User contributions for 92.12.82.40
Appearance
For 92.12.82.40 talk block log logs global block log filter log
17 July 2024
- 05:4105:41, 17 July 2024 diff hist +2,569 Talk:Kei car →GMC truck current
- 05:2205:22, 17 July 2024 diff hist +1,263 Talk:Kei car →Speed limit changes: new section Tag: New topic
- 05:1305:13, 17 July 2024 diff hist +84 Talk:Kei car →Diesel engines?
- 05:1005:10, 17 July 2024 diff hist +1,956 Talk:Kei car →Diesel engines?: new section Tag: New topic
16 July 2024
- 17:0017:00, 16 July 2024 diff hist +509 Talk:Tata Nano →Tata specs page is a deadlink: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:5616:56, 16 July 2024 diff hist −4 Tata Nano →Technical specifications: and hopefully one last time to fix the access dates
- 16:5616:56, 16 July 2024 diff hist −2 Tata Nano →Technical specifications: Whoooops. It's been some time since I last did any wiki editing. Hopefully this unbreaks the table but still leaves separation between the lines? On that note, can't double check the Tata website page for veracity because it's a dead link now, but I can't any longer remember how to mark that...
- 16:5416:54, 16 July 2024 diff hist +575 Tata Nano →Technical specifications: Whoever put that original "30 seconds to 60km/h" thing either misread a table showing mph as km/h, or was trying to make the car look bad. That kind of time is completely improbable for a lightweight 35-ish HP vehicle, and even the actual time is already somewhat slow due to top gear being overdrive but shifted into at 70km/h. It's annoyingly hard to get good hard specs on this car but I've done what I can to evidence it within the limits of my ability and patience
18 April 2024
- 14:4214:42, 18 April 2024 diff hist −1 Fiat Fiorino →Engines: Uno diesel has 76Nm, not 76lbft. I'd suspect a typo when entering the conversion but that literally had "103Nm"? There's one or two sources out there which say that but they seem erroneous vs the majority (at least one seems to be using the 21st century turbodiesel figure?), and it's at odds with the Nm-per-litre of the larger Fiat NA diesels of the time.
- 14:3814:38, 18 April 2024 diff hist +625 User talk:92.12.82.40 →Fiat Uno diesel: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 14:3414:34, 18 April 2024 diff hist +671 User talk:Mr.choppers →Uno Diesel reversion - accepted: new section Tag: New topic
17 April 2024
- 15:0315:03, 17 April 2024 diff hist +1 Fiat Uno →Diesel: think there was a typo or misreading - other listings for this engine say 76 *lbft* not nm, and that converts to 106nm. The lower figure is extremely weak for both a diesel and a petrol of this size and is even beaten by the 1.05 petrol, plus would have to be maintained up past 4000rpm in order to achieve the stated power output Tag: Reverted