User contributions for Blarrck
A user with 63 edits. Account created on 20 March 2013.
23 September 2023
- 07:5907:59, 23 September 2023 diff hist −28 m Mike Flanagan (filmmaker) Seemed better phrased and avoided 2 sentences in a row on 'praise' Tag: Visual edit
28 July 2023
- 14:4214:42, 28 July 2023 diff hist −581 2023 in film →Box-office records: Is being the 3rd best opening for a Spider-man movie a record worth noting? Tag: Visual edit
- 14:4014:40, 28 July 2023 diff hist −126 m 2023 in film →Box-office records: If it was 'mainly' due to anything this should presumably be sourced Tag: Visual edit
27 July 2023
- 13:4713:47, 27 July 2023 diff hist −1,273 Oppenheimer (film) Undid revision 1167381761 by JSH-alive (talk) Twice the length of any other summary of a critic's viewpoint. Did a queck check and the author did not seem to be an established film critic, with only 13 posts and no biography or summary on The Print. Tag: Undo
22 July 2023
- 15:2715:27, 22 July 2023 diff hist −14 m Paul Givan →First Minister of Northern Ireland: Minor grammatical edit Tag: Visual edit
- 15:2515:25, 22 July 2023 diff hist +260 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Requesting protection for Ravi Bhatia
- 15:2215:22, 22 July 2023 diff hist −25 m Ravi Bhatia →Career: How many times is the same 'gender equality' joke going to be edited into this? Tag: Visual edit
- 15:1815:18, 22 July 2023 diff hist −376 Edwin Poots →Achievements: I assume the 'achievements' section was tongue in cheek. Moved the 21 days information to a more appropriate place Tag: Visual edit
21 July 2023
- 16:5516:55, 21 July 2023 diff hist −6,013 Top Gun: Maverick →Critical response: Attempted to remove undue weight and reduce length. Tag: Visual edit
20 July 2023
- 12:0212:02, 20 July 2023 diff hist −4 m Chicago (2002 film) →Critical response Tag: Visual edit
- 12:0112:01, 20 July 2023 diff hist +11 m Chicago (2002 film) →Critical response: Minor grammatical edit Tag: Visual edit
17 July 2023
- 13:4913:49, 17 July 2023 diff hist −2 m The Good Dinosaur →Box office: Old phrasing indicated that marketing alone cost $350 million. Re-phrased for clarity. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:4313:43, 17 July 2023 diff hist −128 m Elemental (2023 film) Re-phrased a little, seemed more objective this way Tag: Visual edit
- 11:3511:35, 17 July 2023 diff hist −42 m The Lord of the Rings: Gollum Minor grammatical edit Tag: Visual edit
- 11:2811:28, 17 July 2023 diff hist −538 Pixar Updated the box office total, swapped out an outdated source and removed information that seemed extraneous. Tag: Visual edit
16 July 2023
- 11:0811:08, 16 July 2023 diff hist −439 Pixar Didn't seem necessary to list nominated and non-nominated films in the introduction. Tag: Visual edit
14 January 2023
- 19:4819:48, 14 January 2023 diff hist −8 m 47 Meters Down No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
29 August 2022
- 11:1011:10, 29 August 2022 diff hist −24 m Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons It seems to have received acclaim on some platforms but not others. Tag: Visual edit
21 June 2022
- 14:5714:57, 21 June 2022 diff hist −42 m Jurassic World Dominion Undid revision 1094242881 by Akandkur (talk) Poorly phrased Tag: Undo
30 May 2022
- 09:0809:08, 30 May 2022 diff hist −14 University of Tsukuba Cleaned up the features section a bit Tag: Visual edit
- 09:0209:02, 30 May 2022 diff hist −2 University of Tsukuba Tidied up the header a bit. Article needs quite a bit of change, honestly I'd remove the list sections altogether Tag: Visual edit
22 May 2022
- 22:2722:27, 22 May 2022 diff hist −225 Arlene Foster Undid revision 1089081654 by Sgitheanach12 (talk) What cartoons? I think if you want to keep this in it might need some expansion or explanation Tag: Undo
20 May 2022
- 09:1809:18, 20 May 2022 diff hist −37 m Moon Jae-in →Legacy: Minor grammar issues Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1609:16, 20 May 2022 diff hist −8 m Cho Kuk Minor grammar issues Tag: Visual edit
16 May 2022
- 07:1507:15, 16 May 2022 diff hist −224 Overkill's The Walking Dead Previously it seemed to be edits built on each other, this is much more succint, struck me as more suited to the header Tag: Visual edit
- 07:1007:10, 16 May 2022 diff hist +43 Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons →Critical response: Only had an average of 90 on Metacritic, the others are marked as 'generally fvaorable' Tag: Visual edit
- 07:0607:06, 16 May 2022 diff hist −7 m Starbreeze Studios The previous essentially says that making a good licensed game gave them a reputation for making a good licensed game Tag: Visual edit
15 May 2022
- 11:3811:38, 15 May 2022 diff hist −63 Ravi Bhatia Undid revision 1087877783 by 2409:4066:4:C2DD:0:0:1010:98A5 (talk) Unhelpful, either a joke or very badly phrased Tag: Undo
- 11:0311:03, 15 May 2022 diff hist −223 Arlene Foster →First Minister of Northern Ireland: Surely this language is strong enough that if it isn't adequately sourced, it shouldn't be here? Tag: Visual edit
1 May 2022
- 07:2507:25, 1 May 2022 diff hist 0 m Jeremy Corbyn Updated the 'as of' section Tag: Visual edit
- 07:2307:23, 1 May 2022 diff hist +3 m Theresa May →Post-premiership: Minor grammatical edit Tag: Visual edit
27 April 2022
- 16:3016:30, 27 April 2022 diff hist −80 Jason Schreier Undid revision 1084965242 by Blarrck (talk) Sorry, misread and didn't see it was already reverted Tag: Undo
- 16:2916:29, 27 April 2022 diff hist +80 Jason Schreier Undid revision 1083937639 by Wikipelli (talk) Doesn't seem particularly important. Also unsourced Tags: Undo Reverted
12 April 2022
- 13:5113:51, 12 April 2022 diff hist −3 Ravi Bhatia →Career: His response was not greeted by worldwide acclaim Tag: Visual edit
25 March 2022
- 10:0010:00, 25 March 2022 diff hist +317 m Kotaku →Gamergate harassment campaign: Seemed like a slightly more explanatory reason - 'sexist and racist' as opposed to 'cancer'. Tag: Visual edit
- 09:5609:56, 25 March 2022 diff hist −8 m Jason Schreier →At Kotaku: Totilo is no longer the 'current' editor in chief Tag: Visual edit
- 09:4809:48, 25 March 2022 diff hist +3,785 When I'm a Moth →Reception: I would consider this an actual attempt to compromise. Points from various reviews, both indepdendent and mainstream, and the overall reception, as done in practically every other film page on this site. Only used sources from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. Attempted to give equal weight to both sides. Tags: citing a blog or free web host Visual edit
- 08:4308:43, 25 March 2022 diff hist +9 m Days Gone →Sales: Clarified the liftime sales were in Japan only Tag: Visual edit
- 07:1907:19, 25 March 2022 diff hist +93 m List of games by Firaxis Games →Games: Updated Midnight Suns Release Date Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 07:1507:15, 25 March 2022 diff hist −1,068 When I'm a Moth →Reception: You have again deleted the most notable and widely used sources from the body of the article. That's not a compromise. I've changed it to what actually seems to be more in line with Wikipedia film pages, which is the summary backed up with Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes. Plenty of 'independent critics' gave it negative reviews, so frankly your 'independent' angle doesn't hold much weight. I'm perfectly happy to have a moderator come in if it means that much to you. Tag: Visual edit
23 March 2022
- 18:3418:34, 23 March 2022 diff hist 0 Michel Temer Undid revision 1078837389 by ErickSeverinoTavared (talk) Vandalism Tag: Undo
18 March 2022
- 22:0222:02, 18 March 2022 diff hist +493 When I'm a Moth Undid revision by 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:6dfb:bfeb:e82d:cabf Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic are the sources used for overall reception of movies on almost every film page on this site. The fact you don't like what they're saying doesn't make them bias, especially since Rotten Tomatoes uses twice as many reviews as you. You haven't attempted to balance these with your own view, which seems to be unique to you and based on 5 much less notable sources, one of which is literally a '5 Reasons Why' post. Tags: Undo Reverted
16 March 2022
- 12:1812:18, 16 March 2022 diff hist −136 Michel Temer →Criminal charges: Made several changes to correct the tense. Shuffled around a few sentences as well Tag: Visual edit
- 12:1012:10, 16 March 2022 diff hist −5 m Michel Temer →Second impeachment attempt Tag: Visual edit
13 March 2022
- 17:2217:22, 13 March 2022 diff hist +129 François Fillon Added an update to the header, since he's now resigned. Worth removing the entire paragraph maybe? Only a 3 month position in the end. That he's left can be seen https://www.sibur.ru/en/about/corporate/directors/ and https://www.lesechos.fr/finance-marches/marches-financiers/les-administrateurs-europeens-demissionnent-en-nombre-des-conseils-des-societes-russes-1392931 . Wasn't sure where to leave the links if they aren't allowed in the header Tag: Visual edit
- 17:1517:15, 13 March 2022 diff hist −3 List of video games notable for negative reception →2010s: Slight update to Final Fantasy XIV Tag: Visual edit
- 17:1217:12, 13 March 2022 diff hist −1,605 List of video games notable for negative reception →1980s: Change it back if I'm wrong. But there's only one source here, and on the actual page there's only a couple of negative reviews from when it first released. Is it really 'notably' negatively received? All of the others seem to have attracted much more vitrol Tag: Visual edit
5 March 2022
- 11:2611:26, 5 March 2022 diff hist 0 m Box-office bomb Minor grammar issues Tag: Visual edit
2 March 2022
- 17:2717:27, 2 March 2022 diff hist +493 When I'm a Moth Undid revision 1071391512 by 2A00:23C8:5983:E900:1523:1940:7B0B:AD93 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
12 February 2022
- 21:0221:02, 12 February 2022 diff hist −1 m Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd →Judgment: Seems like very strong language on a current piece of English case law. Maybe needs to be made fairer beyond this also Tag: Visual edit
