell their surname Tung. Would you support undoing the move, and if so do you have a preference as to how we initiate it? [[User:Jōkepedia|Jōkepedia]] ([[User talk:Jōkepedia|talk]]) 04:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC) :::Hmmm... this is quite an interesting case. I actually ran into a similar situation recently with [[Zhang Xueliang]]. The main difference is that in that case, there was a large number of recent sources that could be consulted, whereas few reliable sources seem to mention Dong. I think we should be cautious about deferring to the name someone used in the personal life, since that might not be the name they're known by to the general public. But in this case, given the lack of recent reliable sources, I don't have a strong opinion either way. [[User:SilverStar54|SilverStar54]] ([[User talk:SilverStar54#top|talk]]) 04:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC) ::::Thanks for your thoughts. During his life he was known to the general public as Tung Hu Ling through articles in the reliable sources Black Belt magazine and T'ai Chi magazine from the 1960s through the early 1990s, and taught classes and workshops in Los Angeles, Hawaii, and around the world under that name. As you say, given the lack of more recent reliable sources that is all we have to go on, and as we are the only editors ever to discuss this, it seems non-controversial to revert to that name while noting the Hanyu Pinyin spelling where appropriate. [[User:Jōkepedia|Jōkepedia]] ([[User talk:Jōkepedia|talk]]) 05:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC) :::::I think that's fair, although you should copy this conversation to the article's talk page for others' reference. [[User:SilverStar54|SilverStar54]] ([[User talk:SilverStar54#top|talk]]) 05:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Discussion copied as advised. I volunteer to edit the article and incoming wikilinks after the return move is completed. [[User:Jōkepedia|Jōkepedia]] ([[User talk:Jōkepedia|talk]]) 17:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
* '''[[:Dong Huling]] → {{no redirect|Tung Hu Ling}}''' – (''[[Talk:Dong Huling#Requested move 25 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – The editors involved in the move from Tung Hu Ling to Dong Huling one year ago now agree the move should be undone. The subject of this article used the name Tung Hu Ling in his personal life, and based on reliable sources was known to the general public under that name as well, in the United States and around the world. [[Tung Hu Ling]] is a redirect page so an administrator's assistance is requested to complete this return move, and additional comments are invited. This was our discussion: ::...this [move from Tung Hu Ling to Dong Huling] has become controversial because this person lived quite a long time in the United States under the name Tung Hu Ling, and that is the name on his headstone in Honolulu as you can see in [https://billiongraves.com/grave/Hu-Ling-Tung/9055690 this photo]. His son Tung Kai Ying moved to the USA with him; he and his descendants also spell their surname Tung. Would you support undoing the move, and if so do you have a preference as to how we initiate it? [[User:Jōkepedia|Jōkepedia]] ([[User talk:Jōkepedia|talk]]) 04:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC) :::Hmmm... this is quite an interesting case. I actually ran into a similar situation recently with [[Zhang Xueliang]]. The main difference is that in that case, there was a large number of recent sources that could be consulted, whereas few reliable sources seem to mention Dong. I think we should be cautious about deferring to the name someone used in the personal life, since that might not be the name they're known by to the general public. But in this case, given the lack of recent reliable sources, I don't have a strong opinion either way. [[User:SilverStar54|SilverStar54]] ([[User talk:SilverStar54#top|talk]]) 04:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC) ::::Thanks for your thoughts. During his life he was known to the general public as Tung Hu Ling through articles in the reliable sources Black Belt magazine and T'ai Chi magazine from the 1960s through the early 1990s, and taught classes and workshops in Los Angeles, Hawaii, and around the world under that name. As you say, given the lack of more recent reliable sources that is all we have to go on, and as we are the only editors ever to discuss this, it seems non-controversial to revert to that name while noting the Hanyu Pinyin spelling where appropriate. [[User:Jōkepedia|Jōkepedia]] ([[User talk:Jōkepedia|talk]]) 05:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC) :::::I think that's fair, although you should copy this conversation to the article's talk page for others' reference. [[User:SilverStar54|SilverStar54]] ([[User talk:SilverStar54#top|talk]]) 05:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Discussion copied as advised. I volunteer to edit the article and incoming wikilinks after the return move is completed. [[User:Jōkepedia|Jōkepedia]] ([[User talk:Jōkepedia|talk]]) 17:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
*
*
===Elapsed listings===
{{hatnote|The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.}}
* '''[[Addison Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Addison Senate district]]''' – (''[[Talk:Addison Vermont Senate District#Requested move 25 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – Per [[WP:LOWERCASE]] and [[WP:TITLECON]]. Better conforms to the naming convention used for U.S. congressional districts. For example: * [[Vermont's 1st congressional district]] * [[Vermont's 2nd congressional district]] * [[Vermont's at-large congressional district]] ...as well as other state senate districts, such as * [[Iowa's 40th Senate district]] * [[Michigan's 18th Senate district]] * [[West Virginia's 6th Senate district]] Long term, the consensus reached here could potentially be applied to [[Vermont House of Representatives districts]] and [[Massachusetts General Court]] districts as well (Vermont and Massachusetts are the few states that use county names in their legislative districts, as opposed to strict numerical naming). [[User:Woko Sapien|Woko Sapien]] ([[User talk:Woko Sapien|talk]]) 14:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
* '''[[Addison Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Addison Senate district]]''' – (''[[Talk:Addison Vermont Senate District#Requested move 25 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – Per [[WP:LOWERCASE]] and [[WP:TITLECON]]. Better conforms to the naming convention used for U.S. congressional districts. For example: * [[Vermont's 1st congressional district]] * [[Vermont's 2nd congressional district]] * [[Vermont's at-large congressional district]] ...as well as other state senate districts, such as * [[Iowa's 40th Senate district]] * [[Michigan's 18th Senate district]] * [[West Virginia's 6th Senate district]] Long term, the consensus reached here could potentially be applied to [[Vermont House of Representatives districts]] and [[Massachusetts General Court]] districts as well (Vermont and Massachusetts are the few states that use county names in their legislative districts, as opposed to strict numerical naming). [[User:Woko Sapien|Woko Sapien]] ([[User talk:Woko Sapien|talk]]) 14:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
** [[Bennington Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Bennington Senate district]]
** [[Bennington Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Bennington Senate district]]
Line 426: Line 430:
** [[Windham Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Windham Senate district]]
** [[Windham Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Windham Senate district]]
** [[Windsor Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Windsor Senate district]]
** [[Windsor Vermont Senate District]] → [[Vermont's Windsor Senate district]]
*
* '''[[History of the Comoros]] → [[History of the Comoro Islands]]''' – (''[[Talk:History of the Comoros#Requested move 2 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – To differentiate between Comoros and the Comoro Islands/archipelago, which is made up of the country of [[Comoros]] and the French overseas department of [[Mayotte]]. The history of Mayotte does appear to be within the scope of this article [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 15:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
** [[List of sultans on the Comoros]] → [[List of sultans on the Comoro Islands]]
*
* '''[[:Murder in a Small Town (2024 TV series)]] → {{no redirect|Murder in a Small Town (TV series)}}''' – (''[[Talk:Murder in a Small Town (2024 TV series)#Requested move 2 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – This was created at the proposed title, but was subsequently moved to the current title by another editor on the grounds that the primary topic ''[[Murder in a Small Town]]'' is also a TV series — but that was actually a television ''film'', not a television ''series'', so the original title of this page was not in conflict with anything. (And while it's a film that had a sequel, its sequel had a completely different title, ''[[The Lady in Question (1999 film)|The Lady in Question]]'', and there's absolutely no evidence whatsoever that "Murder in a Small Town" is considered the overarching franchise title of the two films as a group, so the two films are in no sense a unified "TV series" under that title for the purposes of needing to overdisambiguate this one.) [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 14:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
*
*
* '''[[:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel]] → {{no redirect|Allegations of genocide in the 7 October attacks}}''' – (''[[Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel#Requested move 2 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – To match the current [[7 October attacks]] page name. [[User:MWQs|MWQs]] ([[User talk:MWQs|talk]]) 08:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
* '''[[:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel]] → {{no redirect|Allegations of genocide in the 7 October attacks}}''' – (''[[Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel#Requested move 2 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – To match the current [[7 October attacks]] page name. [[User:MWQs|MWQs]] ([[User talk:MWQs|talk]]) 08:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
*
*
===Backlog===
{{hatnote|Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.}}
* '''[[:Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque missile strike]] → [[Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque attack]]''' – (''[[Talk:Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque missile strike#Requested move 19 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – It is not at all clear that what happened was the result of missiles launched by a manned aircraft. Forward [https://forward.com/news/116269/goldstone-if-this-was-a-court-of-law-there-wou/ quotes] lieutenant colonel in the Israel army calling it "a drone attack", while [[The Guardian]] [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jan/04/mosque-blast-gaza blames] "Israeli shells" and "artillery fire" for the attack. [https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/jps/v41i3/f_0025611_20956.pdf An article] in the [[Journal of Palestine Studies]] also calls it "shelling". The most detailed account is given in the [[Goldstone report]] as "The attack on the al-Maqadmah mosque".'''[[User talk:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>(Please [[Template:Ping|ping]] on reply)</sub> 04:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
* '''[[:Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque missile strike]] → [[Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque attack]]''' – (''[[Talk:Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque missile strike#Requested move 19 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – It is not at all clear that what happened was the result of missiles launched by a manned aircraft. Forward [https://forward.com/news/116269/goldstone-if-this-was-a-court-of-law-there-wou/ quotes] lieutenant colonel in the Israel army calling it "a drone attack", while [[The Guardian]] [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jan/04/mosque-blast-gaza blames] "Israeli shells" and "artillery fire" for the attack. [https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/jps/v41i3/f_0025611_20956.pdf An article] in the [[Journal of Palestine Studies]] also calls it "shelling". The most detailed account is given in the [[Goldstone report]] as "The attack on the al-Maqadmah mosque".'''[[User talk:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>(Please [[Template:Ping|ping]] on reply)</sub> 04:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
*
*
Line 442: Line 443:
* '''[[:Right-of-way (property access)]] → [[Right of way (railroad)]]''' – (''[[Talk:Right-of-way (property access)#Requested move 23 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – The reasons for the request are set out in [[#Proposal to restructure and rename this article (to "Right of way (railroad)")]] above. The article as it stands has a lead which is essentially a [[WP:CFORK]] of [[Easement#Wayleave]]. The article itself is predominantly about the US railroad term, which (as per discussion), meets [[WP:GNG]] and merits an article in any case. The alternative, a Request to Split, seems inappropriate. If approved, I will delete the cforked material completely and replace it with a link to the Easement article. [[User:JMF|𝕁𝕄𝔽]] ([[User talk:JMF|talk]]) 22:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
* '''[[:Right-of-way (property access)]] → [[Right of way (railroad)]]''' – (''[[Talk:Right-of-way (property access)#Requested move 23 June 2024|Discuss]]'') – The reasons for the request are set out in [[#Proposal to restructure and rename this article (to "Right of way (railroad)")]] above. The article as it stands has a lead which is essentially a [[WP:CFORK]] of [[Easement#Wayleave]]. The article itself is predominantly about the US railroad term, which (as per discussion), meets [[WP:GNG]] and merits an article in any case. The alternative, a Request to Split, seems inappropriate. If approved, I will delete the cforked material completely and replace it with a link to the Easement article. [[User:JMF|𝕁𝕄𝔽]] ([[User talk:JMF|talk]]) 22:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC) <small>—&nbsp;'''''Relisting.'''''&nbsp;[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)</small>
*
*
===Backlog===
{{hatnote|Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.}}
* '''[[Norman Hunter]] → {{no redirect|Norman Hunter (disambiguation)}}''' – (''[[Talk:Norman Hunter (footballer)#Requested move 1 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – Per [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]], the footballer is the primary topic with respect to usage, because it is much more likely than all the other topics combined to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term. With respect to long-term significance, either no one is the primary topic or else the footballer is the primary topic, and it makes no difference because the footballer is the primary topic as to long-term significance. None of the other topics come close in terms of fame or significance. [[User:PearlyGigs|PearlyGigs]] ([[User talk:PearlyGigs|talk]]) 16:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
* '''[[Norman Hunter]] → {{no redirect|Norman Hunter (disambiguation)}}''' – (''[[Talk:Norman Hunter (footballer)#Requested move 1 July 2024|Discuss]]'') – Per [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]], the footballer is the primary topic with respect to usage, because it is much more likely than all the other topics combined to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term. With respect to long-term significance, either no one is the primary topic or else the footballer is the primary topic, and it makes no difference because the footballer is the primary topic as to long-term significance. None of the other topics come close in terms of fame or significance. [[User:PearlyGigs|PearlyGigs]] ([[User talk:PearlyGigs|talk]]) 16:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
** [[Norman Hunter (footballer)]] → [[Norman Hunter]]
** [[Norman Hunter (footballer)]] → [[Norman Hunter]]

Revision as of 17:10, 9 July 2024

This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a discussion-link-first format and in table format. 86 discussions have been relisted.

July 9, 2024

July 8, 2024

July 7, 2024

July 6, 2024

July 5, 2024

July 4, 2024

July 3, 2024

July 2, 2024

Elapsed listings

Backlog

References

  1. ^ https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-08&end=2024-05&pages=SS_Auriga|Charioteer_of_Delphi|HMS_Auriga_(P419)|AURIGA|Auriga_(constellation)
  2. ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20200811130329/https://www.wind.gr/
  3. ^ "Gombak Selangor Quartz Ridge". Unesco World Heritage Convention. Retrieved 2024-07-02.
  4. ^ "What is gender-based violence? - Gender Matters". Council of Europe.
TRCRF22 (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 15:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nuseirat refugee camp massacreKilling of civilians during Nuseirat raid and rescue – (Discuss) – The word "massacre" is listed as a non-neutral term at WP:POVNAMING and should not be used unless it's a WP:COMMONNAME, which it isn't in this case. "Killing of civilians" is perfectly neutral (see WP:KILLINGS) and covers the idea of "massacre" but in a neutral way. Two anticipated objections: *While there is currently a discussion to merge this article, I don't see any consensus there. If consensus does develop to merge/delete this article, then an admin is perfectly capable of closing this RM and redirecting this article. But until then, this article must still follow WP:NPOV. *While Israeli and Palestinian officials dispute how many civilians were killed, the fact that at least some civilians (including children) were killed during the raid is a established fact that RS state in their own voice: **"At the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in the nearby town of Deir al-Balah, the dead and wounded arrived in waves — men, women and children." Associate Press **"Many Palestinians, including children, were killed and injured in the area where the operation took place, with images and footage showing a large numbers of casualties." BBC News **"Video in the aftermath of the raid showed charred bodies scattered across streets in Nuseirat, while Palestinians could be seen gathering the remains of those killed. Bloodied children could also be seen arriving at a local hospital". NBC News Finally, the move target should be "Killing of civilians during X", where X is the name decided for 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation article per WP:CONSISTENT. Currently there seems to be a lot of support for moving that article to "Nuseirat raid and rescue". VR (Please ping on reply) 04:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Srebrenica massacreSrebrenica genocide – (Discuss) – I suggest that we rename this article to "Srebrenica genocide" now that the UN has issued its resolution on the matter today, designating July 11 as the International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica Please also check the discussion above. Njamu (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Israeli invasion of the Gaza StripIsraeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (disambiguation) – (Discuss) – Just like we don't have a date on Israel-Hamas war, as that is by far the most significant of the wars between Israel and Hamas, the current invasion of Gaza Strip is by far the most significant of the invasions of Gaza Strip. It is the longest in duration, most extensive in damage, the highest in casualties and received the most international attention. VR (Please ping on reply) 18:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2024 Nuseirat rescue operationNuseirat raid and rescue – (Discuss) – Most sources are dual referencing this as a raid, attack or assault rather than just as a rescue. Guardian "Israeli attacks in central Gaza killed scores of Palestinians, many of them civilians, on Saturday amid a special forces operation to free four hostages held there, with the death toll sparking international outrage." NYT "Israeli soldiers and special operations police rescued four hostages from Gaza on Saturday amid a heavy air and ground assault",CNN "Israel’s operation to rescue four hostages took weeks of preparation and involved hundreds of personnel, its military said. But the mission began with a trail of destruction in central Gaza and ended in carnage, according to local authorities." Selfstudier (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomographyElectrical capacitance volume tomography – (Discuss) – This page was originally titled "Electrical capacitance volume tomography" and was recently moved to a page called "Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography". These two terms are not the same. The latter is a broader term as shown in the wikipedia article edit on 5/14/24 in the introduction section. References are given for the distinction between terms. When the page was moved to the new term, it stated that the term ECVT is not widely used. However, in the later 5/14/24 edit of the introduction, citations are given for the term being used in China, Indonesia, and three different research groups in the USA. It is suggested that this page return to "Electrical capacitance volume tomography". A separate page should be made for "Three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography", if desired, as it is a distinct term that can include stacking of 2D tomographs whereas ECVT does not. Marashdeh (talk) 15:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Polyamorph (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Genocide of Indigenous peoplesGenocide of indigenous peoples – (Discuss) – "Indigenous" is only a proper name when adopted as conventional for a particular ethnic group, and when applied to the specific groups who have done so. As a general, global adjective it is not and cannot be a proper name (any more than the opposite, "colonial"), so should not be capitalized. See in particular the lead paragraph of MOS:CAPS: WP does not capitalize that which is not capitalized consistently across nearly all independent reliable sources, and "indigenous peoples" is not so capitalized (indeed, it is overwhelmingly lowercase [43][44], except in highly retrictive contexts that refer to specific populations who have adopted the term self-referentially as a name in English). This same situation is true of all such terms such as "native" and "aboriginal". "Aboriginal" is capitalized in reference to autochthonous Australians, and "Native" is capitalized in "Native Americans" in reference to the autochthonous peoples of what is now the US and sometimes (in mostly US usage) all of the Americas. But "native" is not capitalized (by the preponderance of modern reliable sources) in reference to Australians, nor "aboriginal" in reference to Americans, and neither is capitalized in "the native (aboriginal) peoples and languages of Siberia and Central Asia before the Soviet Union", etc. PS: There may be other over-capitalized articles of this sort, but perhaps take them one at a time, since some might pertain more narrowly to groups that have taken on "Indigenous" as a self-referential name/label.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  04:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC); revised 06:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tel al-Sultan massacreRafah tent camp attack – (Discuss) – News sources have called it "attack", "massacre", "strike" and "airstrike". It is not yet clear which is the most WP:COMMONNAME. "Massacre" carries value judgement, and "airstrike" obscures the fact that many of the casualties weren't killed directly by the airstrike, but were burned alive in the resulting fire. "Strike" is very similar to "attack", but "attack" is consistent with other similar events like World Central Kitchen aid convoy attack. I also think "Rafah tent camp" is more recognizable than "Tel al-Sultan" and most sources seem to use "Rafah tent camp" or "Rafah displacement camp".VR (Please ping on reply) 18:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Arab citizens of IsraelPalestinian and Arab citizens of Israel – (Discuss) – Per the smart suggestion from Keizers in the discussion above, this middle ground should address the concerns of both sides. Many editors have put a lot of time into this debate over many years, so we would ask you not to vote until you have reviewed the following discussions: * Talk:Arab citizens of Israel/Archive 8#Requested move 27 October 2021 * Talk:Palestinian citizens of Israel#Requested move 26 November 2021 * Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian citizens of Israel (6 March 2024, proposed by Keizers) * Talk:Arab citizens of Israel#Requested move 21 March 2024 Onceinawhile (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly incomplete requests

References