User contributions for Scytsari
A user with 103 edits. Account created on 24 April 2015.
19 July 2015
- 20:2120:21, 19 July 2015 diff hist +211 User talk:Scytsari →unblock
- 06:1506:15, 19 July 2015 diff hist +6 User talk:Scytsari →unblock
- 06:1306:13, 19 July 2015 diff hist +87 User talk:Scytsari →unblock
- 06:0406:04, 19 July 2015 diff hist +303 User talk:Scytsari →unblock: new section
- 05:4005:40, 19 July 2015 diff hist +120 Talk:Tajiks →Sources?
- 05:3805:38, 19 July 2015 diff hist +166 Talk:Tajiks →Sources?
- 05:3205:32, 19 July 2015 diff hist +2,047 Talk:Tajiks →Final consensus on gallery images: new section
- 05:1605:16, 19 July 2015 diff hist −1 Talk:Tajiks →Sources?: screwed the pooch on editing my input, deleting another users
- 05:1505:15, 19 July 2015 diff hist −275 Talk:Tajiks →Sources?
- 05:1205:12, 19 July 2015 diff hist +702 Talk:Tajiks →Sources?
16 July 2015
- 20:1020:10, 16 July 2015 diff hist +147 User talk:Scytsari →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
- 20:0820:08, 16 July 2015 diff hist +899 Tajiks Take it to the talk page until a consensus is reached please. I believe he is an automated bot - no way he is reverting 1 second after me.
- 20:0720:07, 16 July 2015 diff hist +899 Tajiks Take it to the talk page until a consensus is reached please.
- 20:0520:05, 16 July 2015 diff hist +899 m Tajiks Take it to the talk page or some other forum with your nationalistic agenda.
- 20:0520:05, 16 July 2015 diff hist +446 Talk:Tajiks →Who should be included in the infobox and why
- 20:0220:02, 16 July 2015 diff hist +574 Talk:Tajiks →Problem in gallery and request for this article to be moved
- 19:5919:59, 16 July 2015 diff hist +898 Tajiks Tired of these vandals/sockpuppets with nationalistic agendas, these people were all persian/tajik - common sense dictates such as well as academia
- 19:5919:59, 16 July 2015 diff hist +1 Tajiks Undid revision 671726197 by Vanjagenije (talk)
11 July 2015
- 20:4920:49, 11 July 2015 diff hist +438 Talk:Tajiks →Problem in gallery and request for this article to be moved
- 20:2820:28, 11 July 2015 diff hist +680 Tajiks Undoing vandalism.
- 08:2008:20, 11 July 2015 diff hist +680 Tajiks Undid vandalism, no point discussing something already discussed/common knowledge, user has a personal agenda.
- 04:2004:20, 11 July 2015 diff hist +680 Tajiks Undid revision 670565865 by Khestwol (talk)
- 04:1904:19, 11 July 2015 diff hist +480 Talk:Tajiks →Problem in gallery and request for this article to be moved
8 July 2015
- 06:3606:36, 8 July 2015 diff hist +682 Tajiks fixing vandalism
7 June 2015
- 06:0306:03, 7 June 2015 diff hist +154 Talk:Iranian peoples →Azeris
- 01:4101:41, 7 June 2015 diff hist +707 Talk:Iranian peoples →Azeris
- 01:3701:37, 7 June 2015 diff hist +844 Talk:Kandahar →Gandhara does not correspond to Kandahar
- 01:3301:33, 7 June 2015 diff hist +9 Kandahar "Does not equate" is proper vocabulary and grammar, again I don't understand your insistence by as I am patient, I will discuss, yet again.
5 June 2015
- 18:0718:07, 5 June 2015 diff hist +350 Talk:Iranian peoples →Azeris
- 18:0518:05, 5 June 2015 diff hist +61 Talk:Kandahar →Gandhara does not correspond to Kandahar
- 18:0318:03, 5 June 2015 diff hist +9 Kandahar We've gone over this, hundreds of kilometers to the northeast is very ambiguous and might still imply gandhara is in kandahar province, I do no understand your insistence.
3 June 2015
- 19:3119:31, 3 June 2015 diff hist +36 Nowruz This needs extensive revision, the source is a very weak source and only speaks of the nowruz tradition and not the origin, the only source we have of its origin is the shahnamah
21 May 2015
- 19:4019:40, 21 May 2015 diff hist +165 User talk:Pahlavan Qahremani →Regarding azeris
- 00:0500:05, 21 May 2015 diff hist +336 Talk:Kandahar →Gandhara does not correspond to Kandahar
20 May 2015
- 22:5522:55, 20 May 2015 diff hist +491 User talk:Pahlavan Qahremani →Regarding azeris: new section
- 21:4821:48, 20 May 2015 diff hist −53 Iranian peoples azeris speak a turkic language, and your reference doesn't state they are iranic, there is already a section on azeri/azerbaijani people on the article
19 May 2015
- 15:3615:36, 19 May 2015 diff hist +12 Shahnameh If you haven't noticed, there is no citation for either country, tajikistan is persian speaking. Stop following me around.
- 15:1315:13, 19 May 2015 diff hist +515 Talk:Kandahar →Gandhara does not correspond to Kandahar
- 04:1704:17, 19 May 2015 diff hist +302 Tajiks They are indeed persians/tajiks, you are still using sockpuppets to vandalize, take it to the talk page or you'll never get anything accomplished.
- 04:1604:16, 19 May 2015 diff hist +422 Tajiks Undid revision 663034224 by Buxariy (talk)
- 04:1604:16, 19 May 2015 diff hist +13 Tajiks Undid revision 663034675 by Buxariy (talk)
- 04:1604:16, 19 May 2015 diff hist +11 Tajiks Undid revision 663035020 by Buxariy (talk)
- 04:1604:16, 19 May 2015 diff hist +1 Tajiks Undid revision 663035072 by Buxariy (talk)
- 02:0802:08, 19 May 2015 diff hist +71 Talk:Zoroaster →Zoroaster was not persian
- 01:2001:20, 19 May 2015 diff hist −76 Zoroaster he's probably a sockpuppet, doesn't use talk page and the reference does not say he was persian but rather a prophet of the persians who adopted it much later on
- 01:1801:18, 19 May 2015 diff hist −10 Bacha bazi I reiterate, no such thing as afghan persian, this has already been discussed on the talk page.
18 May 2015
- 18:0818:08, 18 May 2015 diff hist +266 Talk:Kandahar →Gandhara does not correspond to Kandahar
- 18:0718:07, 18 May 2015 diff hist −39 Kandahar →Name: Yet another compromise edit.
- 18:0718:07, 18 May 2015 diff hist +85 Kandahar Undid revision 662963103 by Pinkbeast (talk)
- 18:0318:03, 18 May 2015 diff hist −76 Zoroaster talk page.
