Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Svensksund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was move [uncontested]. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 05:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Battle of Svensksund (1790)Battle of Svensksund — Keeping a dabpage really isn't merited in this case since the second battle is by far the most notable. The 1790 battle should be at Battle of Svensksund and Battle of Svensksund (1789) will be linked to with a hatnote. Peter Isotalo 22:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Ships of the line?

[edit]

There does not appear to be any credence to the claims regarding ships of the line taking part into the battle, neither Swedish or Russian coastal fleets possessed any and both high seas fleets were elsewhere. None of the sources available to me list any ships of the line taking part into the battle. - Wanderer602 (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. It seems as if the frigates are being presented as much larger than they actually were.
The reference added by the anon is also too cryptic. Who or what is "Bain 1894" and how does one look it up? The idea that this is a matter of Swedish vs Russian sources is also entirely false since both Artéus and Glete use both Swedish and Russian sources for their figures. Russian and Swedish (primary) sources should not be confused with the nationalities of the historians using them.
Peter Isotalo 10:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Svensksund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Svensksund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]