User contributions for Bolt9094
Appearance
Results for Bolt9094 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 110 edits. Account created on 2 October 2019.
6 March 2023
- 04:4704:47, 6 March 2023 diff hist +31 m Joe Lombardi grammar
- 04:4504:45, 6 March 2023 diff hist +1,964 Los Angeles Chargers coaching changes in the 2023 offseason and typo fix
11 November 2021
- 00:5500:55, 11 November 2021 diff hist +1 m Douglas the camel punctuation error (added period to end of sentence needing one)
19 September 2021
- 00:4700:47, 19 September 2021 diff hist +2 m Balts typo correction ("nothern" to "northern")
27 April 2021
- 22:1322:13, 27 April 2021 diff hist +31 m Nick Fuentes No edit summary
- 22:1122:11, 27 April 2021 diff hist +9 m Nick Fuentes No edit summary
- 22:1022:10, 27 April 2021 diff hist +16 Nick Fuentes added his italian descent, since it is his most prominent ancestry
- 22:0522:05, 27 April 2021 diff hist +74 Nick Fuentes No edit summary
- 21:5621:56, 27 April 2021 diff hist +309 Nick Fuentes no fly list
27 March 2021
- 21:5221:52, 27 March 2021 diff hist +53 Nick Fuentes nick fuentes claims to be a paleoconservative and he is mentioned on the paleoconservative wiki page, so it makes sense for it to be listed here
29 January 2021
- 00:4500:45, 29 January 2021 diff hist +4 m Los Angeles Chargers grammar fix
- 00:4300:43, 29 January 2021 diff hist +1,231 Los Angeles Chargers brandon staley hire
- 00:2200:22, 29 January 2021 diff hist +240 Shane Day chargers
15 January 2021
- 02:5802:58, 15 January 2021 diff hist +64 Nick Fuentes what evidence was used to deny him being in the capitol Tag: Reverted
29 December 2020
- 06:3806:38, 29 December 2020 diff hist −2 m Passer rating added "2TM" to marcus mariota, fixed team abbreviations, both on passer rating all-time leader list
19 September 2020
- 00:5700:57, 19 September 2020 diff hist −2,414 R/The Donald cleanup, fixed Tag: Reverted
13 August 2020
- 14:5514:55, 13 August 2020 diff hist +307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheDonald.win No edit summary
- 05:4305:43, 13 August 2020 diff hist +136 TheDonald.win re-adding edits made by the users LeftScript and Adil3214
- 05:4205:42, 13 August 2020 diff hist +2,723 TheDonald.win The information should remain until a consensus is reached. I am not starting an "edit war", I was not the one who initially removed multiple paragraphs from the article, I am simply re-adding them. It is best it remains until a consensus is reached so that incase the consensus is to keep, we'll have the information still available, and if it is to remove, then we can simply remove it. There is no need to remove it now until the consensus is reached. Tag: Undo
- 05:4005:40, 13 August 2020 diff hist −20 TheDonald.win temporary revision, will be re-added once the mass removal done by user Valjean are dealt with Tag: Undo
- 05:4005:40, 13 August 2020 diff hist +1 m TheDonald.win temporary revision, will be re-added once the mass removal done by user Valjean are dealt with Tag: Undo
- 05:3805:38, 13 August 2020 diff hist 0 TheDonald.win temporary revision, will be re-added once the mass removal done by user Valjean are dealt with Tag: Undo
12 August 2020
- 19:5119:51, 12 August 2020 diff hist +336 Talk:TheDonald.win No edit summary
- 19:0219:02, 12 August 2020 diff hist +2,746 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972557859 by Valjean (talk) The information should stay until a concensus should be agreed on what to do with it, because if we all end up agreeing to keep it, then there may be other edits that eventually force a manual edit and the loss of these multiple paragraphs. Tag: Undo
- 17:4417:44, 12 August 2020 diff hist +558 Talk:TheDonald.win No edit summary
- 17:3117:31, 12 August 2020 diff hist +2,746 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972551548 by Domeditrix (talk) fixing mass-removal of multiple paragraphs in the article Tag: Undo
- 17:2317:23, 12 August 2020 diff hist 0 m TheDonald.win moved a sentence to a different area of the article that makes more sense, also the user JzG has shown in the past on wikipedia, hostility towards conservatives on wikipedia as shown here in this screenshot https://i.maga.host/Xs3sQSh.png and on this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG/The_politics_of_sourcing#Reality_has_a_well-known_liberal_bias and YouTube's article has a paragraph about the sites function that isn't sourced shown in this screenshot https://i.maga.host/jKYpFk6.png
- 17:0617:06, 12 August 2020 diff hist +2,288 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972546586 by JzG (talk) removing mass-removal of paragraphs on the article by user JzG Tag: Undo
- 17:0617:06, 12 August 2020 diff hist +458 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972546758 by JzG (talk) Tag: Undo
- 17:0517:05, 12 August 2020 diff hist +238 User talk:Bolt9094 No edit summary
- 16:5016:50, 12 August 2020 diff hist +2,288 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972543642 by JzG (talk) Failed to read my statement on why I removed his edits Tag: Undo
- 16:3816:38, 12 August 2020 diff hist +2,287 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972542628 by Username6892 (talk) this is about how the website operates, the only source you're gonna get is from the site itself and this is a general description of features on the site. Tag: Undo
- 16:3716:37, 12 August 2020 diff hist +1 m TheDonald.win alexa ranking
- 16:2816:28, 12 August 2020 diff hist +1,900 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972495846 by JzG (talk) Tag: Undo
- 16:2316:23, 12 August 2020 diff hist +387 TheDonald.win Undid revision 972495948 by JzG (talk) Tag: Undo
- 02:4302:43, 12 August 2020 diff hist +272 User talk:Domeditrix No edit summary
- 02:1902:19, 12 August 2020 diff hist +576 User talk:Domeditrix No edit summary
- 01:0201:02, 12 August 2020 diff hist −490 TheDonald.win the term "far-right" is opinion based and most users identify with the right-wing and not far-right politically as I stated, I'd be willing to add that a minority of users are apart of the far-right in a separate section of this wiki, but the majority of the user base is right-wing
- 00:5200:52, 12 August 2020 diff hist +596 User talk:Domeditrix No edit summary
- 00:3900:39, 12 August 2020 diff hist −486 TheDonald.win as I stated prior, the far-right makes up a minority of the site and a majority would identify with the right-wing or center-right and not the far/alt-right. Adding far-right is a bias from the left-wing/center-left, it'd be like if I were to put on the wikipedia page for Reddit that it is a far-left platform because some people on there identify with the far-left, such as members of the subreddit they have titled r/communism101.
- 00:0500:05, 12 August 2020 diff hist +6 m TheDonald.win grammar correction
- 00:0400:04, 12 August 2020 diff hist +939 TheDonald.win added the forum's reaction to Kamala Harris being selected as the Democratic Vice Presidential candidate, such reactions included memes about her past and present actions/policies
11 August 2020
- 23:0223:02, 11 August 2020 diff hist 0 m TheDonald.win forgot to adjust date for most recent alexa ranking, changed to August 11th from 10th
- 23:0123:01, 11 August 2020 diff hist −118 TheDonald.win removed sentence with reference that had no link with it
- 22:5922:59, 11 August 2020 diff hist 0 m TheDonald.win alexa ranking
- 22:5822:58, 11 August 2020 diff hist −492 TheDonald.win far-right makes up a huge minority of thedonald.win's population, it'd be like saying the republican party is far-right and democrat party is far-left because some members consider themselves on those ends of the political spectrum.
- 03:4603:46, 11 August 2020 diff hist +221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheDonald.win No edit summary
10 August 2020
- 23:2923:29, 10 August 2020 diff hist +840 m Talk:TheDonald.win debating the "alt-right" entry of the article
- 23:0923:09, 10 August 2020 diff hist +6 m TheDonald.win changed "U.S" to "United States" and "around the world" to "worldwide"
- 23:0623:06, 10 August 2020 diff hist +1 m TheDonald.win alexa ranking