Jump to content

Talk:Charles Oliveira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Oliveira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charles Oliveira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teeth

[edit]

Discuss 173.70.168.108 (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Champion

[edit]

Remove the sentence saying olivera is champion, he isn’t anymore 2600:8804:6900:79A:959F:895D:2637:7160 (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He will be stripped after he enter the cage tomorrow, as of now (this moment) he is still the champion - pls see promotion statement - https://www.mmafighting.com/ufc/2022/5/6/23060609/ufc-issues-statement-on-charles-oliveiras-stunning-weight-miss-future-after-ufc-274. Cassiopeia talk 00:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2022

[edit]

Greetings! Unfortunately Charles Oliveira was stripped of his title last night due to missing weight, and as such he is no longer UFC Lightweight Champion 😞 This is contrary to what is currently posted on his wiki page, which still lists him as the current champion.

Sources:

https://www.dazn.com/en-GB/news/mma/ufc-274-charles-oliveira-stripped-of-lightweight-title-after-missing-weight/1dh4ou4sx1rbp1j2biqwoklayx

https://www.si.com/mma/2022/05/06/charles-oliveira-stripped-of-lightweight-title-ahead-of-ufc-274

https://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/33867817/charles-oliveira-stripped-lightweight-belt-failing-make-weight-ufc-274


Can we have this fixed? Thank you so much! Spiff339 (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind UFC released a statement stating he is still champion until the event begins. Apologies and thank you! Spiff339 (talk) 19:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No 1 contender

[edit]

He’s the new number 1 contender 2600:8804:6900:79A:3CC2:177C:5725:A82D (talk) 05:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Charlie Olives?

[edit]

I've seen that name thrown around more so than not, why not add it in his other names list? 2600:8801:118:3300:D854:CDDB:9D3A:D58F (talk) 08:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mma

[edit]

Mma 103.167.233.23 (talk) 08:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2022

[edit]


  • What I think should be changed: Addition of "glove grab" controversy to "Mixed martial arts career" > "UFC Lightweight Champion" > 2021 > parargaph about Dustin Poirier bout.
  • Why it should be changed: It should be mentioned in the description of this bout that there was controversy over a potential glove grab in round two, which is against the rules. One of the commentators of the broadcast, Joe Rogan, pointed this out as well. Poirier was winning the bout on the feet as Oliveira is the stronger grappler but weaker striker, then Oliveira was able to take Poirier to the ground after potentially breaking the rules with the glove grab, keeping his arm trapped, taking him down, then inflicting damage for the rest of the second round. With Poirier being more damaged and exhausted than he would have been on his feet, Oliveira submitted him fairly quickly after the beginning of the following round. Here is one of many articles discussing this controversy: https://www.rt.com/sport/542950-ufc-oliveira-poirier-glove-grab-cheating/

2601:646:9080:1ED0:D418:2133:FFAC:CFE6 (talk) 01:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He was using wrist control, this was later clarified. Joe Rogan doubled down when he shouldn't have. 129.215.35.93 (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: When creating edit requests you must present desired changes in the form of please change X to Y. Asking editors to generate prose based on sources is outside the scope of an edit request. Feel free to create a new edit request or reopen this one once you have done so. —Sirdog (talk) 07:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References