User talk:Porchcorpter

WARNING: If you want to add ANY comments, refer to User:Porchcrop/Instructions for contacting or your comments will be ignored and deleted.

Your NPWatcher application

Dear Porchcrop,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join #wikimedia-npw.

Protonk (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Porchcropbot

I've just closed Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Porchcropbot. Please see the request page for details. Thanks - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maximum Boy

A tag has been placed on Maximum Boy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Staxringold _talk^contribs 04:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

How is it non-notable, please see the talk page. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 04:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Editors who are not getting feedback from their good edits

I have nominated Category:Editors who are not getting feedback from their good edits (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 05:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Unappreciated

Template:Unappreciated has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for deletion page. Thank you. Crafty (talk) 08:30, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Good work

		The Original Barnstar
		I hereby award this barnstar to Porchcrop for his valuable anti vandalism work , and for creating some useful articles. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

I saw you on Request for Admins and checked out some of your work. You do some good stuff, but I dont think you quite have enough experience yet so didnt support. They can be a little mean round here so I dont know if Id advise spending too much time trying to get your edit count up just to be an admin. Maybe just edit every now and then, and try again in about a years time. Dont be discouraged , there are lots of folk who even have degrees and many years experience in serious jobs that fail RFAs. With time and experience you're be able to pass RfA if you want to. I also had a look at your Maximun Boy article and added a few references for you, have a look at the changes I made, you always need to add a couple of references to make an article safe from deletion. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the shiny shiny barnstar. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 23:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Porch, I just want to echo the sentiments Feyd has made here. You need to think about what you want to do around here, not necessarily what you would like to be. Your record shows that you have much to offer. Don't worry about things like Adminship for now. Focus on doing constructive things that you enjoy with the tools you already have at your disposal. Regards, Crafty (talk) 23:06, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, Crafty. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 23:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem, kid. ;) Crafty (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I'm not a kid by the way. I'm a teenager. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 23:12, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Oops! Sorry about that. I'll be more careful in the future. Take care, Crafty (talk) 23:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Your RfA

Porchcrop - sorry to inform you, but I've closed your recent RfA early per WP:SNOW, as it was clearly not succeeding at this time. Please don't be discouraged, though. Take the advice that others have given you and try reapplying after you've gained a more thorough knowledge of policies, and more all-around experience. :) Best of luck with everything, JamieS93 17:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. Thanks to everybody who were noting about the facts of me. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 23:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

01C

Thank'ee much for joining! Your request has been approved and you are now a proud member of Wikipedia's only counter-vandalism cabal! Want a userbox to go along with it? (Also, we've got an InvisionFree board; check the cabal page.) 21655 ^{ταλκ/01ҁ} 13:36, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you 21655. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 00:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Edit reversions

Errr, what was all that? Staxringold _talk^contribs 01:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

It was a mistake. :) -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 01:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Josef Rudolf Zavrtal

Josef Rudolf Zavrtal has entries in almost all major music encyclopedias. How is he not notable? Please explain. -Voodoobug