Jump to content

Talk:Acheron-class destroyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Still Mistaken relationship with RAN River class TBD

[edit]

There is still no relationship with the much earlier RAN River class TBD, built to private designs much earlier. ChrisMCau (talk) 05:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken relationship with RAN River class TBD

[edit]

There is no relationship between this class and the RAN River class. The low quality secondary sources that state this are in error. Needs to be permanently edited out of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.47.82.82 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check Freidmans British Destroyers for a description of their genesis.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acheron-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]