Jump to content

Talk:2011–12 Persian Gulf Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Results Section

[edit]

Someone appears to have messed up the results section, I belive it's NimaFallah who did this on the 11th August just after I had completed the results. You can quite clearly see that teams appear to have 5 results recorded against them even though it is clear that they have only played 3 games!! Results should only be given for the teams who played at home on that matchday, not the away team aswell, whats the point of a grid otherwise???

Anyway, Nima can put it back right as I somply can't be bothered to amend other peoples work all the time. Druryfire (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011–12 Iran Pro League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]