Talk:Comparison of cluster software
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Untitled note
[edit]Almost all of these tools are out-of-date or unmaintained. There isn't much useful or current information here. Also, it doesn't recognize advances such as Kubernetes, Mesos, Hadoop, Nomad, and so forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:10D:C091:500:0:0:6:5DE7 (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Needs updating
[edit]This page needs to be updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.251.251 (talk) 16:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]This page had two other tables that look like they were copied from the revision control pages and then never filled in. If anyone wants to dig into them I've moved them here. --Themshow (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
The monitoring category of cluster software needs some definition/explanation.Dr. Phillip M. Feldman (talk) 01:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Eigenschaften
[edit]Software | Atomic commits | File renames | Merge file renames | Symbolic links | Pre/post-event hooks | Signed revisions | Merge tracking | End of line conversions | Tags | International Support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AccuRev | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | K.A. | ? |
Table Explanation
- Software: The name of the application that is described
User interfaces
[edit]Software | Web interfaces | Stand-alone GUIs | Integration and/or Plug-ins for IDEs |
---|---|---|---|
AccuRev | Yes | Windows, Linux, Unix, Mac OS X, BeOS available | IDEA (AccuRev4IDEA) |
Aldon | Yes | Windows | ? |
Table Explanation
- Software: The name of the application that is described
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Comparison of cluster software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705022034/http://jstm.sourceforge.net/ to http://jstm.sourceforge.net/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20051030013416/http://www.clusterresources.com/pages/products/moab-cluster-suite/workload-manager.php to http://www.clusterresources.com/pages/products/moab-cluster-suite/workload-manager.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090122062256/http://clusterresources.com/pages/products/torque-resource-manager.php to http://www.clusterresources.com/pages/products/torque-resource-manager.php
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140213100058/http://vaakya.com/ to http://vaakya.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Should Veritas be included
[edit]Should the table also contain informations about Veritas Cluster Server? --Jackobli (talk) 13:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Should HACMP be included
[edit]Should the table also contain informations about HACMP or however IBM is calling its product today?
In my eyes the content of this table is very arbitrary (i.e. it doesn't take into account the difference between load balancing and high availability) and i wonder if it is even possible to bring it to a satisfying state. --Bakunin (talk) 08:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)