Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Drat8sub (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 13 November 2023 (→‎India national football team at the Asian Games: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



September 2023

For a future FAC nomination. Many thanks. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential GAN. Also think the "popular culture" section could use copyediting as well. The Cadillac Ranger (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Wracking talk! 17:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another soccer article that I plan to take to FAC in the future. Might need some trimming and removal of leftover sportswriter terms. SounderBruce 07:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've got this article to GA status, and I'd like to get it to FAC status - so your help or any suggestions would be appreciated! Turini2 (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Golconda diamonds is a former GA, and a GOCE was completed, but unfortunately it was partly done. I intend to nominate the article for FA (FAC). Thus needed a thorough copy editing. :)-Omer123hussain (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Omer123hussain:, this article still has {{Disputed}} at the top, as it did in December '22 when I processed your previous c/e request (which was not "partly done" btw; see my edit summary here). Factual inaccuracies should be dealt with before an FA nomination don't expect the GOCE to fix them up. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Baffle gab1978: thanks for fixing those issues during GOCE,by "partly" I mean that during the GOCE review I could not answer to the issues.
  • Recently I had cleaned, cited and added text to make the article more clear and support the factuality.
  • My expectation from GOCE team is that, you point out the issues i will resolve those. because as an editor it is hard to find issues in our own work, so i came here to ask for the support from GOCE to point out the issues only.
Omer123hussain (talk) 22:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to reply to you on the REQ talk page; please feel free to discuss there. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 19:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of improper format spelling and grammar throughout the article. SKAG123 (talk) 03:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SKAG123, —e: will do later, pausing for now— Remsense 01:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article likely created by a non-English speaker. Possibly a machine translation of a foreign language wiki-page. Needs paragraphs, wiki-links, grammar fixes, etc. Sources and inline citations would be a bonus if the editor is willing. Thanks for the help.4meter4 (talk) 00:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold; this is an unreferenced BLP on a notable musician (see authority control panel there). I've tagged it as such, and there are COI issues as well. Discuss at REQ Talk. Baffle☿gab 19:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a set of paintings and subsequent variations/derivations by Andy Warhol. This is a seminal piece of art. It is one of 17 paintings listed at vital articles level 4 and one of 10 contemporary art paintings listed at vital articles level 5. This was listed at WP:FA from March 26, 2007 to March 7, 2021. It is now a WP:FFA. It just failed at WP:FAC and I was encouraged to nominate it for WP:PR and WP:GOCE. I was the original page creator and GA and FA nominator. I finally have the time and motivation to restore its FA (FAC). I have vigorously expanded the content. I have an outstanding request at WP:MCQ after which I hope to submit this at WP:PR. Recent discussions that are relevant are the Wikipedia:Featured article review/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive1 from March 25, 2021 and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive2 from today. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note the WP:MCQ issues are resolved.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

I would like to request a copy edit of this article in preparation for GAN, and appreciate any guidance or feedback following your copy edit and review. Thank you in advance! — West Virginian (talk) 02:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I finished off this article and possibly looking at a GAN for this article and just need a checkover just before I go and nominate this article. HawkAussie (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page would really benefit from some TLC from the Guide of Copy Editors. The grammar is weak, the hyperlinks are haphazard, it needs to be made more gender neutral ('their' instead of 'his', etc). I also find it quite difficult to edit the article due on mobile to the "glossary" template uses on the page - it would be nice if the article could be made more user-friendly (from the perspective of both the reader and editor...). Any help you could provide would be broadly appreciated and valued. Thank you, Vitreology (talk) 00:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned - Sorry, I can't seem to be working on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOneWolf (talkcontribs) 22:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For a future GAN. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New expansion for DYKN. Thank you very much~ Nyanardsan (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking a copy edit for this recently promoted GA. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs significant formatting and grammar edits. Catalyzzt (talk) 16:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthy and currently relevant article that needs large amounts of CE work. Thanks, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the neutrality could be better on this article and so is the verifiability of it. --The Cadillac Ranger (talk) 22:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this. Thank you! OOOTenx (talk) 14:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plan, first GA (GAN) and then FA (FAC). --TheUzbek (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to kindly request a thorough and comprehensive copyedit of this article to prepare it for GAN. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information in the meantime! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently expanded a bit; needs a bit of a cleanup. Pamzeis (talk) 03:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article just failed its GAN. I would like any help in fixing the issues mentioned in the review to get it to that status. If possible, I wouldn't mind if any feedback was given for an eventual FAC. FountofInterestingInfo (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FountofInterestingInfo: please note a copy-editor generally will not deal with sourcing problems (unless they want to), which appears to be the main reason for the failure at GAN. Checking sources and ensuring the accuracy of text isn't part of the GOCE's remit. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 19:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Baffle gab1978 I am aware of that. But the review did seem to imply copy editing issues, even if it was a less pervasive problem. So I would still appreciate it if someone could look over the article to ensure that it’s formatted correctly and that there are no significant issues on that front. FountofInterestingInfo (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to nominate for good article (GAN) after its recent expansion.Tintor2 (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on submitting the 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion article to GAN and would appreciate a copyedit before the nomination. Thanks. Tomobe03 (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing needed in my failed GA nominee (GAN) Nazran uprising to fix any poorly written text and grammatical errors that I may have missed. Thanks! WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 09:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing needed in my GA nominee (GAN) Chakh Akhriev to fix any poorly written text and grammatical errors that I may have missed. Thanks! WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy edit on the article on Stephanie Thomas to address the neutral point of view issues. OttyBen (talk) 02:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OttyBen:, I've removed some unreffed text, and much of the POV / promotional text; there are two refs that fail verification (they don't say what the article says) and one has a dead url (returns a 404). Uncited text can be removed per WP:BLP and WP:VERIFY. I've added tags where appropriate. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article with a potential to be made into B-class (BCN). Needs some general cleanup especially the grammatical part.42.107.194.39 (talk) 06:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For a GAN. Let me know how I can be of assistance ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to submit this for FAC, but something about the prose is still a bit off. Henceforth I decided to bring this to GOCE to help clean up the article that would be acceptable at FAC. ZKang123 (talk) 13:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to get some feedback or polishing on this article before taking it to FAR. Any help would be appreciated. Westminster Abbey is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and I think it deserves a gold star article! JRennocks (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A long title for just an anime episode. For a GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 09:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking a copy edit for this recently promoted Good article (GAN). Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to submit the Croatian state right article as a GAN. I would appreciate a copyedit to improve article prose before the nomination Thanks. Tomobe03 (talk) 23:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential GAN. I don't feel too confident in its wording, and I feel that at least some of the material may not pass due to potential paraphrasing. Requesting somebody to look through it and copy edit parts that may need it. B3251 (talk) 00:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. MusicforthePeople (talk) 20:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Did a large copyedit and removed some unreferenced material. The prose is problematic and unencyclopedic at times. Thanks! Karst (talk) 23:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential for GAN.Tintor2 (talk) 00:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will be nominating for FLC sometime next year. The prose could definitely use a clean up. Erick (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom on hold. The article is well structured with citations wherever necessary along with images. Just not good because of grammatical errors and phrase errors. I'm not good with copyedit. Going to nominate for GA/FA (GAN / FAC). Drat8sub (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drat8sub:,  Working I will give it a shot.Leoneix (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It might take longer than I had previously anticipated (pretty big and detailed article), probably 2-3 days might be 4. Leoneix (talk) 14:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Leoneix:, the GOCE tag has been removed by bot. Is it okay? And I want to have little conversation regarding few points which otherwise might affect the whole article. So, is your talk page a better place or the article talk page? Drat8sub (talk) 14:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this article. Thanks. M.A.LasTroniN910t@lk 03:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Will take this on - I'm a newbie editor, please bear with me. Janifrax12 (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: @Janifrax12's last edit is on 6 November. They might be inactive. Mox Eden (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is my first time requesting help from here, so hopefully I did this correctly. The article I listed above contains a huge quantity of grammatical errors, along with so many run-on sentences that it overwhelmed me to the point of coming here to ask for assistance in making major edits or even a huge rewrite to the article to make it more concise, readable, and understandable. It's also extremely long, and likely contains extraneous material, although I can't necessarily identify what parts are unnecessary. I tried my best to edit, but it's quite the long article, and also I can't understand some sections quite well enough to rewrite them in a way that makes sense. Thank you in advance for the help!!! Purpose: PR? SonOfYoutubers (talk) 03:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatical mistakes in the article every now and then. Fixed some, unsure about some of the legal language that does look incorrect on a glance. Please do take a look. Thanks. Gotitbro (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Needs general c/e as the user who added chunks of content is not a native English speaker. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. MusicforthePeople (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1987 film, made a FA in 2022. A copyedit would be the final finishing touches before it runs on the main page. Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like someone to tighten up the prose so I can renominate it for FAC. I have copyedited it myself and would like another pair of eyes. Thanks. Wingwatchers (talk) 07:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Putting this up here in the hopes that I can get it to FA (FAC) status in the future. I just need someone to go through the prose and make any improvements where possible, as it's probably difficult for me to be objective. Hopefully, some of the theoretical stuff make sense, and if not, it can be simplified or I can assist with it where possible. PanagiotisZois (talk) 21:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Has neutrality and grammar issues. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to eventually nominate the article for FAC, so any help towards that is appreciated. ZooBlazer 20:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All sorts (punctuation; style, even speling) of things need work. An editor involved in the controversial aspects of the article reverted the previous addition of a CE tag, suggesting DIY because "[t]his applies to every article". Given the length, I have no interest in doing it all by myself and I try to avoid that particular topic area anyway. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 16:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a questionable request, as the article is actively edited, as well as very long (29 edits this month, over 14k word size). The requester has only made one edit to the article, the addition of a copy editing tag here. Dhtwiki (talk) 04:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC) (edited 06:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC) and 06:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC))[reply]