::::It's a shame, because translation is difficult work, and this is basically flawless in that regard. [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]] ([[User talk:Actualcpscm|talk]]) 17:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
::::It's a shame, because translation is difficult work, and this is basically flawless in that regard. [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]] ([[User talk:Actualcpscm|talk]]) 17:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::Thank you. [[User:Bedshote|Bedshote]] ([[User talk:Bedshote#top|talk]]) 17:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::Thank you. [[User:Bedshote|Bedshote]] ([[User talk:Bedshote#top|talk]]) 17:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
==Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!==
[[File:TWA guide left bottom.png |left|link=]]
:::::'''Hi Bedshote!''' We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
::::::* [[WP:TWA/Portal|The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page]]
::::::* [[WP:TWA/Lounge|The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge]]
::::::* [[WP:Teahouse|The Teahouse new editor help space]]
Ok, I was going to write a comment about how you have no independent sources blah blah blah, if you want it deleted tag it with CSD#G7, the speedy deletion criterion for author request. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 22:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
June 2023
Hi Bedshote! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of KVII-TV several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
I apologize for this, I thought it was vandalism due to the large deletion of material. I was using a filter for unregistered and newcomer users, so I believed it was reasonable to suspect vandalism. I hope you can forgive me, I mean good faith. It has been my first time using Twinkle. Bedshote (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Euplokamis evansae, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
I highly recommend you review WP:What Wikipedia is not, because this is a huge WP:NOTGUIDE violation on top of being unsourced. You did some copyediting on this article (I assume you saw it on an anti-vandalism filter), so just making sure you understand what is and is not acceptable on a Wikipedia article, especially since you are interested in combating vandalism. I left this message because I think you are qualified to manage this article and its quality, but since you missed several problematic edits, wanted to let you know. --(Roundish⋆t)20:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to know more, I personally started off at the WP:WikiFauna#See Also chart and looked at the various links within. They are fairly entertaining and are surprisingly informative on the various tasks around Wikipedia. I still like to spend an hour or so getting lost in policy rabbitholes. (Roundish⋆t)23:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I have done that, and now I have a question: In the vandalism warning templates, do the different templates for vandalism like template 3, mean a worse vandalization was committed or just repeated vandalism? Bedshote (talk) 00:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Euplokamis octoptera, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on S Ori 52 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S ori 52. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Actualcpscm (talk) 16:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The point of that CSD criterion is not so much the source of the copying and more so that it was previously determined that the subject does not warrant a standalone article. Barring substantial changes to either the nature of the subject or its presentation in the article, the previous AfD applies to the current article; at least, that's the rationale behind CSD G4, as far as I know. Although I cannot see the deleted article, the discussion in the AfD discussion seems quite pertinent to the article in its current state. Actualcpscm (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
