Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoinDCX

CoinDCX

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete promotional article that is trying to hinge on routine announcements around funding or campaigns or brand ambassadors. There is no WP:CORPDEPTH. Scroll article has some merit but most of it is interviewish. If it was a biography, it could have helped but for companies, WP:CORPDEPTH requires actual independent analysis, discussion and commentary about the company and not just telling what is already known or said or coming from the company. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now ,The company is notable and frequently mentioned in news and media. But the article is written like a promotion, with giving more imprtance to their achievements rather than what an encyclopaedia required. A copyediting by an experienced editor should solve the problem. 007sak (talk) 06:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Notability is not temporary. Keep'For now' or 'For later' has no meaning I feel. Delete 'for now' might have sense since non-notable topics can become notable in future. But it's rare for notable topics to become non-notable unless there are policy change. Frequently mentioned in news and media is not one of the notability criteria. What we need is WP:CORPDEPTH in WP:RS written in a way that's WP:IS. That's not being met here. If others feel differently, please provide examples of how it is being met. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The company is the first and most popular unicorn cryptocurrency company registered in India valued at over a billion dollars. Daily coverage in mainline news media as well as other channels. Definitely notable enough and lots of quality sources available online from mainline news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:613C:AB76:5D0E:D8E:CCCE:C14E (talk) 14:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC) Keep comment is by an anonymous IP address. Likely COI case is an indication is such activities happen Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment Added some reliable references to the article. 007sak (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not with WP:RS but with WP:CORPDEPTH. Will be helpful to have at least three examples that give definitive clarity that they qualify WP:CORPDEPTH. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Description about company and their services in Forbes [1], Bloomberg [2], The Hindu [3], Quartz [4], The Times of India [5], Mint [6], Indian Express [7]

Also have trivial mentions in international news publications including Reuters [8] and The Washington Post [9][10] 007sak (talk) 12:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]