User contributions for Psychword
A user with 25 edits. Account created on 18 January 2010.
22 January 2010
- 05:4805:48, 22 January 2010 diff hist +900 User talk:Psychword →Previous account: Comment on my account being blocked
21 January 2010
- 23:0623:06, 21 January 2010 diff hist +393 User talk:Will Beback/archive72 →Previous account: new section
- 23:0223:02, 21 January 2010 diff hist +365 User talk:Psychword Response to Will Beback
- 22:0322:03, 21 January 2010 diff hist +8,808 Talk:Rind et al. controversy →Reversion of my edits was against Wikipedia policy: Summary of my edits
- 19:2419:24, 21 January 2010 diff hist +678 Talk:Rind et al. controversy →Reversion of my edits was against Wikipedia policy
- 19:1519:15, 21 January 2010 diff hist +906 Wikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch/Pedophile topic mentorship →Problems with new account Psychword
- 05:0405:04, 21 January 2010 diff hist +4,011 Talk:Rind et al. controversy →Reversion of my edits was against Wikipedia policy: new section
- 04:1904:19, 21 January 2010 diff hist +1,759 Rind et al. controversy Undid revision 338803225 by Jack-A-Roe (talk) Jack-A-Roe, if you disagree with my edits, bring it to the discussion page
18 January 2010
- 03:2803:28, 18 January 2010 diff hist +88 Rind et al. controversy →Assertions of bias: Removed incorrect statement about "avoiding individuals who..." because the study was representative of the general population, which clinical and legal samples are not
- 03:2303:23, 18 January 2010 diff hist −8 m Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: Changed location of some references
- 03:1203:12, 18 January 2010 diff hist +84 m Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: Added further references
- 03:1003:10, 18 January 2010 diff hist +203 m Rind et al. controversy →Assertions of bias: Moved Finkelhor reference forward to this section
- 03:0603:06, 18 January 2010 diff hist −4 m Rind et al. controversy →Assertions of bias: Corrected reference tag
- 03:0503:05, 18 January 2010 diff hist +91 Rind et al. controversy →Assertions of bias: Added references
- 03:0203:02, 18 January 2010 diff hist +23 m Rind et al. controversy →Conceptual issues: Added reference
- 03:0003:00, 18 January 2010 diff hist +238 Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: Added reference to Finkelhor review
- 02:5702:57, 18 January 2010 diff hist +32 m Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: Provided full reference for Persinger
- 02:5502:55, 18 January 2010 diff hist +2 m Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy
- 02:5302:53, 18 January 2010 diff hist +332 Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: Added reference to Persinger
- 02:5002:50, 18 January 2010 diff hist +678 Rind et al. controversy Undid revision 338479835 by Will Beback (talk)
- 02:0202:02, 18 January 2010 diff hist −165 Rind et al. controversy →Conceptual issues: Added discussion of the common claim of universality of harm, contrary to the "straw man" argument
- 01:5401:54, 18 January 2010 diff hist +562 Rind et al. controversy →Assertions of bias: Added caveat at end about Rind and Finkelhor's assertions of bias of the advocates
- 01:4901:49, 18 January 2010 diff hist −99 m Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy
- 01:4701:47, 18 January 2010 diff hist +185 Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: Added mention of Persinger's work
- 01:4401:44, 18 January 2010 diff hist +195 Rind et al. controversy →Subsequent research and legacy: This section was almost completely fallacious and obviously written by someone who had not read the original study Tag: references removed
