User talk:TheWikiWiki: Difference between revisions
Shutterbug (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
"TheWikiWiki" seems to be a [[WP:SPA]] and thus "good faith" can be excluded. [[User:COFS|COFS]] 02:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |
"TheWikiWiki" seems to be a [[WP:SPA]] and thus "good faith" can be excluded. [[User:COFS|COFS]] 02:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
*Your assumptions notwithstanding, unless you have some evidence of this, that is not correct. Interestingly enough, the accuser is also an [[WP:SPA]] in this case, and a confirmed meatpuppet. [[User:Smee|Smee]] 02:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC). |
Revision as of 02:28, 9 June 2007
Welcome!
|
-- I saw that you were never "welcomed", so Welcome to the project! Yours, Smee 05:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC).
Comment from User:COFS
Hi. I saw that your "first edit ever" was to delete sourced reference material in the Ron DeWolf article. Please familiarize with Wikipedia policy (type WP:POL or WP:VAN in the search box) before removing content, thanks. COFS 04:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
2nd Warning
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Ron DeWolf. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.
If you are running a WP:SPA you also should read WP:SOCK. If not, do not. COFS 16:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- These warnings are inappropriate. The user "TheWikiWiki" is clearly using detailed edit summaries to explain him/herself, and these are good faith edits, and not vandalism. Smee 21:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC).
"TheWikiWiki" seems to be a WP:SPA and thus "good faith" can be excluded. COFS 02:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Your assumptions notwithstanding, unless you have some evidence of this, that is not correct. Interestingly enough, the accuser is also an WP:SPA in this case, and a confirmed meatpuppet. Smee 02:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC).