In Tekken 6, I've recently achieved all the levels except where you have to fight Alisa after fighting Jin Kazama and I need help. I've read questions and answers on Q&A websites, but none of them are any help to me. I'd appreciate any help because I've been trying for many many days now. I know other people have said that to try and finish her henchmen before her, but the controller leads me to her instead. Lastly, I've posted this question on the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment section, but no one ever replied. SwisterTwistertalk20:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To anyone who finds this, I need help finding the place to ask a question other than the Help desk, I used to remember but I forgot. Thanks for any feedback.
There used to be a New contributors' help page (Ok there still is), but it has changed in function - I mention this one in case it is the one you were thinking of.
But you're right, this question belongs at the reference desk, and that is the only place where it belongs since it's entirely unrelated to editing Wikipedia. The question of where to ask is thus done. The underlying question about the game is not the proper subject of a helpme request, and is, in any event, extremely unlikely to be answered even if it was because this type of request only calls a small number of users to your page who monitor such requests so it is statistically unlikely to garner an answer. If you can't get an answer through the reference desk, you may not be able to get help on Wikipedia, but reposting the helpme request because you have not is not going to get you anywhere I don't think. You might try some off-Wikipedia places, such as asking an expert at the gaming section of allexperts. By the way, the nomral posting order on Wikipedia is always to have new post below old--this post would normally be placed at the very bottom of your page, which you will find will make it easier on responders because it is what they are used to.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 09:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
Hi, I did not understand your message. What is blanking the sandbox? I am brand new to Wikipedia. Does it refer to the header at the top of the sandbox in the edit screen? I accidentally deleted the first time, and it instantly reappeared, so I assumed it was somehow protected. But if "blanking" means something else, let me know. Tnx for help. EricDiesel (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, SwisterTwister,
First of all, please don't let a dispute with another editor (or any number of other things) put you off continuing with the Wikipedia project. From your contributions my opinion is that, though it's been a bit of a bumpy ride, I would urge you to stay around and keep contributing.
All that said, please read Wikipedia:Right to vanish, which outlines what steps you can take if you really want to have your user and talk pages deleted.
In summary: please stay and contribute; if you really want out then please read Wikipedia:Right to vanish
--Shirt58 (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed an WP:AGF mistake and made a correction for you. You had added that Ohio State was buying WWDC (FM) in August...while WWDC is the same frequency, it is located in Washington, DC. So I moved your edit in whole to the correct page at WWCD. Don't worry, I have made the same mistake before. :) Have a Good Day! - NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Happy SwisterTwister's Day!
User:SwisterTwister has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as SwisterTwister's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear SwisterTwister!
Well, yes... I looked at the history and I see a recent anon. edit in which a nonnotable cover of the song was listed, with no source provided. Were you that anon. editor? If so, or if not, a cover of a song, with no source to show why that cover was notable, is just cruft, which adds nothing to an understanding of the song or its importance. Ok? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive'01:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Recycling Photos
Hi. It seems you really like recycling, but the photos you are adding to numerous articles are problematic. Galleries of photos devoid of any context serve no encyclopedic purpose, and should be avoided. If there are articles on cities where recycling is an especially notable topic, you should write about that in the text of the article. --LordPistachiotalk22:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Even where the galleries already exist, their appropriateness is questionable. As per the policy on Image Galleries, galleries are not to be used to shoehorn in images that don't fit otherwise or have no encyclopedic value. And since every city in the developed world has recycling bins, sticking photos of them in every article does not serve to advance the reader's understanding of any subject. --LordPistachiotalk22:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You hit the nail on the head when you posted this: "Hmm, I see your point now, to not add something so trivial to an entire country." The point is simply that things that are ubiquitous features of any city, country, etc. shouldn't be mentioned in an article unless they have some kind of special significance to a particular place. Thanks for your understanding! --LordPistachiotalk22:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kunming, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Astronaut (talk) 08:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding galleries of recycling bins to various articles about cities around the world. Such edits are not constructive and have been reverted or removed. To persist in light of your recentdiscussion with Lord Pistachio, is bordering on disruptive. Thank you. Astronaut (talk) 17:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Cover versions
I notice that you are adding information regarding cover versions to Song articles. However, the information and hence the cover version needs to be notable e.g. for commercial success or mainstream critical aclaim. Simply being listed on a site such as All Music does not establish notability. Note that Hey Jude is a WP:FA and achieved that status without referring to any cover versions (and that this has been discussed on its talk page); also, as a FA, structural changes (such as new sections) should ideally first be discussed on the article's talk page. HTH. Wrapped in Grey (talk) 09:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(In response to your question on my talk) There is nothing that you can do to make a cover version notable; notability of a cover version is established by one or more reliable secondary sources that record the fact that the cover version has e.g. achieved commercial success or critical acclaim. For example, Joe Cocker's cover of With a Little Help From My Friends is a notable cover version having achieved both. Yes, I know that there are many non-notable cover versions currently listed in Wikipedia; I remove them whenever I have time. Note that a song may be notable for having had many cover versions made; if this is so then it will have been documented by a reliable secondary source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrapped in Grey (talk • contribs) 08:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will second Wrapped in Grey's concern. Most successful popular songs have been recorded by many others. Most of those other versions are of no special interest, and listing them out generally does not add any value to an article about the song and indeed weakens the article. Only remakes that were hits themselves or otherwise achieved importance need be discussed. In some cases, WP projects have set up separate articles, for example List of cover versions of U2 songs, just to keep this kind of material out of songs articles. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here's another opinion on the matter. Wasted Time and Wrapped in Grey are correct here. Just because a fact is verifiable does not mean that it should definitely be included. If every song article listed every single cover that ever existed, the pages would be huge. As such, we try to list only particularly notable covers on pages. This is really based on two policies: WP:INDISCRIMINATE, which says that we need to be selective in what we include, and WP:TRIVIA, which states that random facts shouldn't be introduced into an article. So for example, Jimi Hendrix's cover of All Along the Watchtower is worthy of inclusion on the song article because of how popular it was, whereas some small indie band playing the song wouldn't be listed because of how it's relatively unimportant. — HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!)19:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(posted on HelloAnnyong's talk page): I understand that, but what was odd was they seemed to have said the same thing about articles that didn't have any cover sections. What's wrong with that? Adding cover sections to article? SwisterTwister (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, just because a cover of a song exists doesn't mean that an article should list it. If a song was only covered by non-notable bands or in an otherwise non-notable way, then the article shouldn't have a covers section. It's not the case that a section of non-notable covers is better than having no section at all. — HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!)19:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weaponbb7 (talk·contribs) wants to offer a third opinion. To assist with the process, editors are requested to summarize the dispute in a short sentence below.
Viewpoint by (name here)
....
Viewpoint by (name here)
....
Third opinion by Weaponbb7
....
Re: Excuse me??!!
The definition of "smooth jazz" has been taken liberally by a number of stations for the duration of the format's existance. WNWV in Cleveland was just as guilty when they were known as "Smooth Jazz 107.3 The Wave," and they were standard bearers of the new age/smooth jazz format for nearly 22 years. In fact, that's really what "smooth jazz" should have been called all along. Just my opinion, but WJZA was clearly the norm and not the exception here. - Nathan Obral (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Got your message about adding an infobox. Had it on my list of things to do. I hope to add an infobox to this page and to the other albums too at some point.
Tochnit9 (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nick Ring
Thanks for switching back that edit. Someone out there wants to totally blank the Ring/Fukuda judging controversy and done that several times (maybe it is Nick Ring himself? Ha!). Anyway, thanks for the revert and keeping an eye out. Udar55 (talk) 15:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou
Thankyou for the welcome, I was having a little trouble finding some information so the articles you provided will be very useful :) --Berrie (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Marked as Patrolled
Just a little request. I've just come across a couple of articles you'd tagged on the unpatrolled list. I'm sure you already know, but if you scroll down to the bottom of the article, there will be a little link in square brackets that says "mark this page as patrolled". Clicking that means it'll get taken off the unpatrolled list and so no-one else will come across it on that list. I've marked them as patrolled. If you didn't find the article via the new pages list then just ignore me; you won't have had the option to mark it as patrolled. — Fly by Night(talk)22:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The page William Bagget Busa looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification?
I realize you did notify re Marla Hanam Busa. I recently agreed with someone observing that too many notifications can be discouraging, so perhaps that was your thinking. In fact, I'll assume that was the case, so I'll add a note to the page (my long term hope is that Twinkle could do something like this.) You need do nothing, except maybe look at my notification, and think about how we should handle multiple notifications in the future.--SPhilbrickT02:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reasons for deletion should be more specific and not broad generalizations - specify point by point so that it is very clear what you are referring to Afridel (talk) 23:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just letting you know I've removed your CSD A1 from K. Lakshmana, it was expanded substantially subsequent to your tagging. The article does still have issues, and I've left it with a BLPPROD. I have no objection if you want to pursue additional deletion processes if you think the BLPROD isn't enough. Monty84515:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you succeeded in surprising me. There are far more than 20,000 pages list here and on the corresponding pages for the other 25 letters, and similarly long lists for physics articles, and many on other topics. The frequent use of TeX seems like one of Wikipedia's most conspicuous features. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. Please do not place BLPPROD on articles that are not about people. The nannas is a rock band - please either use the notability tag for bands and musicians, or tag A7 if you feel deletion is appropriate. For more information, please see WP:NPP and WP:BLPPROD. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi David. Thank you for paying attention to the Toure page and being diligent about making sure no vandalism happens there. Please allow me to explain the edit I made: the erasure of a fact that's no longer a fact. (This is Toure writing.) I made an edit to the page—I erased something that is no longer true. I was slated to teach at CUNY this fall. That is no longer going to happen. So in the interest of honesty I erased it. I have learned that I should not edit my own page and have been honoring that but I thought this instance was different or unique in that the fact that that event (my teaching at CUNY) is now not happening is not something that would be announced and is not something most people would know anytime soon so I felt there aren't others who could be trusted to make that edit in a reasonable amount of time. So if I didn't do it now then the unfactual thing would stay up for a long time and possibly create a situation where it looked as though I was lying to make myself look better. Or that I'd have to answer questions that made it seem as though that was happening. Dishonesty about academics is seriously frowned on and I was simply hoping to avoid that misunderstanding. Could you possibly restore the erasure of that fact so that the page can be honest and up to date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.54.246 (talk) 16:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Inquiry on AfDs
Hi SwisterTwister,
I'm interestd in the AfDs process in Wikipedia and notice that you once involved in AfDs. I'm not sure whether you find that some discussers are admins while some are not. I'm just wondering whether you care about the adminships of the participants in deletion discussions. Does the referee's adminship affect your attitude towards the result of AfDs? Thanks. Bluesum (talk) 12:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for doing New Page Patrol, a very valuable and necessary task. A couple of points about your recent tags:
Beverly and Qamanirjuaq Caribou Management Board - if you can answer the question "What is this about?", then WP:CSD#A1 is not the right tag. This was clearly about the Board, but it gave no indication of importance so {{db-corp}}, i.e. WP:CSD#A7 would have been fine, and that's what I deleted it for. It's important to choose the right tag, so that the article author gets the right message.
Joshua Opada - once again, you can tell what it's about, so even though there's no information A1 is not the right tag, A7 is - {{db-person}} in this case. Also, you tagged it only a minute after it was posted: that's really too soon unless it is absolutely clear the article is no good. New users often put in only a word or two and then press "Save page" to see how it looks: it is WP:BITEy and unwelcoming if a speedy notice pops up at once. I agree this one looked like an autobio and was unlikely to be useful, but better give it a few minutes. By the way, there is a useful template {{userfy}} to give people who post an article about themselves, which tells them about their user page while emphasising that this is not a social-networking site. You can see what it looks like at User talk:Jopada314 where I have added it. It is a bit more welcoming than just deleting their autobio page, and you never know - some of the ones who come here thinking this is another Myspace may become useful contributors once they understand what it's really about.
A Macedonian has eaten your cookies! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating them. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:plate}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat the cookies with {{subst:munchplate}}!
Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The references just don't work out as I wan't them to and I cannot figure out which mistake I made. I used Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). just as I was supposed to.--HannahLiberty (talk) 07:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
Thank you for your help SwisterTwister, and I do need a lot of helo.I am very bad at this editing stuff but I dont want to quit!
Your question re RFA
Although your edit count is respectable, I think your chances would be much better if you wait a bit. I notice these numbers from Part 3 of this interesting page:
The (average) edit count of new admins has increased year on year. From a midpoint of ~11,000 to ~19,000.
Only one person since 2009 has gained adminship with less than 3,000 edits (He had over 1 million edits across wikis)
Editors who passed with less than 10,000 edits - 2009: 44 (36%), 2010: 20 (26%), 2011: 5 (18% so far)
Things that are certainly looked for are:
at least some constructive article work - DYKs, GAs, FAs are all good, but less important than many people think, I myself have very little, but in fact it was not a problem at my RFA
accurate CSD tagging
accurate contributions to pages like AIV and UAA
contributions to discussions such as AfD displaying a sound understanding of policy - because closing AfDs is one of admins' more contentious jobs
no (or not much) record of losing one's cool in stressful situations
Those may give you ideas for areas to work in to improve your experience.
I am not really a good person to ask about this, as I am not an RFA "regular", and for that reason I have not spent any time looking at your actual record. I suggest you spend some time reading recent RFAs, particularly failed ones, both to see the sort of issues that are raised and also to see if you can identify some regular contributors who would be better people to ask. Look for people who do not always support, and who seem to give sensible reasons. You will also see, and should be warned, that RFA can be extremely stressful - there are complaints about this, but I don't myself think it a bad thing, because an admin can expect stress and abuse and needs a thick skin.
Hi, you tagged that as unreferenced. This was incorrect. What was needed was to help the article creator with the reference in the infobox by putting ref tags around it and adding a references section. Along with this, the refimproveblp tag was appropriate. Incorrectly tagging an article as unreferenced can be rather WP:BITEy, and should be avoided. Thanks, LadyofShalott23:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I had no intention of being bitey but because the "references" cited were written as text and didn't have any indication of <ref>'s, I wouldn't have ever seen them. I did glance through the article, but my mind must've registered those references as part of the article. Cheers, SwisterTwistertalk00:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I would greatly appreciate it if you patrolled the pages you tagged for CSD. I constantly check an unpatrolled page to find a CSD tag on it. Thanks. --Σtalkcontribs06:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I, I Jethrobot, award SwisterTwister the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar because it's no fun hanging out in recent changes late at night unless you know you're going on your anti-vandalism crusade with other awesome people. I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I Jethrobot has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Welcome pages
Hi. When you tag for speedy an article from a new user, if there is no Welcome template on their talk page it is helpful to add one, preferably before the speedy notice - it makes it less WP:BITEy, and gives the newbie useful links like WP:YFA which should help them do better next time. {{firstarticle}} is a good one for that situation. It should be subst-ed, and include the name of the article, like {{subst:firstarticle|James swift}}. That particular template has an oddity: unlike most of them, it includes your signature automatically. If the first article was advertising, then {{welcome-spam}} is good. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, being an essay is also not grounds for speedy deletion. Being a blatant hoax is, and that is the criterion under Boing!saidZebedee ultimately deleted it. LadyofShalott11:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, despite GFoley's stating that as the reason, it is not a valid speedy deletion criterion, but there are valid ones that apply to both those "articles". For #1, it was a case of pure vandalism; #2 was a clear case of A7. LadyofShalott22:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is all a misunderstanding. I deleted 2 pages after "TheSigma" asked what criteria the page in question met. (In IRC) It was not a speedy deletion. It was an IAR delete, which I thought I made clear on IRC. My apologies, —GFOLEYFOUR!— 02:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A Barnstar of Diligence is hereby awarded to SwisterTwister for diligent and tireless contributions to Wikipedia, a keen eye for reverting vandalism, and for generally making this a better place. Evanh2008,Super GeniusWho am I?You can talk to me...05:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, a cookie!
Evanh2008 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Oh yeah? Well I enjoyed the SwisterTwister's cookie more. Now sitting here alone and having to go to work soon, at least I can think back to the happiness of those dark-chocolate chunks and moist crumbly goodness. DMacks (talk) 05:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you many times, SwisterTwister. I keep seeing your name pop up at the new pages and I know you do a lot of good work :) Thanks for patrolling Wikipedia. I wish you a nice weekend. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was yummy, and even yummier with a glass of milk!
B.wilson has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Hi SwisterTwister. I'm not sure whether you checked the content of this article carefully, I just want to notify you that it was a disgusting personal attack, not a simple not notable biography. I warned the creator on their talk page. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ever so much for the cookie. It was delish! Discospinster has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Thank you for the cupcake. Only problem was that it didn't have chocolate frosting.
What did I do or what didn't I screw up for a change to deserve the honor? I do see your comments alot in AfD land and are spot on. Bgwhite (talk) 06:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your AfD participation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Hatton. Since you made your initial comments, the article has been substantially revised by the editor who requested that it be restored after previous PROD deletion. Please reevaluate the article and see if your !vote in that AfD reflects your assessment of the updated article. Jclemens (talk) 18:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
5 albert square has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Hello SwisterTwister. I noticed you, or another editor created a Requests for Adminship page under your name, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles24/7(C)03:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'*om nom nom* Shanks for shthe brownie *om nom nom*'
Ttony21 has given you a cupcake! Cupcakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cupcake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †
I'm curently involved in fixing the article on Meital Dohan. I have not had any problem finding sources offering coverage of the actress and her work. Cleanup work is ongoing, but might you care to reconsider your !vote at the AFD discussion? Thanks, Schmidt,MICHAEL Q.22:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note. Over the last few hours it has gone through massive overhaul for sources. I feel BIO, ANYBIO, GNG, ENT, and CREATIVE are all meet. I hope you might now agree. Best, Schmidt,MICHAEL Q.03:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I suppose I'll have to go out and east myself a real brownie, though since I am trying to cut back a virtual one is probably better. I believe this is the first time someone has used that new feature to thank me. Any reason in particular? Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your demonstrated kindness has improved the countenance of others and promoted a more friendly environment to collaborate within! My76Strat (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nano Technology, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It can be redirected. Thank you. --Σtalkcontribs05:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it doesn't sound promotional to me, not at all. It sounds more like it is a teacher's lecture, designed to educate, rather than an encyclopedia article, designed to inform. Thanks, --Σtalkcontribs05:15, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited the article and a lot others because this Quincy2010 user seems to add in a lot of articles this Uqba Mosque, remarking how wonderful is this islamic tunisian building.
I've assumed that this guy is teenager who believes that his country and his church is important for all wikipedia users, in contrary of NPOV.
Check his list of contribution and archive versions of the respective articles he edited.
And with chocolate chips, too! Thanks for thinking of me in your ongoing effort to win over the WikiWorld with baked goods :-D . -Dewelar (talk) 23:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
4G technologies do not need to currently be capable of IMT-Advanced requirements, which all of the information I deleted assumes as true. I actually migrated 90% of the information to the correct page (IMT Advanced) as it was not describing 4G.
The only content I deleted was factually incorrect outdated comments (that were based on speculation about future technologies at a past date).
By keeping all of the additional incorrect information, it's misleading for people who don't know what's going on. Trying to help aggregate info others, as it was quite frustrating for me to try and figure it out all myself. I've recently researched and found it sad that the Wikipedia page was so unhelpful (it's typically my first and only stop for info). Hence my desire to improve it and perhaps clumsiness in doing so.
I'd politely request that it be reverted to the new version again.
Speedy is not about how quickly after article creation you tag it
Three minutes after article creation is a bad time to be tagging an article because you can't figure out what it's about. People accidentally hit the 'save' button rather than 'preview' all the time. If it doesn't make sense, especially if it has been interrupted in the middle of a sentence, then give them a little while to make another edit. There is no requirement that the very first draft of any article make sense to you.
If you want to patrol new pages, then please follow the recommendation to not patrol pages that were created mere minutes ago, but instead to look at least one hour back in the queue. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the editing help. Im new at adding stuff to Wikipedia, and have just worked on the coding for this for like the past 5 hours so really appreciate it :)
Hi,
You recently reviewed the article K. Dinesh, which I have now added a BLPPROD tag to, as it appears to be about a living person and has no references.
Thank you for your hard work in NPP.
Sure enough, the author has added references. It's on the companies website, so if this doesn't get any third party references it might get sent to AfD. I usually add BLPPROD quickly as it is really just a warning to the page author they must add references to avoid deletion. I find that {{Template:BLP unsourced}} doesn't properly get the message across that BLP's must have a reference. --Matthew Thompson(alt)talk to me bro!07:01, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When pages show up without any sources, claiming that "[XXXXXX] was charged with robbery, kidnapping, and homicide. [XXXXXX] was a sixteen year old divorcee, who had married at thirteen and divorced at fourteen.... [XXXXXX] was convicted...." please tag them as G10: Attack pages, rather than BLPPROD, so they will get speedily deleted. Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:50, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Attack? It appears to have been an actual event [3] with a few films based on it. [4] with a film starring Brad Pitt in a film loosely based on it [5]. Notability of the person is in question but the event was real.—Theda21:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry Theda, but G10 explicitly covers pages created and composed solely of unsourced negative biographical material. There was no neutral version to revert to, so I deleted the page. It does not matter if the page is based off a real-life event or even true. These pages are deleted per WP:BLPREMOVE (the reason for WP:G10) to prevent libel from entering. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Reaper Eternal. I understand your rationale Reaper Eternal, normally I would do the same thing but I was prompted to look because it stirred something in my memory probably from some TV show and I do usually check anyway. I would then have deleted it as an unremarkable bio. Don't personally think she is notable though some might disagree, if had thought so I would have referenced it. I wouldn't have noticed it if I hadn't gotten the tasty cookie.—Theda15:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You label my article titled Atlantic University College as an article of "Advertising". I disagree with your opinion, because Atlantic University College is only a "redirect" of the Wikipedia article previously approved and that was my creation called Atlantic College of Puerto Rico. What happens is that the college was renamed recently and I have done an "update" to the article.
Thanks for your quick answer. I appreciate very much your help. I will review the links that you sent me, to make necessary improvements to the article. I am very grateful. CarlosRomero1 (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So full...
Superbeecat has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
WikiPuppies has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Baseball Watcher has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
I just wanted to let you know that I have changed the deletion rationale for Acharya Bhagwant Shrimad Buddhisagar Suriswarji Maharaj Saheb. You tagged it with a BLP Prod. However, although the article does not explicitly say that the subject is no longer living, given that the article states he was born in 1874, it is a reasonable inference. Hence, BLP policy doesn't apply.
Hi, you marked this as "BLP unsourced", although (a) it said quite clearly that he was dead (OK it used "passed away", but pretty clearly!), and (b) it has a link to a news item about him on Ireland's national broadcasting service. PamD23:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SMasters has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
editing help for Michelewriter
Wikipedia is so totally confusing! I couldn't figure out how to reply to your offer of editing help. The name of the page is Michele Landsberg. Thanks for offering to help.
Michelewriter (talk) 04:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I recently saw that you welcomed a new editor who edited an India related articles. I just wanted to let you know that we've created a new template specifically designed for those who edit India related articles. The template is at {{Welcome-India}} and can be used with Twinkle just like other templates. Thanks for welcoming new editors to Wikipedia. Zuggernaut (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We're conducting research with Wikipedia to improve the Wikipedia mobile and editing experience. We would really like to get feedback from you, and to have you participate in our study. Please let me know if you are interested. AnswerLab-Nick (talk) 22:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC) AnswerLab-Nick, [email protected][reply]
Icseaturtles has eaten your cookies! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating them. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:plate}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat the cookies with {{subst:munchplate}}!
Re your message: They were not blocked, but they are now. I didn't revoke their talk page access as I usually don't do that until after they spam some more post block or if they are one of those obvious throwaway shoe/clothes/jewelry/rock crusher spam-only accounts. We'll see how it goes and if they got the message. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Elizium23 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Anikingos has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Thanks for your help with my "Devi Nampiaparampil" page. I just added more information to the references section. Do you mind taking another look at it?
Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. I'm just letting you know that you appear to have passed Hitler Youth Badge without tagging it as needing references or applying a stub template. If I am mistaken, please let me know on my talk page. Keep up the good work! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not for publication. It is just a draft that is being discussed. You will be informed when the the survey takes place. Thank you for your interest. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
you seem to have also passed Roberto Henderson CADCII. But it's an unsourced BLP, and should have been so marked, and, in my opinion BLProdded, for I can find no references at all, not even in google. In addition, the name ofthe article would in any case need changing according to the MOS to Roberto Henderson
I see a number of other cases also where you have missed significant problems. You might do well to check the articles from your patrol log tin the last few days to see what others have thought of them. For example, Larry Bock (Biography), deleted as a copyvio--an article cited so irregularly and titled by someone who clearly does not know our practices, should arouse considerable suspicion. Mette Bach should at the least have been tagged for its very apparent problems; Ivailo Valeriev Iliev needed more than a BLP prod--the content of the article claims only he had an injury that prevented him for competing & I've tagged tit for speedy deletion. Toronto Dermatological Society. is so promotional and non0notable that it needed marking for deletion by one means or another--I used A7, but G11 would also apply. SGHS Rowing Club should have been marked at least for notability, but I went one step further and nominated it for AfD. Ditto with SnapComms, though I could have used speedy. Stone Sink Maintenance is a classic example of how-to, and has been prodded. And, just how Hartley primary school needs to be merged--unless there is something very exceptional, that's what we do with all primary schools.
I haver not gone into all this detail in order to be critical in a negative sense; rather, you do so much patrolling, and so much of it is good, that I think you would find it helpful to see some of the problems, & I hope you'll take it in the right spirit. In general, my experience is that very few articles contributed by first-time contributors do not need a tag for at least one problem. Thus, I find it helpful to look at the contributions history as well as the article history,as well as the article. Then, if it appears that the contributor may show possibilities of becoming a good editor, it is possible to help them more specifically than just the templates. I see you've been checking up to three articles a minute: if I'm doing more than one a minute, I find I'm going too quickly. DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop reverting Professor Mandelbaum's Wiki page back to the original posting. I am his assistant, and this is how he wants the page set up. If you would like to discuss this further please contact me at (Redacted).
Then in that case you should not be pressing the "Save page" button at all, if you do not agree to let your work be reused or edited. →Στc.04:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I always enjoy seeing your username patrolling. By the way, in order to keep the templates from smushing together, you have to leave a blank line between them. You would lose your trademark, but the messages would be easier to read. :) Danger (talk) 10:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your helpful comments. My first time to write articles in wikipedia. More of a hit and miss process until I catch up on the writing and editing manuals. How do I delete the original pages of my articles? They are effectively dead pages after the new pages were created?
Hey, I'm new and was wondering if you could adopt me, also, I wanted to know, how do I create an article?
Thanks,
MickeyWay 18:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Adoption/ Question
Hey, I'm new and was wondering if you could adopt me, also, I wanted to know, how do I create an article?
Thanks,
MickeyWay 18:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GloriousWeekday (talk • contribs)
VMS Mosaic has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
RA0808 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Mayfrancis has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †
Mayfrancis has given you some Nice Koekjes which promote fellowship, goodwill and WikiLove. Hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the good flavor of Nice Koekjes around Wiki World by giving someone else one. Maybe to a friend or, better yet, to someone you have had disagreements with in the past. Nice Koekjes are very tasty and have been known to calm even the most savage beast. Enjoy!
Actor Cal Giardina is changing his stage name back to Cal Rein, his website and IMDb will be updating soon. You can help by changing back and fix the name of the page to Cal Rein too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Powerstorm (talk • contribs) 06:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jcaraballo has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Hi, I'd just like to pop by and say that I've completed reviewing your edits, with my comments being posted here. Maybe you can do me a favour and review mine. 06:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello SwisterTwister! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Chomp Chomp Chomp
Fiftytwo thirty has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
I was not the author of this page, but was trying to view it as a reference after reading the wiki for its author at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Gooch . Gooch is incredibly well known in the music community as the prolific drum and bass artist 'spor' as well as the house artist 'Feed Me'. Additionally, 'Feed Me's Big Adventure' is one of the very few LPs released under Mau5trap records, which is run by deadmau5, arguably the most well-known house artist today.
Long story short, anything Gooch himself releases is noteworthy and anything under mau5trap records is noteworthy so can you undo your patrol of that page? Thanks
Hi SwisterTwister! I've just come across one of your edits (or that you have been patrolling new pages), and noticed that you might appreciate some help with references.
I case you're not aware, you might consider using this tool – it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script:
// Add [[WP:Reflinks]] launcher in the toolbox on left
addOnloadHook(function () {
addPortletLink(
"p-tb", // toolbox portlet
"http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py/" + wgPageName
+ "?client=script&citeweb=on&overwrite=&limit=30&lang=" + wgContentLanguage,
"Reflinks" // link label
)});
Ponyo has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Breawycker has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Doctoroxenbriery has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Slon02 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Note
After some time on wikipedia I realized that it is important not only to revert but also warn (those who have vandalized before) - otherwise they can't get blocked for any reasonable period. Warning is easy - there is a standard subtituted template which can be copy/pasted from some notepad window or even typed in, like {{subst:uw-unsourced1}} ~~~~ or {{subst:uw-test2|Article name}} ~~~~ , and the keywords are intuitive: unsourced, test, vand, spam, npov, biog, error, etc. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cross with you at WP:RCP (good work, by the way) and see that you do warn, but not always, and just wanted to share my experience. I also skip warning when I "know" that there is little chance this IP will edit in a foreseeable future, but I try to warn any time I see that this IP did vandalize before. We don't know "who sees the warning", and it is often more than one person vandalizing from a school IP. Yet, we can't block that IP if not warned. Materialscientist (talk) 06:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
X-179 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
!
X-179 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Thanks for the cookie
Oddbodz has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Many thanks! Nice to know someone appreciates it. I've seen you before and love the username. Have a wonderful holiday season! Regards, Manway21:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the content.
I am just getting my feet wet here at Wikipedia, I was not sure what the user page was all about, I was not sure if was a type of profile page or what, so I hope I did not offend anyone.. Thanks.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WesternDressageUnversity (talk • contribs) 08:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I saw this edit and was wondering why you removed the 'unreferenced' tag. IMDb isn't considered a reliable source, but now the article is not 'unreferenced' so I've placed two maintenance templates on the article: 'refimprove' and 'unreliable sources'. Let me know if you think that's an issue. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 05:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm Mike Shell (Crippled Wolf), newly registered with Wikipedia, and a member of the steering committee of Quaker Universalist Fellowship.
We do not know who created or has been editing the article. However, we would like to make it both more accurate and more informative for readers.
A colleague of mine on the committee has been trying to expand and correct this stub article, and her edits keep being undone. Could you give me some guidance on the process? I have a lot of text and references which we could add, yet I don't want to go around in circles.
Thanks for your reply earlier today, informing me about COI issues. I understand and value the principle, though it's a bit troubling to discover that someone else has created an article about our organization which we ourselves are not allowed to correct.
I have left a message on the article's talk page asking for collaborative help.
Hey, thanks for the welcome, I have a friend on this called Danceyman, and he was banned indefinitely for vandalism, but he didn't do it, the reason I know he didn't do it, is because I did it, I was really drunk at the time, Danceyman is a non-alcoholic, and we hacked his account and vandalised axl rose and Nickelback, looking back on what I've done in the past when drunk made me give up alcohol, but Danceyman is paying the ultimate price, he did make an appeal, but it was turned down by a user Kuru, I've messaged Kuru, but he has ignored me for some reason, but continues to answer other people's queries which is quite frutrating, but I know you'll listen to me because you're a very friendly wikipedian, and I'm really sorry what I did to those pages, but I want to benefit wikipedia in a positive way now, and I'd really appreciate it if you let Danceyman back in, he's a really nice guy. Maximuman (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear SwisterTwister. Thank you for your welcome to Wikipedia in English. I have been working for one year in Wilipedia in Spanish, which certainly requires more efforts.
Best,
--TransportObserver (talk) 06:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please help me with the Feast of the Immaculate Conception?
I dont want to get in trouble but the last reference link on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception is a dead link. It is not verifiable and I have many Lutheran relatives (I am a devout Roman Catholic) who reject the idea of Immaculate Conception within their religious services.
Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:NC4RSO, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is not promotion - it's a good-faith request for assistance; not in the right place, but our bureaucracy is hard to navigate. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!
Thanks for the message, SwisterTwister! I'd really like to contribute more but I'm still learning - darn those training wheels! Appreciate the pointers and the links. Please feel free to share more when and if you see things. Many thanks!
Thank you for the welcome and all the helpful links. The community of Wikipedia editors and contributors is turning out to be just as fascinating as the content.
Thanks for the welcome and the info on why the page was flagged. The page I am referencing is the one for Martha Ballard. The older version was better organized and more usable in an educational setting. I have used the old page in the past for some of my classes (in fact that is how I discovered the new version as I reference it at least twice a year). The newer version reads like it is an uploaded middle school book report. The older version had better citations and a greater diversity of information as well as links to other pages.
Thank you for the welcome ! I have already improved and created several articles on Wikipedia (principally French, English and Latin) but it's true I had no talk page, thank you for having created it ; I will also create soon my user page ! SenseiAC (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re: "It does not matter who puts a speedy deletion on an article???"
I am new to the whole Wikipedia editing process, but something is wrong with this picture!!! (re: "It does not matter who puts a speedy deletion on an article???").
It appears that anyone can vandalize a work - with of without cause? I don't really care about the Henry Adams article, I am more concerned with the basic principle / practice.
Questions:
Can any Wikipedian, at any level, delete an article? &
Is there a process whereby an editor can appeal a decision to delete?
Re, Re: "It does not matter who puts a speedy deletion on an article???"
so do i have to communicate with you on your talk page, and you communicate with me on my talk page? (in other words - if i respond to you on my page, you will never see the response?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mormonfaith101 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How many is too many links?
Hi David -- As veteran Wikipedian, perhaps you can tell me how many links are appropriate to an article. I've read the help sections are there doesn't apear to be a definitive answer. See the related Embroidery article, it contains many of the links you removed.
Cheers for correcting my silly error in missing the refheader on the above page I started. I'm making a number of edits on articles about visual impairment organisations, particularly on Merseyside. It's the first time I've made anything beyond the odd grammatical correction - I wondered if you'd mind casting your eye over another similar (but more in depth) page I've started, Bradbury Fields? I know it needs expansion, but if you've got any particular suggestions for cleanup or style I'd find them most useful. Thanks again. Jonathandeamer (talk) 19:06, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I see that you left some comments on my new page regarding the Lake Worth Historical Museum. I assume that you are a volunteer and so appreciate the time you spend making Wikipedia a reliable info source.
I attempted to address your comments by adding references and links. Not sure what the protocol is. Do you go back and look to see if the concern has been addressed? Do you then delete the comments from the top of the page as appropriate?
Hi- I have posted info on a primary campaign opponent for the 2012 election of the US House of Representatives. The info has been deleted removed and marginalized by editors who I suspect are paid agents of the established politician. This reeks to me of wiki corruption--what do I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JokerJane (talk • contribs) 22:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When i am writing a page can i use authentic information from govt websites??When i did this to the Indian Revenue Service page And the directorate of investigation page it was deleted by a another user? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirmal95 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can see from the article [Alor, Anambra] revision history that you made a reversal on my name and contact details which I added as a comment such that anyone that wants to liasie with me on any of change or contribution which I made on the article can easily get through to me. The reason for my doing so is because I hail from Alor and will like to interact with other users that are also contributing to the article with the view of improving on the existing information on the site about my hometown.
I hope my explanation helps this time around. You can notify me via the talk page if you're still having issues with my contact details inclusion on the article.
Hi. The PROD tag on that article has been replaced by the correct "Translate" tag, which is effectively saying "Translate or delete", and is a more appropriate way to deal with articles written in foreign languages. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Feedback
What I want to see is the ability to hide all the rate templates on all Wikipedia pages, I am tired of looking a the clutter. I think this project is not worth the effort and should be cancelled. Thanks. JunoBeach (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Arnel Refuerzo (talk) 06:24, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Hello SwisterTwister, Thanks for redirecting my new page, actually i noticed that mistake, but the problem is i do not know how to edit the title page. Anyway, thanks again...[reply]
Help please
I have been pushed back by some admins. I have dome mistakes unknowingly but the guys have been very rude and abusive to me. I have put my request for undeletion of PureView Pro at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#PureView_Pro. please remove me from Wikipedia and my articles. I would not like to contribute any articles anymore. Thanks cchallag (talk) 13:14, 29 February 2012
There are actually a few medical terms that I would like to add, one of them was veins of retvius. At the moment I don't have time to edit them and organize the content with cited sources, but I plan on getting to it soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MedicalJatt (talk • contribs) 21:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice SwisterTwister!
I will be sure to use the signature and the edit summary functions for future entries!
Just wondering... why did you send me a WELCOME TO WIKIPEDIA thing? I have been on here for a while, and I don't need your help. I am not meaning to be mean, but yeah. I don't need your help. Iluvmarchingband 00:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iluvmarchingband (talk • contribs)
ps: is there any way to correct the title, diplomat should be capitalized as follows: New Diplomat. Thanks again! Kidjef (talk) 04:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image
Hi! my account on wikipedia does not allow me to upload images yet, and i think that the page "Sanctuary (tour)" from Within Temptation needs the promotional cover art of the tour, if you could put it on there, it would be great ;)
I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.
t's because there is no Canada-college-stub, you have to use Canada-university-stub. As you can see, the Canada-university-stub is mentioning college: "This Canadian university, college, or tertiary institution-related article is a stub". SwisterTwistertalk04:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not all view Québec colleges as post-secondary, and consider it equivalent to "Grade 13". A high school diploma from Québec does not meet the prerequisites for University (or College in the US) admissions. In Québec it is considered post-secondary, so how do we objectively evaluate? Please do not break discussions up by responding in a different spot, it makes it difficult to follow.--UnQuébécois (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SisterTwister, I see you removed the PROD BLP at Klara Min, looks like because a cite was added to "New York Concert Artists & Associates." However, "New York Concert Artists & Associates" is Klara Min's own organization. It isn't an "outside" cite or reference. Does that still meet Wikipedia criteria for removal of the PROD BLP? Thanks for helping educate me... (I'll look for reply here.) Zad68 (talk) 14:31, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for both the welcome and the warning. I did look over the guidelines before making any edits, which is why the only changes I made to the page were to add category tags on things that were specifically mentioned in the article (there was a notation that more categories were needed). As I understood, edits were allowed by people connected to a page, they were just cautioned to be careful. If I did something wrong, please let me know!
I think I signed everything I did (at least I hope I did), but as a new user, I appreciate your concern. Shanon216 (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!
Hello SwisterTwister and thank you for your welcome and for the useful links!
As you suggested I have added on the page [Officina Stellare] two references, may I ask you to check if these are OK?
Thanks a lot for your help! LaZingo 09:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaZingo (talk • contribs)
in the englisch wikipedia. As you can see, I´ve been loggt only in the german wikipedia for 7 years and I´m hardly impressed of the friendly and easy going style of communication here (I did expect some -not so nice- advises). New articles are there usualy deleated in less than 30 seconds if there are mistakes like I did. In the german Wikipedia every saying must be proved with reverences and links to the documents, expecially external links when there is no reference inside Wikipedia. So I beg your prardon and for your assistance: Please tell me directly whitch external link is excessive or inappropriate at your guidelines here. Same wish at category: I did set Category:Fibers and Category:Composite materials and do not know what´s going wrong with it. At last: Sorry for mistakes, I did write less in english and won´t waste time in using a dictionary in discussins like -of course- i do in writing articles. Please advice me. --Personaldisponent 08:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Swister
Hi there -
Thanks for the advice and input on my recent page. I've tried to fix the stuff you pointed to, such as the bare links, so i'd really appreciate if you'd take a second look and let me know if these matters are now fixed:
- the bare links
- the category
I really thank you, I needed this for some other pages. English is not my first language and I appreciate every help especially on Wikipedia on which rules I am not good. All that things on my page are about me and they are rue, My links are Last.fm and Octagon Records web pages, Thanks for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.59.251 (talk) 04:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ottobre in Poesia
Hi David!
i saw your changes on the page Ottobre in Poesia; i am not very expert about wikipedia moreover if in english! Even if you gave me the link, cau you explain me better about reflinks tool? I guess its a code or something that i have to type in the page.
thank you :)
--Stefiro (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Swister Twister. Yeah, I am trying to redirect Arturo Garcia Alvarez to the Arturo G. Alvarez page because he is also known as this. Not sure if I am getting it right. Please advise. Thanks so much.
I love the description given by you in your user page....especially the last lines which say, "We aren't tolerating vandalism. We will warn. Vandals, expect us." You seem to be a Wikipedian who simply hate vandalism.....like me!! My question was that what will happen if are unable to give even one reference like some of these pages have or don't have references.....if they have it's very less. The pages are: Samta, Madanmohan-jiu Temple and Sarat Chandra Kuthi. Please help us by adding reliable resources. Please leave me a Tb template. --Jagadhatri২০১২04:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In most cases, if an article is unreferenced/unsourced, it can be either proposed to be deleted (see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion) or simply tagged as "unreferenced/unsourced". The articles (Samta, Madanmohan-jiu Temple and Sarat Chandra Kuthi) seem to be sourced except Madanmohan-jiu Temple. Unfortunately, I believe I would be unable to help with those articles as I am unfamiliar with those subjects. Lastly, I would suggest using "show preview" (located next to "save page") when contributing as this will lower exhaustion on the servers and save history space. It will also allow to change your contributions before officially submitting them. SwisterTwistertalk05:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes....the articles have been tagged as "unreferenced/unsourced" and I do know that there's a show preview button but as I am very very eager to contribute to Wikipedia I often don't use it and that's the problem my server gets exhausted but when I create a new article I do see a preview. And when it comes to helping by adding reliable resources I can understand that you aren't familiar and you will be unable to help but I just gave it a try. Anyway thanks that you tried to stretched a helping hand towards me. --Jagadhatri২০১২07:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Beppe Costa page
Hi David!
i have seen the page of ottobre in poesia, i'm happy now the page is ok; i have done the same changes in the page of Beppe Costa and maybe even that page may be ok? ley me know
--Stefiro (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Philogresz site
Dear SwissTwister,
I've been working very intensely to write down real facts on the page of Philogresz.
Everything is cited and referenced properly.
If I should make some improvements, please be so kind to tell me so, I'm totally open to suggestions and confrontation
This is a tough one. I found a list of his transfers, so he seems without a team currently defeating any chance of a team bio being out there. If I type his cyrillic name into google news I get results, but I'm struggling to figure out if any are useful even after a translation. Association football's not my strong suit but it looks like sources might exist, so I'm borderline on whether or not to delete it. There was a prod earlier in the history so I don't think it can be prodded a second time; AfD might be best, since if sources exist I'm sure the footy crowd can find them better than I can, and if they don't then it'll be gone. WizardmanOperation Big Bear18:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Process Question
Hi SwisterTwister. I'm a noob here and you sent me a "welcome" when I joined so I'm hoping you can help me with this question. I edited an article which included a sentance which didn't at all match the cite. My edit was quickly undone with the comment (Undid revision 483857133 by EdWitt This is a GA: restoring content supported by a RS) I assume RS means "reliable source"? But the point was the reliable source didn't state what was written in the article. I asked for an explanation but haven't received one yet. Just curious what I should do, what's the process? Thanks. EdWitt (talk) 03:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article is Nissan Leaf. The sentance in question states, "An optional CHAdeMO fast charge receptacle can be added for US$700, but is only available as a factory installed option, only on the SL model, and it is not compatible with the SAE J1772 standard connector now in use in the US."
The cite states, "The likely standard won't be compatible with the "CHAdeMO" quick-charge hardware in your Leaf, or any of the other Asian electric cars that offer it."
Today there is no SAE fast charging standard and it has been delayed many times. The cite says likely standard, thats a long way from an actual standard. EdWitt (talk) 03:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. So am I following the correct process? I'm trying to learn here. I could imagine a lot of thrash changing articles back and forth. So if an edit is undone, when it clearly shouldn't have been, what should the original editor do? EdWitt (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! To celebrate the 10th anniversary of Wikipedia the German language Wikipedia has started a petition to identify Wikipedia as UNESCO’s first digital World Cultural Heritage Site. If you share this opinion, please join our initiative.
I think I read through that list 3 times and still couldn't decide. I was going to fudge and just say A1. Somebody needs to put together a cheat-sheet! Thanks for relieving me of my confusion. 24.28.17.231 (talk) 04:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your input considering the Loffice page! I understand what you mean but I encountered some problems in it, maybe you can advice in this?
What I tried to do now is make more general references (for example, a general reference to coworking in Budapest which features loffice and other coworking places, and a general reference to the European Coworking Conference instead of to the specific speaker list), you think it is an improvement?
The only big problem now in terms of third party sources is the second reference, the only place I could find a collection of articles relating Loffice was on the Loffice website itself. Do you think it would be better to make specific links here (for example: Elle Dekor Magazine, issue 7/2011) to a few of the publication?
Thank you for your opinion and help. I figured now a days people dont wish to search for stuff, so might as well keep the links there to let people discover his music more easily, such as the Soundcloud link. Maybe the youtube/myspace was excessive. Are you an admin here on Wiki? Im trying to figure out why my page might be deleted? Ive even spoken with Felix and he loved what I wrote and how it was set up.
I understand where you're coming from, but this is Felix Cartal, a canadian dj... the links/references are the best I can post. He isnt interviewed by Rolling Stone or any other type of massive publications really. I have NME, Pitchfork, CBC, Itunes, Punknews references that do fit the criteria, only 3 sources are from blog interviews, which is really the best place to get printed information on the artist. Please try to understand that and not putting that tag up all the time. Id like to keep the page as clean as possible, I welcome any informative additions if you have any. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulbonard (talk • contribs) 04:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment, I put the "wikify tag" because I thought the article could an infobox and may be simpler than adding multiple tags. I can change the "wikify" tag if you think it seems more appropriate. SwisterTwistertalk00:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that any relevant infobox exists, and therefore it is impossible to add one. Besides, what would you put in an infobox?
Sorry for the delay in responding to your question. My recollection of that exchange is that it had to do with the ongoing debate/edit war over the IMDB's Top 200 movies list, and whether it should be mentioned in The Shawshank Redemption article. The long-standing consensus among experienced editors is that it is not relevant, that the voting is by fans, and that IMDB is not a reliable source. But, it keeps getting added again and again. Take a look at the article talk page for the repeated discussions of the issue. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive14:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
iheartradio Article
I was curious, why exactly did you delete the amount you did without prior talk, because I would have loved to provide reasoning for all of the things you deleted. gwickwire | Leave a message04:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You
Hello,
Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia and for the useful information.
Thanks guy, i spent 2 hours writing all the info for the page and then found you had edited it and i lost all my info. Really, Seriously, Thanks a million.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnymc1984 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
riverside
sorry wasn`t you after I looked closer. What happened was while I was writing someone called chris had cleaned it up a small bit and when I tried to save my new info, the site asked me to re-check my info and decide what to save in upper and delete in lower case. So got kind of confused after the page went blank.
I had ensured that all content mentioned in the page is taken from published newspaper articles in Indian national dailies. Also, i had taken the content pattern from already existing pages of such programmes (Teach for India, etc.).
In case, some portion appears promotional please can you mention specifically so that i can immediately remove/re-edit it.
Please help. This is my first article on Wiki. :o)
Hi Swister Twister, I want soy to yo, that my first block was just, but te second (For an week) was whitout a good reason, they just block me, and I'm sad for that, I need you help, wikipedia is my life, and I don't know how to do. Tnanks--Phoenix"15:54, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yakitatej
I declined your speedy as it doesn't seem like spam. I've MfDed it as inappropriate use of userpage and using as free webspace. Peridon (talk) 10:41, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm always reluctant to block the editing of a talk page, and usually do so only if it's used for abuse. Since this is the first transgression in two years, I've added a warning, and put the page on my watchlist. I'll remove talk access if there is any recidivism. Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me?06:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Down the Wire
It was not necessary to inform me of your edit, but what a strange thing, he is certainly not a horse rider hahaha. I probably had confused the last two lines within Julio Fernández (disambiguation) and clicked on the wrong one /o\. Thank you and happy editing! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Help for Uchunari Coffee page
Since this morning I have worked on the content and the aspects which were not neutral. I think it's better now but I would like to have your advice on it, please.
Furthermore am I allowed to remove the two comments on the top of the article, if I have understood, when I edit the article I just have to erase it so am I allowed to do it ?
Many thanks.
--Annerella (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear SwisterTwister
I created the page "Uchunari coffee" and I had now two messages, one is telling me that I use bare URLs for citation but I made changes and I hoped that it was good, could you please tell me what I have done wrong ?
Secondly I have a message saying that my tone is not neutral, is it possible for you to give me example of what I have to change?
Many thanks in advance, your help will be invaluable.
--Annerella (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your quick answer.
I will work on the part you highlighted.
By the way can I remove by myself the 2 messages on the top of the article ?
--Annerella (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My Deesh Page
What is wrong with this page?
It's a work in progress so I don't understand why I am being threatened with deletion. Deesh is a well known figure in Scotland and I feel with this page being created many more people can enjoy researching and learning about him.
Hi there, thanks for your hints and tips, as you can see, very new, and trying to apply my very specific area of expertise (am doing a PhD in contemporary interactive performance) to fill in some gaps. Will make sure to sign my edits etc. Lots to remember! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IcarusGrrl (talk • contribs) 21:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the message as future users of that IP address may see and believe the message/warning is for them. This helps prevent irrelevant warnings from being seen by future users of that shared IP. Second, I moved the message to the archive box. SwisterTwistertalk04:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is my understanding that, aside from a few editing features, IP editors have the same rights as registered editors; this would include other editors not editing or deleting an IP's comments, including on their own talk page. As I dislike the idea of having my talk page arbitrarily archived, please point me to the policy or guideline you are using to justify erasing IP talk pages, that I may read it/them and decide in what fashion I wish to continue editing. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 12:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See this guideline. I believe the "you should never remove another user's talkpage content" applies to registered user talk pages.
As you can see, I will archive warnings using {{Old IP warnings top}} and {{Old IP warnings bottom}}. However, when there are only one or two warnings, I'll simply blank the page and tag the article {{OW}}. Warnings may be removed if the IP user has seen the warning(s). There are also bots that archive old IP warnings (User:SharedIPArchiveBot). SwisterTwistertalk18:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Help
On 14 April you fixed the deleted info about Salman bin Abdulaziz. But it was deleted again. And today a user Alsaudfamily deleted some sourced info about Nayef bin Abdulaziz page regardin his family. So, what can I do now, since this info should not be deleted, I think? Thanks. Egeymi (talk) 17:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your welcome message. I've just created my first page in the en.wikipedia (Rome Urbe Airport), but i've created several pages for the italian Wiki, so i think (hope) i won't create too many problems to you here ;-)Willyminor (talk) 20:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Point of view...
Thanks for reverting my group back to the original setting. Smart E's is on a redirect to one of the members, and does not explain about the group as a whole. As per usual it talks about one person. This is also factually incorrect.
Please return the text. I am one of the members of the group. Infact a founding member who would just like friends to see clear facts not a one sided view — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ortontom222 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uchunari coffee
Dear SwisterTwister,
The "Uchunari coffee" page, I created is a hell..... I have a message now of "copyright". It's true we take information from OUR OWN brochure about the Uchunari coffee, and since the brochure is our own work we can't talk about violation of copyright.
How can I remove it ? I really need your help other way, I am afraid they will delete the page !
An article that you have been involved in editing has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I changed your contribution because it was unsourced and non-notable, the case would've perhaps been notalbe if there had been news coverage. Typically, serious cases are submitted such as school shootings, arson, etc. For future use, see Wikipedia:Citing sources to learn how to cite sources. SwisterTwistertalk21:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
May you please put a reference on the Bucky Roberts page. I have been attempting this for 1 hour and 30 minutes now. I don't want this page deleted for Bucky Roberts is my role model.
Hi SwisterTwister - I'd like to say thank you for the welcome to Wikipedia. I have been bugged mercilessly by my friend Thor, (BarkingFish) and just popped into see what all the buzz was. I'm glad I did too. It's a nice place to work, your users are friendly from what I can tell, and I honestly think I'm gonna like it here. Thank you again. MarkBurberry32 (talk) 01:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. I was looking at using Twinkle for doing the CSD tags, but unfortunately, not being Autoconfirmed, it doesn't work for me. It's a shame, because I know that Twinkle does both together - place the tag and warn the user. Is there any other way I can do that? Doing it manually is fine, don't get me wrong, it's just a bit faster with something to help. I'm off to bed now as it's very late in the UK, so I'll catch any reply from you later today. MarkBurberry32 (talk) 01:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re: In response to your feedback
Indeed it contains foreign language. ClueBot is nothing but a 'BOT' ultimately. What I can say in support to the 'popularity' claim is I, myself. I have seen that movie a lot of times. Besides, if you always ask for written proofs, then I'm sorry! I still think contributing on Wikipedia sucks! I am damn sure you are not Indian, otherwise, you wouldn't have to ask me proof in support of that 'popularity' claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orioncaspar (talk • contribs) 11:36, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Sholay
Ok, here I found some authentic resources in support of the 'Popular Dialogues' of Sholay. Here you go:
I hope these three references are enough. By the way, I wouldn't recommend the reference of IMDB as there are no original dialogues available, all are translated. Other two references are very much authentic. Let me know your reply.
Hi there, thanks for the welcome to wikipedia.
I need a bit of help with something... I plan on taking over the username "BFishY" since it appears that person has no edits or any activity (as far as a noob like me can tell), do you know anything about the process? I read I have to be active for a few months before I can request the takeover. I know it's silly but I NEED that username... haha.
Hi
A new user called "Djm5451" keeps making unusual edits about the social psychology of three films so far under their respective external links section with the latest being Remember the Titans and I'm not too sure what to do.
Should I undo them and tell the editor why or format them for the article?
Dear SwisterTwister. Thank you very much for your kind suggestions and advice. I will check the page and will continue editing the Wikipedia pages.
Best regards. MOGURA (talk) 20:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the instruction on signing posts. I created a page "Proper manors" that needs to be deleted. I accidentally created it with out the "M" in "Manors" capitalized.I've since moved all of the content on that page to a construction page for "Proper Manors". Thanks for your help!
We are updating a bunch of our bio's into Wikipedia, and want them accurate. Can you let us know if we did this correctly and it will be considered permanent and correctly cited?
Hey now Twister. Thank you for finding the article and noting the lack of a lede. See article talkpage for my response. Haven't got around to it; working on other Wiki articles. I'm new at this, but learning. After I've inserted a lede and newfound direct cites can the article be assessed to Start by editors? Again, thanks and right on!!--Weathervane13 (talk) 21:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You removed PokerPlayer1973's removal of content here, I believe the user was removing unnecessary information from the article. As you can see, the article seems to be advertising and contains unnecessary information such as "history of sunglasses" and "safety". SwisterTwistertalk18:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely spotted - on first glance it looked as if the editor was removing a whole bunch of useful content, but it seems that all of it was unrelated to the article. I've deleted the page itself as (very clear) copyright violation of multiple sources. Of the 4 segments i Googled all 4 proved to be a straight copy-and-paste from various other sites. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs)18:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. He is really busy. Already 4 editors has asked him for that. You can also count on me if wish to. All the best for your RfA :) Yasht10104:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I want the image formatted to the infobox. Usually, I'll be able to fix these situations myself, but I can't seem to format it correctly. I've attempted removing the "[[File:]]" and moving the caption to a separate caption section, but it'll show the image as "File:Atsushi Shimono.jpg". SwisterTwistertalk22:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
According to the template documentation at {{Infobox football biography}}, you must use the normal image syntax: Use the full image syntax, including the [[File:]] markup, a size, and alt text. Do not use the "thumb" or "frame" attributes.
OK ... it looks like what you want (I removed the month and day from the caption because, frankly, those aren't important in the long run). If this is how you're planning to do future such images, hope it helped you learn. Daniel Case (talk) 23:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your help, I'm not a frequent user of football bio templates. I assumed the photo would appear without the "File:" as usual in other cases. SwisterTwistertalk02:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of the translators User:Ildiko Santana helping with the project here [13] thus much of their work will not be on English Wikipedia. We however within medical publishing believe in transparency. And there is no requirement on Wikipedia to maintain anonymity. They are not marketing there services but volunteering just like most of the rest of us. Many thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Heyy, I've heard your kind of the master of Wikipedia, and I have some unanswered questions I wonder you can answer. So first off, how do you change the picture in the infobox? I put in a picture of something in an article i'm creating and I have a updated version of the same picture. How can you replace it? please respond on my talk page please! Thank you lots-- Grasch2014 (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is the article. I have a updated image... but i don't understand how to put that image in. Like when you commented on my talk page, you said: "If there is an existing image, you can simply replace that image with the new photo". But what I do not understand is how to replace it. like, do you type in the link, or what about if you drove by it today and took a picture of it and you would like to insert it. Sorry if I'm being a bother, I'm just trying to learn the tricks of Wikipedia. ;) Thank you always--- Grasch2014 (talk) 23:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You recently reinforced the rejection of my page, a rejection that still doesn't make sense. The page Trauma Plate, isn't a page, but a redirection to the page ceramic plate. A ceramic plate can be a TYPE of trauma plate or a ballistic panel. All of this is explained in the page that I created but continues to be ignored. The redirect that exists is extremely miss-informative and needs to be repaired. Making my submission the page for Trauma Plate, while leaving the ceramic plate page as the link referenced in my page should solve the issues that exist. I don't understand why this is so difficult. Mtotin (talk) 18:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Swister, thanks for the heads up! I think you accidentally left two copies of the same message on my talk page but no problems on my end! Cheers, DrPhen (talk) 04:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou Swister. . .for your para-mentoring. I appreciate. I'd need you to help an article not to be deleted. The article is Pre-Colonial Socio-Political History of Kokori Inland by a new wikipedian(gallwey).
Ogagadavid (talk) 06:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Did I correct the errors properly?
Dear SwisterTwister,
Thank you for your response. I'm new to wiki and I've been trying to get the formatting correct after I read all the information but I'm still a little confused. Did I fix this page correctly? I added internal and external links and a category. It is showing up as 2 different pages- one spelled like "Mary alexandra stiefvater" with read delation errors and one like "Mary Alexandra Stiefvater" with a dead end sign in yellow- did I edit it properly? I have to say I have a new found respect for wiki editors- this is hard, but I will read wiki a little better know that I understand how the information is laid out and cited. Thanks for any help you can provide.
-Thunderroad10
(Thunderroad10 (talk) 21:11, 11 May 2012 (UTC))[reply]
"Put Your Hearts Up" (Ariana Grande song)
I have been trying countless hours to try and create a page for Ariana Grande's debut single "Put Your Hearts Up". I have done the best I can on my own. I have it created in my sandbox, but I have no clue how to get it to become a page, I have a little information that I have put in it. I'm not sure if you can view it, but if you can, go to Rlg000raz's sandbox. Thank you, and please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlg000raz (talk • contribs) 02:26, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nicolaus Copernicus was born in the province of Royal Prussia, in the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland. He was an ethnic German who was a subject of the Polish crown.[14] --IIIraute (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your kind words and encouragement. I’m pleased for the basic things you taught me. My first article was deleted on the very first day of its creation because I could not stand by the policies and guidelines strictly. I worked hard in collecting references and other evidences for the article entitled “Dinesh Kumar Mani”. I studied seventeen newspapers’ reports on him out of which nine I’ve quoted as inline citations. I also quoted pages from his book as references but mistakenly used some of the sentences from his website.
Initially I was upset but after reading ur referred articles I got inspired to write the article again without breaking any policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. In this regard, I need ur cooperation and believe that you always motivate beginners like me.
Maharathi (talk) 10:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear sir
Actually I have recently uploaded an article about the Milang sub-Tribe within the Adi Tribe.I would like to directly link Milang tribe to Wikipedia instead of acessing through Adi tribe.
Hi there. Thank you very much for viewing my created articles. Could you please help me by renaming the article "Dalit saints of Hinduism" into "Hindu Dalit sants" so that they be in consistency with the other caste-saint-related articles? Thanks again. - Crimson Zoom —Preceding undated comment added 05:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for re-reviewing Draft:Busby Productions. I took my steer from Hat Trick Productions, a production company Busby have frequently partnered with. I'm a little unsure about where we fall short compared to their article. Could you help, please? I appreciate "additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall" is required. But looking at Hat Trick, would like to know where exactly we'd have to top up. Thanks so much. natz 11:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadworks (talk • contribs)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James J. Riley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PapaMichael (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]