Jump to content

Talk:Athlon II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did an engineer write this? Can anyone whith industry knowledge compare the capabilities of this vis a vis thir competitors?

Athlon II 170u?

[edit]

I do believe that the Athlon II 170u is under the Sargas core. --Phenomer TALK CONTRIBUTIONS 20:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There are also some newer Athlon II's, yet to be added to the list. Namely:

  • Athlon II X4 651K/651/641/638/631(/???) - Llano-based (K10 CPU cores), disabled IGP, 32nm, Socket FM1

Some other newer Athlon X2/X4 branded processors are also often referred as Athlon II's, even by Amazon and some other well-known webshops. Namely:

  • Athlon X2 340/X4 750K/740/730 - Trinity-based (Piledriver CPU cores), 32nm, Socket FM2 (Socket FM2+ compatible)
  • Athlon X2 370K/X4 760K - Richland-based (Piledriver CPU cores), 32nm, Socket FM2 (Socket FM2+ compatible)
  • Athlon X4 860K - Kaveri-based (Steamroller CPU cores), 28nm, Socket FM2+ (not Socket FM2 compatible)

(All with a disabled IGP.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.99.178.153 (talk) 14:05, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Athlon II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]