Talk:Conversion rate optimization
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
edit tags
[edit]thanks. I'll take care of it shortly
formatting/style tags
[edit]can they be removed now?
OK I guess I'll remove the tags now
[edit]OK I guess I'll remove the tags now
Edit suggestions
[edit]Hi there, I have two suggestions for edits to this article. The first is that the article suggests that conversion optimisation is designed to reduce bounce rate. This is technically not true as if you design an extremely effective landing page that convinces visitors to buy without actually visiting another page on the website, you will have increased conversion rates but also increased bounce rates as bouncing is simply not visiting a second page on the site. Secondly, I would like to add a note on the most widely used conversion optimisation tool: Google's a/b testing tool which has been recently moved to the goals section of Google Analytics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddiejodriscoll84 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Correction on the above claim that Google's a/b testing tools is "the most widely used conversion optimisation tool". This is not true. This tool only has 3% market penetration among split testing tools (source http://trends.builtwith.com/analytics/a-b-testing). I'm very active in the CRO community and can assure you that this tool is not widely used by CRO practitioners. amaclickclick (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Adding Citations
[edit]Hi Guardians of the Wiki-verse, I have come to suggest. To keep it short, I tried adding a citation to an article that proves exactly what CRO is about.(imho) Unfortunately, it was seen as spam (even though, there's clearly a promotional blog that links to this page)
Therefore, with all due respect, I would like to add a link to Convertcart's piece on A/B testing ideas for CRO. What they have written is far better than the generic stuff, that goes around these days. After being classified as spam, I checked the Domain Age of Mayple and Convertcart. Guess who has been doing this for a longer time (and still was considered as spam). @SamKuru, I am going ahead as you said. I think what I've said holds value. If not, remove Mayple too. Thanks. Jordan.crowley.cc (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Feel free to remove other links that a garbage content marketing blogs. Do not add any more material that you have a conflict of interest with. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class Retailing articles
- Low-importance Retailing articles
- WikiProject Retailing articles