User talk:SwisterTwister

§

Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

Talk page watchers are welcome to answer if I am unavailable at the time.

• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #138

A kitten for you!

To help with your life...

Naraht (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Request on 18:06:41, 29 April 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Slothbearina

• Slothbearina (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Moritz Goetze (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Thanks for reviewing my draft of an article on the artist Moritz Götze. It was rejected - despite me providing references from a wide range of sources, as required. This time the reviewer's objection was that the artist's work needed to be in major collections. However, this was never mentioned as a prerequisite the first couple of times. I feel this is unfair. Will there be a different kind of objection every time I try to meet the requirements. Please, check the article again. Once it is up, many more people will contribute and add descriptions of the artist's notability. Thanks! Still hopeful, Slothbearina Slothbearina (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Slothbearina (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I made some fixes and accepted it. DGG ( talk ) 19:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

19:05:41, 29 April 2016 review of submission by MarkDPrindle

• MarkDPrindle (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Credorax (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm not requesting a re-review. I just have a quick question. Is the editor saying that I need more major sources (like Wall Street Journal, Forbes and TechCrunch), more sources overall (meaning that more financial/banking trades would be fine), or both? And what number of sources (major and overall) would be sufficient to show notability?

Thank you in advance!

MarkDPringle, I've independently looked at this, and I see no clear evidence of notability. The only substantial article is the one in the Independent. I consider it however the evident product of public relations--essentially a slightly disguised press release, and everything else is an unambiguous press release, or a mere notice. Techchruch is prone to publish material on new and non notable startup companies, and is not a discriminating source--and even it it describes the firm as "Credorax, a small startup" I could judge the likelihood of your being able to find adequate sources would probably depend on the size of the bank, and I see no financial information: that's pretty basic in an article about a financial institution.

But even more important, since I note you have written on no other topic, is the question of possible conflict on interest. Please see our rules, at WP:COI, and, if they in fact do apply, make the necessary declaration. See also our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. DGG ( talk ) 19:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

19:13:15, 29 April 2016 review of submission by Thy12

• Thy12 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:GreatApps.com (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister !!!

I made on the changes on the Draft for GreatApps.com which was eliminating the multiple URL's which was links to credible new sources that mentioned the company and its owner.

I am a little confused on the last remaining issue. Meaning, the links that were there before did come large media outlets which verified the company and the person (in terms of topic of conversation). This translated to different links from different sources. Thus, I am bit confused as to why then this would not be added to Wiki. I am sure you get this often, but I have seen countless items listed in Wiki that have no support whatsoever. At least for my post I did provide it.

Any guidance outside the standard template or reconsideration would be really helpful.

Thank you !!! Thy

Thy12 (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Thy12, since SwisterTwister seems a little busy at the moment, I've made an independent review of the draft. I see no notability, and no likelihood of there being sources to show it. The TNW reference is an obvious press release, saying whatever the firm wants them to say. The Crunchbase and alexa items are just directory listings, and cannot be used to show notability.

Please see also our rules on Conflict of Interest, at WP:COI, and our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure As you have written on no other topic, they might possibly apply. DGG ( talk ) 19:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

You are quite right that there are several hundred thousand articles in WP accepted in earlier years when the standards were lower that we need to either upgrade or remove. The least we can do is not add to them.

A kitten for you!

Some cute little fuzzy kittens to laugh at!

Chrisw80 (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I hope you stay

I'm sorry to hear that you are considering retiring, and sorry that I had to subject you to a deletion review this morning, on what seems to have been a bad day for you in other ways. I often encounter your engagement with AfDs, and have always considered your contributions to be valuable. I hope that you decide to stick around for the long term, even if you take a break. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

emails

David, I am not receiving your emails, just a note that they have been sent. I have sent you an email giving my email address. Please email me from outside WP. If you haven't gotten it, let me know on my talk p. (I do not know why it isnt working--other email from WP is reaching me OK.) DGG ( talk ) 04:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

But in response to what you have probably asked me, certainly don't become discouraged. Just go a little slower and do a little less. You are qwuite good at what you do, but you are sometimes trying to do more than any one person can properly manage. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

International Commercial Center

How would International Commercial Center be improved in DRAFT status to warrant inclusion as an article?--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

15:33:42, 30 April 2016 review of submission by JJBlvcklist

• JJBlvcklist (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Joey Fatts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have revised the entry and wanted to ensure it was resubmitted for approval properly. Thanks!

Take a look at this article

Hello! Have been researching about people that should have Wikipedia article, and has been creating articles with research (you can look at my contributions), however, I invite you to look at my latest article Delilah Alvares, if anything can be added, will like to receive a feedback from you! You are a nice contributor from Wikipedia, looking to get a longterm friend relation via Wikipedia with you. Nonetheless, check the article. OGfromtheGut (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

00:56:43, 1 May 2016 review of submission by JJBlvcklist

• JJBlvcklist (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Joey Fatts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello there, Thank you so much for all of your help! The sources used are from reputable news outlets including MTVNews, Billboard, Vibe Magazine and XXL Magazine. I also wanted to mention that the collaborations alone are with very well established names in the hip hop industry, I hope you reconsider the validity and find that Joey is more than worthy of an introduction through Wikipedia. His manager and I are hoping to have this taken care of quickly, as a press release is about to announce Joey's next tour, which will generate even more sources! I hope all of the citations are up to the standard, thanks again for everything your consideration!!JJBlvcklist (talk) 00:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not do that

Please do not unilaterally blank out articles and make a redirect. There are articles for airline frequent flyer programs. That is standard Wikipedia. See AAdvantage, MileagePlus, etc. Whiskeymouth (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft you declined got created anyway

Draft:Discovery and development of memantine and related compounds; uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists. The day after you declined it, the author, User:Tinktura1, cloned the content to Discovery and development of memantine and related compounds. That editor appears to have been a hit'n'run contributor, in keeping with a concern you raised when declining. Any thoughts about PROD vs AFD vs "meh, don't care"? DMacks (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I may consider deletion here soon. Certainly not the first time I've seen that and certainly not the last. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for reviewing my pages. Jaldous1 (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete BrowserAir

I apologize if its nothing more than a malware, other than Heartbleed. Feel free to delete BrowserAir if you wish. Thank you. VGN34D (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks. Prof TPMS (talk) 00:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hoax Governor of Jefferson

I just want to know how that is a hoax because they are actually getting Counties to join and vote for the state of Jefferson to be formed and it's not a hoax there Facebook and soj51.net is where I got everything from I make sure to get facts before posting so are you stupid or just rude about 51st state sorry for calling you stupid but I don't get how it's a hoax

I searched and nothing better suitable such as news, Facebook and other user generated websites are not solid enough for Wikipedia to accept. SwisterTwister talk 02:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your help The realreport (talk) 02:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krista Franklin

Hello SwisterTwister,

Isn't a link to the outcome of the deletion debate supposed to be included on the article's talk page? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I usually copy the one linked with the AfD template but it also occasionally happens there's none. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I need your help. I saw something on the page that's about me (Patrik Jensen) that needs to be taken out. I signed up for a wiki account just to find someone to help me, and I saw that you had been editing something on "my" page. That's why Im contacting you for help. I have a problem with stalkers and I need my address to be removed from my page (english version) asap. Thanks.

When that is done, would it be ok to also remove this thread here? Thanks again

Also, I dont know what the hell Im doing on these talk-pages so please excuse me for any violations or breaches of protocol. I just needed help with this one thing Felixation (talk) 07:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Calling Time (song)

Hello. I added some new infrmations. It is ok now? Eurohunter (talk) 10:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

How to add sources citation, reference, although the article is own self made

Hello, This is my second articles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Songs_of_Zion but it says cite source, How can I do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dewanlabung (talk • contribs) 12:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

When reviewing new articles

Hi SwisterTwister. When reviewing new articles, please take the time to skim them and see if you can tell if they are a copyright violation. I ask you to do this because CorenSearchBot is not operating at present, and neither is the search engine function of Earwig's tool. A good way to locate copyright violations is to perform a Google search on snippets of suspicious-looking prose. You can also ask Earwig's tool to perform a match-up for you on existing links on the page. If you need any help with this, please let me know. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Review Draft Page

Hi SwisterTwister, I made the changes you addressed in the review for the page. If it all looks good can you please accept it so it can be published?

Thanks Worldofwonder2015 (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

08:47:56, 3 May 2016 review of submission by Lx3h

• Lx3h (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Charged Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Page redirected with blank content

Dear SwisterTwister, The content of the page I created has been deleted and redirected to another page. I understand if you want me to review the content but where can I do that? LittleHelper8 (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

I have deleted a paragraph that sounded too promotional and reinstated the article. 202.40.244.196 (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Reviewer, thanks for your time reviewing this proposed article. I have added two references from Forbes and one from Reuters. Hope they fit your requirement of notability.

14:20:46, 3 May 2016 review of submission by Thedreamsociety

• Thedreamsociety (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Victoria Nixon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please specify what is wrong with the multiple references provided.

14:25:26, 3 May 2016 review of submission by Thedreamsociety

• Thedreamsociety (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Victoria Nixon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

OMG I forgot to sign my last post with four tildes (Thedreamsociety (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)).

I'd better do it again, so would yopu please be more specific about what, in your humble opinion, is not worthy or notable enough in the contribution for Victoria Nixon. I would have thought, as a previous reviewer had aid that her modelling career in itself makes her notable. four tildes (Thedreamsociety (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)).

Undo of Unbiased disambiguation page

Hi,

You were a little bit vague with your reason for undoing the revision to the "unbiased" page redirect - you said "Still not enough". Does this mean that disambiguation require more meanings applied to the term? And if so how many do you think would be deemed sufficient or relevant enough before a disambiguation becomes the better tool to use?

Thanks!

Ninjakem (talk) 14:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Ninjakem

Ninjakem Any additional, since what you added was not at all enough for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 17:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

22:35:39, 3 May 2016 review of submission by Wikienergydc

• Wikienergydc (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Energy Bar Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please reconsider your judgment regarding notability. This page cites more than thirty years of independent coverage in trade press, which took considerable time to compile. It also follows the guidance received from many other wiki users in chat room conversations over the last six months. Some specific guidance on edits would be much appreciated.

Wikienergydc (talk) 22:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Why

You just removed a deletion I put on an obvious vandalism. How so? Isn't the page inapporpriate? 2600:8806:204:CE00:1119:2CDA:B478:1489 (talk) 01:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Remember that Wikipedia is not WP:CENSORED and it's not serious vandalism since it links to a connected article. SwisterTwister talk 02:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Also, there's no CSD criterion for offensive titles. If that redirect were to be deleted, it would have to happen at WP:RFD.  Rebbing  02:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining. I did not know it was all right on Wikipedia to have potentially offensive words link to articles. 2600:8806:204:CE00:1119:2CDA:B478:1489 (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

It's a case-by-case thing. In this case, Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker tits links to Seven dirty words, a George Carlin monologue about those words, so it makes sense to redirect there.  Rebbing  02:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Tigray Tigrigha people

Since you patrolled Tigray Tigrigha people, I thought I ask-what should be done with this article? At first from reading it I thought it was vandalism but there is a group called that as it turns out-not sure though if it should be a article or what though. Wgolf (talk) 04:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I noticed. SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

It should not have been patrolled.[1] Copyvios need to be deleted or rewritten and then hidden. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I was at mobile at the time, so I was not as easily close to a keyboard to copy and paste to confirm. Not suprising that it was though, I myself was still contemplating vandalism, SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 06:46:22, 4 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Nairji

• Nairji (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gitanjali Sinha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you David for the feedback and appreciate your specific response. Will try and ensure to add more valid references and citations to make the article inclusion-worthy. Also would rectify the article with appropriate and correct referencing.

Thanks again. Nairji (talk) 06:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 06:51:02, 4 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Larryesbee

• Larryesbee (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:HexaTier - Unified Database Security (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - I think I really need some help here. The article you reviewed (HexaTier - Unified Database Security - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:HexaTier_-_Unified_Database_Security#cite_note-1) was my second draft for this topic, editedafter I had spent some time on the live chat pages, getting a lot of tips and direction. I feel I have included some really good, independent references (e. g. Gartner, Crunchbase, eSecurityPlanet etc.) and find it difficult to understand why it is still rejected. Please give me some more details and guidance if possible. I do not understand why well respected publications are not acceptable as showing "notability". Help, please.

with thanks Larryesbee (talk) 06:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC) Larryesbee (talk) 06:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Larryesbee You still need to add any additional sources as I mentioned at the Draft. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

10:23:44, 4 May 2016 review of submission by Gener8ter

• Gener8ter (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Festival Forte (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello.

I am trying to approve the wikipedia page regarding Festival Forte and have added more reliable independent sources. I have also followed the guidelines to create an article.

Please let me know if there is something else I need to add. If so, please be specific. I will be pleased to amend whatever is necessary.

Thank you Gener8ter (talk) 10:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Gener8ter

12:01:09, 4 May 2016 review of submission by Meridian00

• Meridian00 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Magnus Reed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I have added 4 google books references and a review of one of the books. I have photographic proof of the vernissage that was held in Havana main museum that I could upload as Cuba does not have any online presence.

thank you

(Meridian00 (talk) 12:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC))

Battle of Barawala Kalay Valley

I fixed the issues regarding the citations and have resubmitted for approval. Thanks.Don Brunett (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Don Brunett

Request on 19:21:10, 4 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by JTNwriter

• JTNwriter (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Inspire (company) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

From: John Novack (JTNwriter) Hi, First, thank you for your prompt review and feedback on the submission of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Inspire_%28company%29. I see some ways I can make improvements so it meets the standards.

I have reviewed numerous other company-specific articles. I have dug into a number that are Inspire competitors, direct and indirect. Several I list below seem to have less sourcing, and more "peacock" phrasing. And with all due respect to a few of the companies listed below, what they've accomplished and where they are in the marketplace isn't that notable--and if it is, it isn't clear in their articles. As for "Patient Power," there's a reference that it's the "U.S. leader in online audio and video programs for patients," and that is directly from the founder, Andrew Schorr. I bring up these 4 examples only to try to understand better exactly where and to what degree the Inspire submission still falls short. We are a leader in the fairly new niche in which we operate. Having an online community of three quarter of a million patients/caregivers is significant--far greater than HealthBoards, DailyStrength, and even PatientsLikeMe, which I think has an impressive and detailed Wikipedia page. Inspire works with most of the top 25 pharmas in the world is something few if any of the companies of our type have accomplished. Having exclusive partnerships with so many nonprofit organizations is unparalleled.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HealthBoards (peacock) 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MedHelp (peacock, and NO sources) 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DailyStrength (only 7 sources) 4. Patient Power LLC U.S. leader in online audio and video programs for patients hosted by Andrew Schorr, a medical journalist and 14-year leukemia survivor. Patient Power's reliable resources connect, educate, and empower patients to take a proactive role in their healthcare. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_health_communities

In sum, I appreciate your prior feedback, and I am committed to presenting the editors with the best possible submission for review. Thanks again.

John N.

JTNwriter (talk) 19:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

13:58:33, 5 May 2016 review of submission by Shyamw1

• Shyamw1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:G. Parthasarathy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I don't understand why this subject is not noteworthy of an entry in Wikipedia. G. Parthasarathy was a noted diplomat who was a very close advisor to Indira Gandhi. He advised her on foreign policy and was the first VC of the Jawaharlal Nehru University. He was India's permanent representative to the United Nations and I think he definitely deserves a place in Wikipedia. Can you please explain why he doesn't fit your criteria for inclusion?

Thanks very much

Shyamw1Shyamw1 (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Shyamw1 He is notable but I also asked to yo visit that link I listed there to format the sources. If you can, add any additional sources available. SwisterTwister talk 18:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)