User talk:JJonahJackalope

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJonahJackalope.

This is JJonahJackalope's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Your GA nomination of 1914–1915 Fulton Bag and Cotton Mills strike

The article 1914–1915 Fulton Bag and Cotton Mills strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1914–1915 Fulton Bag and Cotton Mills strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 19:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign

The article Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign

The article Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1913 Studebaker strike

On 6 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1913 Studebaker strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1913 Studebaker strike is regarded as the first major labor strike in the automotive industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1913 Studebaker strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1913 Studebaker strike), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Hog Farm _Talk 04:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Deere strike

Great work on the article about the John Deere strike! — Mainly 15:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Go North West strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Go North West strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Go North West strike

The article 2021 Go North West strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2021 Go North West strike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Go North West strike

The article 2021 Go North West strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Go North West strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate your eye on my work

I have currently worked to develop Draft:1986-7 John Deere-UAW labor dispute detailing the 1986 strike which predates this current one. However, I am a UAW member who is part of the group in the 2021 strike. Obviously I have a COI, so I avoided the current one. I have disclosed the COI and would appreciate your examination of the draft page before I submit it due to your work both in organized labor and the current Deere strike. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 00:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gwennie-nyan Thanks for reaching out! I actually came across some info on the 1986 strike while I made the article on the 2021 one and had planned on writing about the 1986 strike at some point, but it seems you beat me to it lol. But yeah, I'd be more than happy to look over your draft! I'm a bit busy tonight, but I can have it read and give you some feedback tomorrow if that works for you. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll be around midday tomorrow. I'm on the picket line late into the night otherwise. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 01:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gwennie-nyan Hey, so I went ahead and read over it and have a couple of comments about the draft. This is by no means exhaustive and the AfC reviewers might have their own comments, but just from what I saw here it goes:

First of all, Earwig checks out, no real indication of any copyright violation or plagiarism, which is good.
Per MOS:DATERANGE, I'd change 1986-7 to 1986–1987, also using an en dash instead of a hyphen.
I'd make some note near the beginning of the article that Deere & Company does business as John Deere. It may be obvious, but it's never really expressly stated in the article.
Per MOS:DIGITS, I would change some of the 4-digit numbers so that either all of them contain commas (eg, 4,000) or none of them contain commas (eg, 3000), as the article right now uses both formats
"On Monday, August 25, Deere & Company, stopped production", I'd remove the comma after Company in this sentence.
Per MOS:ALLCAPS, I'd edit the titles of the references.
Additionally with regards to the sources, it's good practice to archive them.
Per MOS:SEASONS, I'd recommend choosing other heading titles that don't include the seasons.
In the section titled "Late Summer 1986", a sentence mentions some Ottumwa workers who had been on a "summer shutdown", if possible maybe include some additional information for this, like if it was related to this other labor dispute.
In the section titled "Early Winter 1986", the paragraph starting with "On December 10, Deere's fiscal year" is repeated.
Also with that paragraph, I'm not sure if having "(see § Late Summer 1986, above)" is all that necessary, as the article as a whole is not that long.
Per MOS:PERCENT, I'd change all instances of "%" to "percent".
In the section titled "Late Winter 1987 and strike end", I'd remove the "≈" sign from "approximately ≈9250 active UAW members", as having "approximately" there makes that symbol a bit redundant.
In the section titled "August partial strike and subsequent lockout", it may be good to explain the distinction between laid-off and active employees. Are they retirees? Were they recently fired? It might be better to say that those 22,000 were represented by the UAW contract than that they were part of the workforce.
In the section titled "Late Summer 1986", did the unemployment office offer any rationale for their decision in denying their claims? Any statement given?
In that same section, where is WQAD-TV located?

In addition to these comments, I can say that after first reading I didn't notice anything substantial that would make me question the POV, it seems that the information presented is well-cited and I didn't notice any real bias. I hope these comments help, I wish you good luck with the AfC process, and I thank you for contributing to WP:LABOR. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 01:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have resolved all easily-resolvable issues. The page can now be found at Draft:1986–1987 John Deere-UAW labor dispute.

Regarding the Ottumwa workers, I found no other information. However it does not seem that the shutdown is related to the dispute. However that would need to be cited.
Regarding the unemployment decision, no statement was made. The sources just said the lot were denied along the lines of the company's argument.

I appreciate your quick review and assistance in this matter!

Thank you ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 02:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1913 Studebaker strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1913 Studebaker strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1913 Studebaker strike

The article 1913 Studebaker strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1913 Studebaker strike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1913 Studebaker strike

The article 1913 Studebaker strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1913 Studebaker strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pamzeis has left you a message on their talk page

Hello, JJonahJackalope. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/The Devil and Daniel Webster (opera).
Message added 01:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Pamzeis (talk) 01:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strike fatality

Sadly it seems the 2021 John Deere strike has claimed its first fatality. https://www.ourquadcities.com/news/local-news/roadside-fatality-involving-uaw-protestor/ ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 14:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign

On 28 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Dan Quayle announced his 2000 presidential campaign, Larry King congratulated him by telling him "you're not a joke like you once were"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dan Quayle 2000 presidential campaign), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Israel Putnam Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Israel Putnam Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Equestrian statue of Ambrose Burnside

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Equestrian statue of Ambrose Burnside you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Israel Putnam Monument

The article Israel Putnam Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Israel Putnam Monument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Equestrian statue of Ambrose Burnside

The article Equestrian statue of Ambrose Burnside you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Equestrian statue of Ambrose Burnside for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Israel Putnam Monument

On 16 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Israel Putnam Monument, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Connecticut, there are statues of Revolutionary War hero Israel Putnam in Brooklyn, in Hartford, and in Redding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Israel Putnam Monument, Statue of Israel Putnam, Equestrian statue of Israel Putnam. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Israel Putnam Monument), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Statue of Israel Putnam

On 16 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Statue of Israel Putnam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Connecticut, there are statues of Revolutionary War hero Israel Putnam in Brooklyn, in Hartford, and in Redding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Israel Putnam Monument, Statue of Israel Putnam, Equestrian statue of Israel Putnam. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Statue of Israel Putnam), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Equestrian statue of Israel Putnam

On 16 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Equestrian statue of Israel Putnam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Connecticut, there are statues of Revolutionary War hero Israel Putnam in Brooklyn, in Hartford, and in Redding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Israel Putnam Monument, Statue of Israel Putnam, Equestrian statue of Israel Putnam. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Equestrian statue of Israel Putnam), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Jim Beam strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2016 Jim Beam strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 23:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Self-Destruction of the Ultimate Warrior, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal Wrestling Federation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Jim Beam strike

The article 2016 Jim Beam strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 Jim Beam strike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mountain Dew goat commercials

On 21 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mountain Dew goat commercials, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an advertisement for Mountain Dew starring Tyler, the Creator as a talking goat was criticized by social commentator Boyce Watkins as "arguably the most racist commercial in history"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mountain Dew goat commercials. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mountain Dew goat commercials), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,639 views (1,386.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion

Hello! Your submission of 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Eewilson (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2016 Jim Beam strike

The article 2016 Jim Beam strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2016 Jim Beam strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 15:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 02:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Statue of Israel Putnam

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Statue of Israel Putnam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1979 Boston University strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1979 Boston University strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ExcellentWheatFarmer -- ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1979 Boston University strike

The article 1979 Boston University strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1979 Boston University strike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ExcellentWheatFarmer -- ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1979 Boston University strike

The article 1979 Boston University strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1979 Boston University strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ExcellentWheatFarmer -- ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion

The article 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion

The article 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Statue of Israel Putnam

The article Statue of Israel Putnam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Statue of Israel Putnam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Virginia Volvo Trucks strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Virginia Volvo Trucks strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2016 Jim Beam strike

On 12 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2016 Jim Beam strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2016 Jim Beam strike was the first labor strike in the company's history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Jim Beam strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2016 Jim Beam strike), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion

On 12 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1963 gas explosion in Indianapolis during a Holiday on Ice show was one of the worst disasters in Indiana history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Amazon Venture oil spill

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amazon Venture oil spill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Amazon Venture oil spill

The article Amazon Venture oil spill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Amazon Venture oil spill for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Amazon Venture oil spill

The article Amazon Venture oil spill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amazon Venture oil spill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1979 Boston University strike

On 16 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1979 Boston University strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1979 Boston University strike, some striking professors carried picket signs with quotes from Paul the Apostle, William Shakespeare, and Voltaire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1979 Boston University strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1979 Boston University strike), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chapter Thirteen: The Sweet Hereafter

On 19 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chapter Thirteen: The Sweet Hereafter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the season-one finale of Riverdale, "Chapter Thirteen: The Sweet Hereafter", almost included Sabrina Spellman from Chilling Adventures of Sabrina? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chapter Thirteen: The Sweet Hereafter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chapter Thirteen: The Sweet Hereafter), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Virginia Volvo Trucks strike

The article 2021 Virginia Volvo Trucks strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Virginia Volvo Trucks strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 02:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1990 ARCO explosion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1990 ARCO explosion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1990 ARCO explosion

The article 1990 ARCO explosion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1990 ARCO explosion for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1990 ARCO explosion

The article 1990 ARCO explosion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1990 ARCO explosion for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amazon Venture oil spill

On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amazon Venture oil spill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Amazon Venture oil spill, in which about 500,000 US gallons (1,900,000 litres) of oil spilled into the Savannah River, was caused by three valves that simultaneously malfunctioned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amazon Venture oil spill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amazon Venture oil spill), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arco Chemical Channelview, Texas explosion

Is there another source for the $100MM of damages associated with the 1990 explosion at Arco Chemical's Channelview, Texas plant? I was considering marking it as dubious. The amount seems high, is somewhat suspiciously a nice round number, and was obtained from an article written by a Houston Chronicle freelancer. Sandcherry (talk) 00:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I cited the additional source and linked it in my comment on your talk page here ("The explosion killed 17 people, and damages were estimated to be $100 million.") -JJonahJackalope (talk) 16:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article states ARCO (actually Arco Chemical or ACC) spent $36MM for repairs, upgrades and safety system improvements, and the total damage estimate was $100MM. Therefore, it follows that about $64MM was spent to repair damages outside the Channelview plant. This seems implausible as no damages external to the plant are mentioned in the article. It also seems the damage estimate was high ($100MM vs the $16MM ACC spent excluding the safety system improvements) and used by the Chronicle freelance reporter as the actual cost. Unless a source can be found to substantiate the actual cost, I suggest deleting the estimate or rewording the article to state the actual costs incurred by ACC were a fraction of the original estimate. Sandcherry (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided two reliable sources (one university-level textbook and one mainstream newspaper) that both state that the estimated damages from the explosion were approximately $100 million. I see no reason to not include the information provided by these sources. To the best of my abilities, I also included all other information provided by other reliable sources documenting the costs from the explosion. I do not know the process by which these sources determined the $100 million value, but unless you can provide reliable sources that contradict these values, I would advocate for leaving them in the article. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the only source for the actual damages is Arco Chemical, I will revise the article keeping the $100MM estimate as you suggest and noting ACC only spent $36MM. If a source can be found to substantiate additional damages external to the plant, the details and costs can be added later. Sandcherry (talk) 22:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1990 ARCO explosion

On 3 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1990 ARCO explosion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two major petrochemical explosions in the Greater Houston area, the 1990 ARCO explosion and the Phillips disaster, occurred within one year of each other? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1990 ARCO explosion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1990 ARCO explosion), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1985–1987 Watsonville Cannery strike

On 23 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1985–1987 Watsonville Cannery strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that of the more than 1,000 workers who participated in the 18-month long 1985–1987 Watsonville Cannery strike, none of them crossed the picket line? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1985–1987 Watsonville Cannery strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1985–1987 Watsonville Cannery strike), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1966 Dayton race riot

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1966 Dayton race riot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1966 Dayton race riot

The article 1966 Dayton race riot you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1966 Dayton race riot for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1966 Dayton race riot

The article 1966 Dayton race riot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1966 Dayton race riot for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fun Lounge police raid

On 13 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fun Lounge police raid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following a 1964 police raid on a gay bar, Chicago newspapers published the names and personal information of several of those arrested? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fun Lounge police raid. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fun Lounge police raid), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,929 views (577.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fun Lounge police raid

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fun Lounge police raid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErrantX -- ErrantX (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies; I forgot to put this on hold the other day Errant ^(chat!) 09:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fun Lounge police raid

The article Fun Lounge police raid you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fun Lounge police raid for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErrantX -- ErrantX (talk) 10:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Oregon Tech strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Oregon Tech strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 07:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Oregon Tech strike

The article 2021 Oregon Tech strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2021 Oregon Tech strike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Oregon Tech strike

The article 2021 Oregon Tech strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Oregon Tech strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fun Lounge police raid

The article Fun Lounge police raid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fun Lounge police raid for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErrantX -- ErrantX (talk) 06:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Georgia Baptist College

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Georgia Baptist College you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Georgia Baptist College

The article Georgia Baptist College you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Georgia Baptist College for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Georgia Baptist College

The article Georgia Baptist College you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Georgia Baptist College for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Castro Sweep entry

Thanks for posting the entry on the Castro Sweep. Note that a better source or an additional source beyond my 1989 OutLook article is my chapter from the 2002 anthology "Out in the Castro." This updates, revises and much expands on the material from the OutLook article:

https://www.academia.edu/29279617/Remembering_a_Police_Riot_The_Castro_Sweep_of_October_6_1989

Given Wikipedia editing rules, I can't cite my own chapter in making revisions to the entry, but thought you might want to. Notably, for instance, the assertion from Leighton and Brown about the sweep being revenge by the SFPD for having been chased out of the Castro during the Terry Sutton political funeral in fact is a point they cite from my chapter.

Keep up the great work!

—Gerard Koskovich

Your GA nomination of Great Mill Disaster

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Great Mill Disaster you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Great Mill Disaster

The article Great Mill Disaster you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Great Mill Disaster for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 06:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Great Mill Disaster

The article Great Mill Disaster you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Great Mill Disaster for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Georgia Baptist College

On 25 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Georgia Baptist College, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Central City College was established as an African American-led alternative to the historically black Atlanta Baptist College? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Georgia Baptist College. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Georgia Baptist College), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for One Griswold Street

On 25 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article One Griswold Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that One Griswold Street in Detroit, now owned by the Church of Scientology, was built on the location of the first church building in the city, Ste. Anne de Détroit? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/One Griswold Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, One Griswold Street), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:U.S. News & World Report, April 18, 2005.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:U.S. News & World Report, April 18, 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Castro Sweep

On 8 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Castro Sweep, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that about 200 San Francisco police officers led a 1989 riot through a gay neighborhood in reaction to a peaceful protest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Castro Sweep. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Castro Sweep), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,444 views (726.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Bacon related articles

I saw you added your name here which surprised me since I thought that page would be long dormant and so I checked out your user page. Henry Bacon was my great-great(-great?) uncle so I'm always interested in him so I was delighted to see you had created articles for Statue of the Marquis de Lafayette (Lafayette College) and Lafayette Memorial. I just wanted to let you know that articles like that are definitely noticed and appreciated. :) - Aoidh (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign

On 17 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Orrin Hatch's presidential campaign in 2000, his wife told him that his poor performance in the Iowa caucuses was a "sign from God" to end his campaign? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 05:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Donald Trump and American football

On 18 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Donald Trump and American football, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2018, Donald Trump disinvited the Philadelphia Eagles from a Super Bowl LII victory ceremony at the White House after several players said they were not going to attend? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Trump and American football. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Donald Trump and American football), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,164 views (423.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Tiger, February 12, 2015.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:The Tiger, February 12, 2015.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LucasKannou (talk) 03:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game

The article 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see it passed: congrats! But...really? You couldn't pick any of the other games, games that Alabama won? Drmies (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign

The article Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game

The article 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game

On 1 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Alabama Crimson Tide's loss to the LSU Tigers in their 2019 football game broke a 31-game home winning streak? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 LSU vs. Alabama football game), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Castro Sweep

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Castro Sweep you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peachtree Arcade

On 6 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peachtree Arcade, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peachtree Arcade, a shopping arcade in the U.S. state of Georgia, was conceived after a local businessman visited the Cleveland Arcade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peachtree Arcade. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Peachtree Arcade), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anthro New England logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anthro New England logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peachtree Arcade

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peachtree Arcade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peachtree Arcade

The article Peachtree Arcade you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Peachtree Arcade for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Henry Grady Hotel

On 8 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henry Grady Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to Jimmy Carter, "more of [Georgia's] business was probably conducted in the Henry Grady than in the state capitol"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Grady Hotel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Henry Grady Hotel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,151 views (595.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peachtree Arcade

The article Peachtree Arcade you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peachtree Arcade for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

url-status parameter

I've been cleaning up some of the articles listed for maintenance at Category:CS1 maint: url-status. I just did two of your's, 2019 AT&T strike and 1990 ARCO explosion. I just thought you ought to know that the url-status parameter in the citation template is only for use when an archived url is listed. When url-status=live is used without an archived url in a citation the article is listed for maintenance at Category:CS1 maint: url-status. --Bejnar (talk) 05:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Castro Sweep

The article Castro Sweep you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Castro Sweep for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for the immense and impressive work you done to create high quality articles on labor history. I am especially impressed by 1964–1965 Scripto strike. Great job and keep up the important work! User:Namiba 13:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)

On 5 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paramount Theatre (Atlanta), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at the time of its construction in 1920, the Howard Theatre in Atlanta was the second-largest movie theater in the world, with a seating capacity of 2,700? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paramount Theatre (Atlanta). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Indian General Strike and more or less tolerable narratives

Hello there, my honourable colleague. I have the honour to acquaint you with the following: you being an authour of various articles on industrial disputes, including Twenty Twenty Indian General Strike, It is necessary to ask you about the primary and secondary sources, for you are certain to be much more well-versed in the province of various sources than myself. The point is that I have been writing a Russian article on the above-mentioned strike action, but I am just unaware of various sites which furnish a great deal of official reports, various legal documents, more or less tolerable narratives. Writing an article, using dubious newspaper accounts (I am talking about opportunistic and absolutionary Jacobin) is a very, very complicated task, in accordance with my opinion.

I do not know whether you have an opportunity to help me or not, for, in theory, there are no more or less voluminous sources, except a set of newspaper accounts given in the lower part of English article on this strike, although this strike is vitally important for the current development of international labour movement. It is blatantly obvious that the article in English Wikipedia is not very valuable, and its social impact is certain not to be very, very impressive. The situation in Russian Wikipedia is not the same, though, for my attempt to describe and discuss the afore-mentioned strike is certain to be a partial failure.

It is evident that our methods of description are pretty different from one another, but I sincerely hope that your reply will not be a drop of gall, even though, in conformity with the present-day rules of Wikipedia, I am certain to be worthy of the most bilious remarks. Sincerely yours, Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 10:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

On 18 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ponce de Leon Springs in Atlanta was named in reference to the legend of Juan Ponce de León's search for the Fountain of Youth due to the spring water's supposed health benefits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1964–1965 Scripto strike

On 19 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1964–1965 Scripto strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the day after returning to Atlanta following his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance in 1964, Martin Luther King Jr. joined picketers who were on strike against Scripto? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1964–1965 Scripto strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1964–1965 Scripto strike), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

On 21 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2010, the Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in Atlanta became the first church in the state to be elevated to the rank of a minor basilica? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Piedmont Hotel

On 23 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Piedmont Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Piedmont Hotel hosted a former, a current, and a future U.S. president in one week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Piedmont Hotel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Piedmont Hotel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,314 views (442.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Shrine of the Immaculate Conception

On 24 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Church of the Immaculate Conception was rededicated as a shrine in 1954, 100 years after the dogma of the Immaculate Conception was defined? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shrine of the Immaculate Conception), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 22:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

The article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign and Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

The article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign for comments about the article, and Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 22:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

On 14 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tom Harkin ended his 1992 presidential campaign just one month after he won a landslide victory in the Iowa caucuses, where he received over three-quarters of the total vote? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

The article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) and Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 23:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike

On 18 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to The Atlantic, "the first widely acknowledged performance" of the song "We Shall Overcome" occurred during the 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1937 Fleischer Studios strike

On 19 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1937 Fleischer Studios strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1937 Fleischer Studios strike in New York City was the first major labor strike in the animation industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1937 Fleischer Studios strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1937 Fleischer Studios strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Mike Christie, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 22:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

The article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) for comments about the article, and Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 20:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paramount Theatre (Atlanta) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reviews

Hi there. At the moment, you have promoted 46 Good Articles, and reviewed no nominations. Might I request you to occasionally review a couple? It would help keep the backlog down, and your nominations would also be taken up quicker. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request

I would be delighted if you answered some questions in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/WikiProject report on WP:LABOR, given your prolific content contributions on strike actions. Feel free to directly edit/add any questions as you see fit. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

Hello! Your submission of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1987 Forsyth County protests

On 16 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1987 Forsyth County protests, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1987 march attended by about 20,000 protestors in Forsyth County, Georgia, has been called one of the largest civil rights demonstrations since the civil rights movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1987 Forsyth County protests. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1987 Forsyth County protests), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your work creating this article. — AjaxSmack 16:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 14:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)

The article Paramount Theatre (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paramount Theatre (Atlanta) for comments about the article, and Talk:Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shrine of the Immaculate Conception

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shrine of the Immaculate Conception you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 19:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shrine of the Immaculate Conception

The article Shrine of the Immaculate Conception you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shrine of the Immaculate Conception for comments about the article, and Talk:Shrine of the Immaculate Conception/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike

The article 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

On 25 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill was discovered by two teenagers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lady Rainier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lady Rainier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Rainier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- RoySmith (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1834 Philadelphia race riot

On 7 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1834 Philadelphia race riot, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1834 Philadelphia race riot began at a carousel before spreading to other parts of the city? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1834 Philadelphia race riot. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1834 Philadelphia race riot), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,037 views (668.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Rainier at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 04:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1834 Philadelphia race riot

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1834 Philadelphia race riot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Nabisco strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Nabisco strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 2600:100D:B0CA:BC2:3D66:753C:73F8:915B -- 2600:100D:B0CA:BC2:3D66:753C:73F8:915B (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1834 Philadelphia race riot

The article 1834 Philadelphia race riot you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot and Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1834 Philadelphia race riot

The article 1834 Philadelphia race riot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot for comments about the article, and Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lady Rainier

On 22 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lady Rainier, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lady Rainier has been raising a glass since 1903? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Rainier. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lady Rainier), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Apocheir -- Apocheir (talk) 00:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike

The article 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike and Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Apocheir -- Apocheir (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1913 El Paso smelters' strike

On 2 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1913 El Paso smelters' strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1913 El Paso smelters' strike the Industrial Workers of the World and the Western Federation of Miners competed to organize the strikers with their respective labor unions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1913 El Paso smelters' strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1913 El Paso smelters' strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Americus Institute

Hi JJonahJackalope, I added a couple things to end of the Later years section about the school filing for bankruptcy (was researching Draft:Staley High School) but I am not familiar with the citation style you used. I tried my best but will you please double check. Happy to learn! S0091 (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S0091, thank you for your edits, I made some changes to the page to incorporate the works appropriately with the sfn reference style. If you want to learn more about that style of citing references, I'd recommend reading over the Help:Shortened footnotes page. Best of luck on your work on the Staley High School page, and keep up the good work. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike

The article 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Apocheir -- Apocheir (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dyk of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike?

Hello. I just wanted to know, do you ever plan on nominating 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike to DYK? Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Nabisco strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Nabisco strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of HadesTTW -- HadesTTW (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the upload...

A nice thought all around. Nice work. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be fair use at the Jimmy Carter page? I don't know the rules so have no idea. Maybe you can pop it in there as well using a fair use tag. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page title of Statue of Stevens T. Mason

Hey, I stumbled across this article today, and I noticed in particular that the lede never states the title in full while giving the alternative name of Stevens T. Mason Monument. Is either the current article title or alternative name official in any way? I don't really know where to look for info like that. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Time for Kids logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Time for Kids logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Playboy, February 2016.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playboy, February 2016.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've seriously got 51 GAs and zero reviews? Ain't it about time...

You've seriously got 51 GAs and zero reviews? Is that an error of some sort? If not, then ain't it about time you pitched in and shared the load? § Lingzhi (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 16:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DMARGE, December 2019.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DMARGE, December 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

The article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game and Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

The article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game for comments about the article, and Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964–1965 Scripto strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1964–1965 Scripto strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lingzhi.Renascence -- Lingzhi.Renascence (talk) 05:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

The article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) and Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - this took less time than I thought. Have put it on hold and left some comments. Most are minor, it is clearly GA standard. The only one of substance relates to the Architecture, particularly the interior. Take a look and ping me. KJP1 (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

The article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) for comments about the article, and Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 08:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

Hello! Your submission of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

The article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill and Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 06:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

scripts strike, am traveling sorry

am traveling, sorry, will have computer access in maybe 2 days § Lingzhi (talk|check refs) 08:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Penn Memorial Fire Tower

On 24 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Penn Memorial Fire Tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the William Penn Memorial Fire Tower (pictured) overlooking Reading, Pennsylvania, was built during the Great Depression with funding from the Works Progress Administration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Penn Memorial Fire Tower. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Penn Memorial Fire Tower), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964–1965 Scripto strike

The article 1964–1965 Scripto strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike and Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Revolution of the Ganhadores

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Revolution of the Ganhadores you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964–1965 Scripto strike

The article 1964–1965 Scripto strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

The article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill for comments about the article, and Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 21:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Revolution of the Ganhadores

The article Revolution of the Ganhadores you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Revolution of the Ganhadores and Talk:Revolution of the Ganhadores/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 12:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

On 19 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game, known as the "Game of the Century", was the first football game in Texas to be broadcast nationally? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1935 SMU vs. TCU football game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Argosy, September 1953.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Argosy, September 1953.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Fleischer Studios strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1937 Fleischer Studios strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]