Talk:Cam and Dursley railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Gloucestershire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Bristol and Gloucester Railway Line.

Suggest separate page for history of Coaley Junction stationSteamybrian2 (talk) 21:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Cam & Dursley railway station. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 29 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 02:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cam and Dursley railway station → Cam & Dursley railway station – Station is named with ampersand per Great Western Railway and National Rail, thus article name should reflect per MOS:&. Madditron (talk) 01:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. What matters is not the official name but the common name, and usage appears to be entirely mixed. Google Street View from April 2023 shows the station totem uses "and", photos from January 2023 and (clearer) July 2022 show that the platform name boards use "and". Thryduulf (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Per my above comment and Redrose64's below, and a photo taken by a friend (that unfortunately I do not have permission to share) which shows the platform signs used "and" at least as recently as 3 May. Thryduulf (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NCUKSTATIONS#Official names shows that the official name of the station should normally be used; if there is any doubt about what the official name is, the name given on the station platforms should be used. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Ampersands are generally best expanded unless they are exclusively used. See WP:AMPERSAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Ampersands are so 2005. Irrespective of what the official name is I don't see the benefit or value having "&" over "and" - Means the same thing and does the same job. –Davey2010^Talk 23:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.