Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 6: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 59: Line 59:
* {{Tfd links|Boomerang original programming}}
* {{Tfd links|Boomerang original programming}}
It's unnecessary to have two templates now, just Boomerang is fine. –[[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46|talk]]) 17:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
It's unnecessary to have two templates now, just Boomerang is fine. –[[User:MegaSmike46|MegaSmike46]] ([[User talk:MegaSmike46|talk]]) 17:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' per nomination. --[[User:WikiCleanerMan|WikiCleanerMan]] ([[User talk:WikiCleanerMan|talk]]) 17:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
<del>*'''Merge''' per nomination. --[[User:WikiCleanerMan|WikiCleanerMan]] ([[User talk:WikiCleanerMan|talk]]) 17:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)</del>
*'''Keep''' Striking my merge vote above. The nominator has been blocked for disruptive editing on television-related pages here. Blocked indefinitely for failing to engage with other editors over concerns about their editing. No need to merge after taking a second look at both templates. Both have different goals in terms of navigation. --[[User:WikiCleanerMan|WikiCleanerMan]] ([[User talk:WikiCleanerMan|talk]]) 01:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


==== [[Template:LCR color]] ====
==== [[Template:LCR color]] ====

Revision as of 01:10, 14 October 2022

< October 5 October 7 >

October 6

Template:Iht header

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Module:Sports table/WL OT. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Orli Znojmo roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Substitute and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kontinental Hockey League divisions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Kontinental Hockey League}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boomerang original programming

It's unnecessary to have two templates now, just Boomerang is fine. –MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC) *Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Striking my merge vote above. The nominator has been blocked for disruptive editing on television-related pages here. Blocked indefinitely for failing to engage with other editors over concerns about their editing. No need to merge after taking a second look at both templates. Both have different goals in terms of navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LCR color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Elizabeth Line Frietjes (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EESL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Winners-2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because I changed my mind. -St3095 (?) 17:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cross-country skiing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bibleverse

Propose merging Template:Bibleverse, Template:Bibleverse-lb, Template:Bibleverse-nb, Template:Biblesource, Template:Bibleref2, Template:Bibleref2-nb, Template:Bibleref2c and Template:Bibleref2c-nb.
Silly quantity of templates that all provide external links to Bible chapters and verses, but vary ever so slightly on capabilities: one prioritises links to biblegateway.com (unnecessary, seeing as you can already choose translation – there's nothing unique it offers iirc); others create little inline superscript text; some provide wikilinks to the books referenced; and so on.

These templates don't accurately describe their differences in capability in their naming – "ref2" is a holdover from when {{Bibleref}} wasn't a redirect to {{Bibleverse}}. Moreover, there's no need for all of these differing capabilities to be separate templates – {{Bibleverse}} is the most descriptive in its name, and the only one I'd say is needed, if all other capabilities were rolled into it.—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 17:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yertis Pavlodar roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template. Substitute and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Over-coverage

Propose merging Template:Over-coverage with Template:Globalize.
These seem to say the same thing. Simplifying the choice of templates for such purposes makes life easier for editors and reduces the maintenance overhead. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_6&oldid=1115949420"