User contributions for 110.174.137.169

2 February 2020

• 13:3413:34, 2 February 2020 diff hist +160‎ 2020 Australian Open – Men's singles ‎No edit summary

25 January 2020

• 16:2316:23, 25 January 2020 diff hist −1,611‎ Jim Saleam ‎ The content doesn't seem relevant in this section. True enough, but it reads like an awkward joust. Perhaps it could be altered and moved to a different section (perhaps exploring his past denials of any Nazi affiliation)? Tag: references removed

17 September 2019

• 16:2216:22, 17 September 2019 diff hist +19‎ 2019 French Open – Men's singles ‎ Added one minor elaboration.

9 September 2019

• 01:4701:47, 9 September 2019 diff hist +6‎ 2019 US Open – Men's singles ‎No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 01:4401:44, 9 September 2019 diff hist +128‎ 2019 US Open – Men's singles ‎ Added one historical point. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 01:3601:36, 9 September 2019 diff hist +12‎ 2019 US Open – Men's singles ‎ Sequence correction. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 01:3001:30, 9 September 2019 diff hist +166‎ 2019 US Open – Men's singles ‎ Added one key point. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 01:2301:23, 9 September 2019 diff hist −7‎ 2019 US Open – Men's singles ‎ Fixed a minor error. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19 May 2019

• 19:2819:28, 19 May 2019 diff hist 0‎ List of tennis title leaders in the Open Era ‎ Nadal just won in Rome.
• 17:2517:25, 19 May 2019 diff hist 0‎ All-time tennis records – Men's singles ‎ →‎Situational stats
• 17:2117:21, 19 May 2019 diff hist 0‎ All-time tennis records – Men's singles ‎ →‎Situational stats
• 17:2017:20, 19 May 2019 diff hist 0‎ All-time tennis records – Men's singles ‎ →‎Situational stats
• 17:1417:14, 19 May 2019 diff hist 0‎ All-time tennis records – Men's singles ‎ →‎Situational stats
• 16:4816:48, 19 May 2019 diff hist 0‎ List of tennis players career achievements ‎No edit summary
• 16:4516:45, 19 May 2019 diff hist +10‎ List of tennis players career achievements ‎ Undid revision 897831394 by 110.174.137.169 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 16:4416:44, 19 May 2019 diff hist −10‎ List of tennis players career achievements ‎No edit summary
• 16:4216:42, 19 May 2019 diff hist −13‎ List of tennis players career achievements ‎No edit summary
• 16:4116:41, 19 May 2019 diff hist +19‎ List of tennis players career achievements ‎No edit summary

16 September 2018

• 15:5115:51, 16 September 2018 diff hist −16‎ 2002 French Open – Men's singles ‎No edit summary

25 May 2018

• 06:0906:09, 25 May 2018 diff hist +9‎ Fabrice Santoro ‎ Added win percentage

21 February 2018

• 17:0617:06, 21 February 2018 diff hist +1,532‎ Talk:Scientific racism ‎ →‎pseudoscientific

13 February 2018

• 09:1209:12, 13 February 2018 diff hist +102‎ Keith Windschuttle ‎ →‎Major publications

15 March 2017

• 14:5414:54, 15 March 2017 diff hist −19‎ Australia First Party ‎No edit summary
• 14:5214:52, 15 March 2017 diff hist +19‎ Australia First Party ‎No edit summary

10 September 2016

• 11:5011:50, 10 September 2016 diff hist 0‎ 2004 State of Origin series ‎ →‎Game I: Error. Timmins only scored one try.

11 December 2015

• 06:5106:51, 11 December 2015 diff hist +12‎ Anaximander ‎ →‎Origin of humankind

13 November 2015

• 04:5704:57, 13 November 2015 diff hist −10‎ Keith Windschuttle ‎ Just updating the section regarding the expected release of Volume II.

2 November 2015

• 07:1807:18, 2 November 2015 diff hist +31‎ Lyndall Ryan ‎No edit summary

21 October 2015

• 07:5407:54, 21 October 2015 diff hist +1‎ Silent Hills ‎ →‎Cancellation: Updated poll results.

30 September 2015

• 08:2508:25, 30 September 2015 diff hist +2,329‎ User talk:110.174.137.169 ‎ →‎IHR

20 July 2015

• 02:3402:34, 20 July 2015 diff hist +40‎ Institute for Historical Review ‎ Undid revision 671976151 by Doug Weller (talk) Citing sources is not the same as parroting them. Had you been quoting, you would be correct. Again, this article reads like a smear.

18 July 2015

• 09:0409:04, 18 July 2015 diff hist +40‎ Institute for Historical Review ‎ Undid revision 671764154 by Vsmith (talk) You are arguing from obvious bias. The page looks like a childish stab, and that undermines the credibility of the article.

16 July 2015

• 20:2720:27, 16 July 2015 diff hist 0‎ Institute for Historical Review ‎ typo
• 20:2620:26, 16 July 2015 diff hist +40‎ Institute for Historical Review ‎ correcting a bias. I don't like the IHR either, but this article reads like a slur, not like an objective piece of scholarship.

13 July 2015

• 11:5211:52, 13 July 2015 diff hist +40‎ Institute for Historical Review ‎ Though I agree with the sentiment, the wording was far too biased. Some things they question are indeed open to debate, so to say they are merely denialists is a bit dishonest too.

22 March 2015

• 08:0008:00, 22 March 2015 diff hist +12‎ Australian history wars ‎ There seems to be some equivocation here. There looks to be an attempt to blur the lines between fabrication and mistake. I have added this tag so that people will be aware that Foster's claims need more rigorous assessment.
• 07:5407:54, 22 March 2015 diff hist +106‎ Australian history wars ‎ Windschuttle's claims were broader. He did not only claim that the directors were wrong about policy, he also accused them on straying from the facts about the protagonists of the film.